No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs OpenText Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 28.6%, down from 36.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Service Virtualization is 14.8%, down from 16.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 12.1%, up from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization28.6%
OpenText Service Virtualization14.8%
ReadyAPI Virtualization12.1%
Other44.49999999999999%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Marco Technology
Is scalable and easy to use, but the monitoring feature needs improvement
The support for Micro Focus Service Virtualization is better than that for other products. The technical support staff are highly skilled. Sometimes, we don't have to open a ticket. We can just go into the community and then talk to them directly. I would rate technical support at seven out of ten.
Venkata Yedida - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming
My advice for anyone who is considering this product is that it is mainly for RESTful calls. If somebody is using Swagger APIs or some RESTful calls as part of the specification that they want to virtualize, then this tool can be a good choice. Also, if they want to virtualize a GUI tool, then it is good. In general, this is a good product but I think that the user experience has to be improved. There's just a lot of manual work that has to be done with scripting. This should be reduced to make it a more seamless experience for the user. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This product helps us to simulate broken or nonexistent systems, avoid latency between projects, and perform load-bearing testing on unavailable external systems."
"Over the past 3 years which I've been using it, I've found it to be a good solution."
"The most valuable feature is that it supports so many protocols. We, being a large bank, have almost all the protocols, and it supports all of them, so that's one good thing."
"LISA VSE and Test Cases."
"We have been using it extensively for the shift left process and testing, and it helps us to accelerate and virtualize services and assets that we don't have, enabling us to test faster."
"We used a lot of other solutions, but switched to CA Service Virtualization because this one tool can cover all of our requirements."
"The other thing is, it's got probably the greatest amount of features, in terms of different technologies that you can automate and virtualize, out of any of the solutions out there."
"DevTest supports multiple testing environments so you can configure it to use one testing environment or 20, and you can change it for use in any other environments with the flick of a button."
"It is easy to use, and the coding is easier to develop as well."
"We used technical support once in a while. The support is fantastic."
"It's a much more cost efficient approach to server deployment."
"Some of the key differentiators of this tool – Easy to use, built-in integration with HP tools like LoadRunner, ALM and UFT, built-in integration with revision control software, support for multiple technologies including SAP, support for network virtualization, and the ability to control virtual services from ALM, HP ServiceTest, LoadRunner, and UFT."
"Service Virtualization cuts down dependency across dev as well as any third party components."
"I was blown away with how fast the implementation was."
"The most valuable feature is that it reduces the dependency so that the down time of the environment is not a major cost. That cost can be used for something else like the cloud."
"The purpose for this tool is very obvious and Micro Focus covers it very well."
"Our testing process time was reduced by 30%."
"It only takes a few minutes to get up and running with virtual services and RESTful calls."
"In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."
"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."
"The technical support is good."
"ServiceV Pro functionality helps in achieving better results in terms of performance and execution of APIs, which definitely results in reaching high-level standards, therefore, getting appreciation from the stakeholders as well."
"Discovery option to create virtual services."
"The solution is very easy to use."
 

Cons

"As far as the next version of it is concerned, probably some additional lightweight, portable elements."
"HPE ALM integration could be better, especially for exporting, importing, and reusing test cases written in an older version of CA Service Virtualization."
"Cross-browser support is not that good for that portal."
"We had issues in the support for virtualization of JDBC connectivity."
"It was purchased from another larger corporate project and just kind of sat there, paid for but on the shelf."
"We had to implement an external service catalog. We put it in ServiceNow. I would like to see an integrated service catalog."
"We once faced issues when we moved from 4.2 to 4.7 or 5. They completely changed the UI and there is very little support for backward compatibility."
"Stability is getting better. When we first started with it, there were some bugs."
"The current protocol needs to be updated to be much more flexible. The product needs more technical flexibility in implementation and customization."
"Pricing is always a concern for our clients, so my guess is if anything can be beat it's price."
"HP should work on providing better scripting support and include more communication and transport protocols."
"A lot of technology, a lot of Microsoft services, a lot of support to the functionality aspect of it - they need to mature a lot."
"The integration with other solutions, such as ALM and Jira, should be improved."
"More support for different protocols. I would love to see more wizards rather than relying on some custom coding, which you can use C# as well as Visual Basic scripting."
"HPE products are good, but they never make a product for a specific use. They make a product for the enterprise because that is their vision. They like multi-generational business plans. That means that they don't deliver small bits and pieces, but rather, they deliver to the enterprise."
"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."
"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements"
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
"This solution has few features for customization."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements made just to minimize the time required by a developer to use all the products collaboratively (SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro)."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present in the same tools, like SoapUI NG and LoadUI."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"Micro Service Virtualization is very expensive. The pricing of this product is in line with all of the other big name-brand products."
"It's an expensive solution, but you can get discounts. You have to buy one server and one designer together, for example, and it may cost 15 million Thai Baht."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
"This product is worth the cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Marketing Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Construction Company
10%
Transportation Company
7%
Retailer
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
Micro Focus Service Virtualization, HPE Service Virtualization
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Virgin Media, TTNet
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Tricentis, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: March 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.