We performed a comparison between Bright and Seeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
Earn 20 points
A Developer-Centric Enterprise Dynamic Application Security Testing Platform.
DevOps moves quickly, and security isn’t keeping up. Developers are frustrated with security, AppSec professionals are exhausted, and security bottlenecks keep getting worse. As a result, vulnerabilities are pushed into production, increasing your organization’s risk of cyber attacks.
Bright is ranked 39th in Application Security Testing (AST) while Seeker is ranked 24th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review. Bright is rated 0.0, while Seeker is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Seeker writes "More effective than dynamic scanners, but is missing useful learning capabilities". Bright is most compared with , whereas Seeker is most compared with Synopsys API Security Testing, Coverity, Contrast Security Assess, Polaris Software Integrity Platform and SonarQube.
See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.