Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs Prevasio comparison

Broadcom and AlgoSec are both solutions in the Container Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.5, while AlgoSec is ranked #11. Broadcom holds a 2.8% mindshare in DCM, compared to AlgoSec’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of AlgoSec users who would recommend it.

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Read 162 Broadcom DX Application Performance Management reviews

786 Views
3 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Prevasio

Read 10 Prevasio reviews

24 Views
2 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Prevasio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

In the application management category, Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and Prevasio compete for market share. Broadcom DX APM appears to have an edge in feature set and user satisfaction, while Prevasio excels in deployment ease and cloud integration.

Features: Broadcom DX APM supports complex environments with features like Introscope and Customer Experience Manager for real-time monitoring, transaction tracing, and customizable dashboards. It provides critical metrics every few seconds. Prevasio focuses on simplified deployment, especially in hybrid cloud setups, making it suitable for organizations seeking fast and easy integration.

Room for Improvement: Broadcom DX APM could enhance dashboard flexibility and streamline installation processes. It faces criticism for its steep learning curve and documentation quality. Prevasio may improve risk analysis capabilities and compatibility across cloud environments. Innovation in solution integration could benefit both platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Broadcom DX APM supports on-premises deployments with options for public cloud integration, sometimes perceived as cumbersome. It maintains high customer service ratings, though responses can be slow. Prevasio, tailored for hybrid cloud deployment, is praised for smooth integration and reliable technical support, emphasizing flexibility in customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Broadcom DX APM's pricing is often viewed as high, possibly restrictive for smaller organizations, but some find its features justify the cost. Licensing offers savings on platform monitoring. Prevasio provides flexible pricing based on deployment scale, appealing to cloud-focused businesses. Both products are recognized for delivering good ROI, enhancing infrastructure performance, and application management support.

To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Prevasio Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Prevasio

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Ranking in Container Monitoring

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

162

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (32nd)

Prevasio

Ranking in Container Monitoring

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (41st), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Container Monitoring category, the mindshare of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is 2.8%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Prevasio is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Monitoring

Featured Reviews

aush.111

Engineer at Ooredoo Qatar

Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration

This solution still relies on inbuilt configuration. For example, I'm pretty much impressed with Dynatrace POC, where we deploy the agent with a simple click, click, click, and then that's it. And we did not build any alerts or anything. We just started getting the alerts, warnings, and everything on its own system, understood what the benchmark is and what is the threshold, and it started giving you the warnings and the caution alerts, the danger alerts. So we expect something like that should be there in Broadcom at the level. But, instead, it expects us to configure. So that is what is missing there. Even if the server CPU usage is 95%t, it doesn't harm you. It doesn't send you any alerts. We think the system is normal. So it's not normal. So this is what they should think and send you AI/ML-related alarms on their own. In future releases, I would like to see more AI and ML capabilities, which are kind of missing. Another area of improvement is its infrastructure monitoring perspective. For example, they are still using UIM, which is a good tool. But for APM, they have come to DXP. However, in terms of UIM, the unified infrastructure management, there is no DXP version or AIML version of it. So they should try to find an updated version of it so that it is not competing with the rest of the solution.

Read full review

Juan Tolosa

Production Manager at Assertiva S.A.

Automation helps reduce human error, and platform suggests the best configuration to apply

The optimizations are the most useful aspect because most customers have a very unmanaged network with a lot of rules. We use a lot of the optimizations in our reports for improving firewall rules. It also provides our clients with full visibility into the risks involved in firewall change requests and that is very important because our clients are often banks that must be in compliance with PCI. And when it comes to preparing for audits and ensuring that firewalls are in compliance, the solution is very useful. We are able to do it very fast. We can do a lot of iterations and get better policy rules all the time. Although not many of our clients are migrating to the cloud, for those that are, AlgoSec is useful. The part of the process that takes a long time is the human part. We must have gap committees and approvals that take a long time. But the integration itself is very easy with AlgoSec. We have all the information in our hands about the traffic we must enable on the cloud and for making new rules. All that is automated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It covers from mainframe, all the way to dotcom, for example. CA currently covers Amazon, Microsoft Azure, Office 365 monitoring."

"We did the setup for a new datacenter, and that was pretty straightforward."

"Command center is a new feature that provides agent maintenance and support without involving the application team. It saves lots of time for APM team."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"For the most part, we run constantly without any issue at this point because of APM."

"The time it takes to track problems in applications is the most valuable return that we have from this solution."

"The configuration and the manager tool are good features."

