We performed a comparison between Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and Sysdig Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Elastic and others in Container Monitoring."WAS GC monitoring enhanced our application performance and DB SQL performance."
"Now, we know we have a problem, because there is a primary layer of alerting or metrics monitoring put in place, that is the good part."
"Proactive snapshots of transactions and all details of a transaction are saved in case of an error."
"It's a very stable product."
"If there's something that you really need to get at that doesn't come out of the box, you can pretty easily put together some custom metrics and get those in place."
"Gives us the ability to know how our application is performing in real-time."
"Deep Dive and Transaction Analysis Triage capability."
"We receive good transactions from it with good graphs, as well, documenting the activities of total visitors on the site. We can pull the reports and provide them to the client, as required."
"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."
"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like "first class citizens"."
"The reason it's not a ten is because they don't focus enough on improving over time like other competitors do who have a more modern and complete tool."
"They can make it easier to configure."
"There is no auto flow diagram, and the alert mechanism is not as good when compared to other tools."
"The following need improvement: 1) Integration of third-party content into app maps (e.g. data coming from beats/elastic platform). 2) Support of new application server technologies, time to adopt new versions of them. 3) Dashboarding capabilities (as with all other vendors). 4) Application architecture of the central Enterprise Manager should be developed into a cloud native architecture. 5) Mitigation of SPOF – PostgreSQL database, behind Team Center."
"Upgradability to it is a project instead of a patch. If it was actually an automated process to where it just fed updates to our product that would be great. Now, we have to spin up an effort to actually upgrade the solution."
"Java Console uses too much memory."
"Dashboards need to be improved in order to make them self-explanatory."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive and address support tickets more quickly."
""Events" reporting (errors, crashes, etc.) is not clear at all in a Mesos environment (i.e., it's not clear what specific container is the one that went down). In a Docker Compose environment, it may be way better."
"It is needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 4th in Container Monitoring with 161 reviews while Sysdig Monitor is ranked 9th in Container Monitoring. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 8.0, while Sysdig Monitor is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sysdig Monitor writes "The ability to stop and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature". Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, VMware Aria Operations for Applications, BMC TrueSight Operations Management and New Relic, whereas Sysdig Monitor is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Dynatrace.
See our list of best Container Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Container Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
