Bright vs Seeker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bright Logo
148 views|61 comparisons
Synopsys Logo
705 views|516 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bright and Seeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: February 2024).
755,666 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing for Seeker is user-based and for 50 users I believe it costs about $70,000 per year."
  • More Seeker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    755,666 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:A significant advantage of Seeker is that it is an interactive scanner, and we have found it to be much more effective in reducing the amount of false positives than dynamic scanners such as AppScan… more »
    Top Answer:The licensing for Seeker is user-based and for 50 users I believe it costs about $70,000 per year.
    Top Answer:One area that Seeker can improve is to make it more customizable. All security scanning tools have a defined set of rules that are based on certain criteria which they will use to detect issues… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    148
    Comparisons
    61
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    705
    Comparisons
    516
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,632
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NexPloit, NexDast
    Learn More
    Overview

    A Developer-Centric Enterprise Dynamic Application Security Testing Platform.

    DevOps moves quickly, and security isn’t keeping up. Developers are frustrated with security, AppSec professionals are exhausted, and security bottlenecks keep getting worse. As a result, vulnerabilities are pushed into production, increasing your organization’s risk of cyber attacks.

    Seeker®, interactive application security testing (IAST) solution, gives you unparalleled visibility into your modern web, cloud based and microservices based app security posture. It automatically verifies, prioritizes and reports on critical vulnerabilities in real time. It identifies vulnerability trends against compliance standards (e.g., OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, GDPR, CAPEC, and CWE/SANS Top 25). Seeker enables security teams to identify and track sensitive data to ensure that it is handled securely and not stored in log files or databases with weak or no encryption. Seeker’s seamless integration into CI/CD workflows enables fast interactive application security testing at DevOps speed.
    Sample Customers
    Britannica, Shufersal, Qualitest, PremFina, playtech, Phoenix
    El Al Airlines and Société Française du Radiotelephone
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    February 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: February 2024.
    755,666 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bright is ranked 39th in Application Security Testing (AST) while Seeker is ranked 24th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review. Bright is rated 0.0, while Seeker is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Seeker writes "More effective than dynamic scanners, but is missing useful learning capabilities". Bright is most compared with , whereas Seeker is most compared with Synopsys API Security Testing, Coverity, Contrast Security Assess, Polaris Software Integrity Platform and SonarQube.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.