"Cross-platform business transaction tracing supports the ability to monitor end-to-end performance across the stack, providing granular insight into customer experience KPIs, which are a critical success factor for organizations."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pros

"We have Check Point, Palo Alto, and FortiGate firewalls, and it integrates pretty seamlessly with these firewalls. We have had no issues so far."

"The firewall policy summarization is the most valuable feature. It helps us to cross-check the firewall ruleset. That's the main purpose of it. And of course, it monitors changes of the firewall policy. It provides full visibility into the risk involved in firewall change requests. It helps us to check for any integrity issues and conflicts with other rulesets, and of course the compliance."

"The most unique feature is the ability to help fix any gaps or mismatches in the configuration of the firewall."

"The workflow and the fact that I can follow up on a request that I've created and clearly see the status it is in are the most valuable features of this solution. When I need things to move on, for example, if the security guys didn't look at the request or the implementation is not going as it should, then I can contact people. There is a mechanism in there that clearly indicates the service level agreement we have for implementation. We can see if it is being attained."

"AlgoSec has good tools to manage policies and devices. Many administrators like how it helps you monitor and clean up the policy for the on-premise firewall."

"We have used the solution to implement and manage microsegmentation initiatives. That is the whole point of modeling towards, "Hey, how will this work for a specific situation in the end?" I think it's a great solution because a lot of companies are not just going to the cloud, but microsegmentation and service-delivered products. So, I feel like it is very capable and comparatively better than its peers, if not equal."

"Because we get about 60 to 70 rules to deploy a week during the firewall maintenance window, we might create some duplicate rules or open duplicate ports. AlgoSec has become very helpful whenever we need to find out the nodes or subnets that have already been created, then we don't need to create the duplicate subnet of that particular IP address."

"The most valuable feature is the automation that can be accomplished by using scripts. If we didn't have AlgoSec, I would have to do everything manually."

More Prevasio pros

Cons

"They need to add support for new frameworks, or at least provide a broader guide/perspectives to add them to monitoring specific agents to retrieve metrics with thresholds as a reference to guide the customer as to where they must go to achieve this."

"The technical support is very poor."

"There are several areas that could be improved in Broadcom DX Application Performance Management. One of the main areas is user experience monitoring, which is currently not available. Additionally, they need to develop a solution that is compatible with OpenShift 4, as their current solution only works when an agent is installed within the image, which is not possible in OpenShift 4 as it removes the agent."

"The integration with CA Spectrum is quite difficult to create, and it is also only one way, only being used to view alarms coming from CA APM."

"We enountered stability issues. They were mitigated by performance tuning within infrastructure."

"What comes to mind when you speak of a room for improvement in Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is the infrastructure agent, but my company doesn't use it, so I can't say if it's really a problem or not, but it could be the container support or cloud support that could be improved in the solution. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is for it to have one agent for cloud and one agent for legacy, with all features included."

"The product displays some graphics and sometimes we want to have some different metrics in the same graphic but it doesn't display in the same scale, so it's quite complicated to see the metrics. If the product would be able to manage a double scale, it would be perfect."

"As applications move to the cloud, we need more cloud-based solutions from CA APM. This is currently unavailable."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management cons

"We work with multiple security vendors. It's rather difficult to integrate the vendors. AlgoSec is a platform that hasn't really been developed as much as we would like to just because of its complexity to set up. If it was easy to set up and easy to get integrations with other companies, then we would be doing it. But the thought is that we are relatively stretched thin in our team as it is and the complexity of configuring AlgoSec doesn't make it any easier."

"In the new version H32, there are many, many bugs."

"Now that we've moved to the VM it is more stable and independent of hardware."

"Integration with Oracle on the cloud is not supported. I would also like to see integrations with network devices in Layer 2."

"The technical support response time is low. This might be due to the coronavirus pandemic situation, but I am not getting full support when working with them."

"The API integration could potentially improve. I didn't get a chance to look and see how well this solution can integrate with ServiceNow or our GRC environment."

"There is a little bit of scope for improvement in the risk profiles that come with the AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer module. Currently, AlgoSec provides only three standard zones within a risk profile. These standard zones are external, internal, and DMZ. Everybody's network is divided into different zones within a data center, but AlgoSec only provides three zones. This is a limitation that I see for the risk profile analysis. If there was an option to customize these zones, it would be great."

"The analysis part can be improved when I make a flow request. There should be a clear analysis of which metric part needs to be opened and which firewalls will be opened. It should give you a bit more graphical visibility about these."

More Prevasio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Setup costs are quite competitive relative to other solutions, and simpler."

"Depends on the size of the product you need."

"It is definitely expensive for what we get, but there isn't an alternate option at the moment."

"There is some research needed to determine licensing costs, based on the number of DataPower instances for the Nastel agent, for example."

"Pricing and licensing are not issues."

"Althougth it is a bit expensive, it is really worth it"

"Broadcom is a better and cheaper option from the financial perspective. It also depends on the DLP plug."

"The licensing costs are expensive."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pricing and cost advice

"For the South American market, the prices are very high."

"I heard that the licensing was around $100,000 a year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Performing Arts

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...there is a very easy way to deal with it by adding more servers to the application.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

The initial pricing is reasonable and competitive compared to other solutions. The challenge arises during annual renewals, as the price increase can be significant, around twenty percent or more, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

The first area for improvement is the discovery feature, which should be enhanced to collect comprehensive information from applications and services. This includes using agents or scripts to gathe...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 28% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 17% of the time

New Relic vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

June 2025

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management report

Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Prevasio

June 2025

Download Prevasio product report

Also Known As

DX APM, CA APM, CA NetQoS Performance Center, Wily Introscope, CA Wily APM, CA App Experience Analytics, CA AXA

No data available

Overview

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is a cutting-edge next-generation APM that goes beyond the traditional aspects of what other APMs provide by offering fully integrated AIOPS (Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations) capabilities embedded in the solution. This enables Broadcom DX Application Performance Management better opportunities to detect anomalies faster, correctly anticipate behavior, and perform intuitive automatic corrective processes. The solution is able to provide comprehensive full stack end-to-end monitoring and deliver complete visibility and a nearly flawless user experience.

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Benefits

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has many valuable key features. Some of its most useful features include:

Improves visibility: Users gain complete 360-degree visibility with all applications, infrastructure, and end users in modern, traditional, and all cloud-based environments.
Continuous improvement: Intuitive automated feedback is provided throughout the entire software development lifecycle.
Scalability: The solution is easily scalable to the enterprise level with very easy to use administration.
Improved user experience: The solution provides intuitive dynamic insights concerning overall application performance and across the complete user journey.

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Features

There are many benefits to implementing Broadcom DX Application Performance Management. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Custom personalized dashboards: Users are able to create their own specific views based on unique task-driven individualized requirements. This allows for comprehensive intuitive cross-domain analysis of the entire ecosystem and application usage from both synthetic and real user perspectives.
Fast, straightforward deployment: The solution offers an automated, zero-touch deployment process that better facilitates the monitoring and discovery of cloud-based and container applications.
Improved administration processes: Agent administration and overall lifecycle processes are simplified, making configurations, deployments, and upgrades very simple.
Intuitive analysis: The solutions AIOPS processes provide for inherent root-cause detection and anomaly discovery to diagnose potential issues or problems immediately.
Improved visibility: Presented views are task-relevant to facilitate improved group topologies, and time-based to display the impact of performance anomalies.
Improved mapping: Relationship mapping enables users to visualize all aspects of the environment with options to deep dive across entire applications, network layers, and infrastructure.
Application support: The solution has functionality with Java, .Net, PHP, Node.js, Docker, Kubernetes, AWS, Google Cloud, and more.
Flexibility: The solution is available both on premises and as a SaaS.

Reviews from Real Users

“The most valuable feature of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management for me is transaction monitoring. “ A Peerspot user who is an Applications Engineer at a financial services firm.

“The most valuable features are the low overhead, the ability to monitor production on 24/7 principle, the ability to decrease time to discover the point of failure in the IT infrastructure or the application environment in a short period of time, reporting for analyzing the performance of the application for improving the code optimizing process.” A.Jurisic, CEO at Pio Pet d.o.o.

“What is most valuable about this solution is that it completely monitors code-level visibility. We benefit from this as we're able to capture any performance issues from an application, then raise and forward those issues to the applicable team more quickly.” S. Doddi, APM consultant at Tech Mahindra Limited

Broadcom

Prevasio is an agentless cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) that provides increased visibility into security and compliance gaps, enabling cloud operations and security teams to prioritize risks and ensure compliance with internet security benchmarks.

Prevasio combines cloud-native security with SRI International's proprietary AI capabilities and AlgoSec’s expertise in securing 1,800 of the world’s most complex organizations.

AlgoSec

Sample Customers

Lexmark, Intermountain Healthcare, National Australia Bank, BBVA Compass Bank, Innovapost, Dansk Supermarked Group, U.S. Cellular, Orange, Cetip

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Prevasio

June 2025

Free Report: Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Prevasio

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Prevasio and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Prevasio report.

See our list of best Container Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Container Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.