Boxafe vs Rubrik Go comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
QNAP Logo
158 views|113 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Rubrik Logo
1,699 views|621 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boxafe and Rubrik Go based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two SaaS Backup solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Boxafe vs. Rubrik Go Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ryan Dave Brigino
Josua Taljaard
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the tool's reliability. Its price is also cheap, and it gets delivered in two days.""The most valuable feature was the repository."

More Boxafe Pros →

"We use the solution as a backup for our virtual environment and SQL databases.""In terms of stability, the product is good.""Rubrik Go's best feature is data visualization.""The standout feature is its ransomware protection capabilities.""It has an easy-to-use interface that is not complicated.""The most valuable feature is the storage efficiency, as the storage footprint is very good.""Rubrik Go is very simple to use.""The solution is easy to install; our team just has to put together the plan, give it to IT and let them handle it. Other solutions are quite complex, but this is much simpler."

More Rubrik Go Pros →

Cons
"Boxafe's pricing policy should be more flexible.""There is room for improvement in the pricing. This is the issue, the reason why we started using Synology."

More Boxafe Cons →

"I believe there's room for improvement in terms of support, particularly with Tier 3 support coming from the on-call team.""If you were to compare it to, say, EMC, the availability of the documentation, training programs, and end-user education aren't as good. Rubrik could improve this.""I would like to see better integration with applications, such as those from Microsoft, to make backing up from those applications simpler.""If you're going for Rubrik, you are not opting for the tape library because Rubrik doesn't have the fiber cable connected to the tape library.""The tool's pricing needs to be improved.""Being a modern backup solution, Rubrik should have an option to back up a Kubernetes cluster.""You should be able to add more workloads to Rubrik Go.""Integration with the client is something that needs to be improved."

More Rubrik Go Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The tool's price is cheap. I rate it five out of ten."
  • More Boxafe Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This is a very costly solution."
  • "Rubrik Go is more cost-effective than similar solutions by other vendors."
  • "It's an expensive product if you compare it to traditional backup solutions; however, if you compare it as a total cost of ownership for a solution, it is not."
  • "Rubrick Go is quite expensive - I would rate its pricing four out of ten."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a seven out of ten. The solution's costs are monthly."
  • More Rubrik Go Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SaaS Backup solutions are best for your needs.
    770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like the tool's reliability. Its price is also cheap, and it gets delivered in two days.
    Top Answer:The tool's price is cheap. I rate it five out of ten.
    Top Answer:Boxafe's pricing policy should be more flexible.
    Top Answer:The standout feature is its ransomware protection capabilities.
    Top Answer:I would rate the product's pricing a seven out of ten. The solution's costs are monthly.
    Top Answer:I believe there's room for improvement in terms of support, particularly with Tier 3 support coming from the on-call team. In instances where we've had incidents, the turnaround time for support… more »
    Ranking
    15th
    out of 76 in SaaS Backup
    Views
    158
    Comparisons
    113
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    331
    Rating
    8.0
    8th
    out of 76 in SaaS Backup
    Views
    1,699
    Comparisons
    621
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    286
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Back up Google™ Workspace and Microsoft 365® to the QNAP NAS, on-premise, or cloud
    Boxafe is a comprehensive solution for backing up/recovering SaaS data to QNAP NAS, on-prem servers, or cloud storage spaces. Ensure the safety of your business by centrally managing multiple domains and accounts.

    Rubrik Go is a comprehensive data management solution offered by Rubrik, designed to simplify and streamline data protection and management processes. With Rubrik Go, organizations can efficiently manage their data across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, ensuring data availability, security, and compliance.

    Rubrik Go provides a unified platform for the backup, recovery, replication, and archival of data, eliminating the need for multiple-point solutions. It offers a simple and intuitive user interface, enabling users to easily manage and monitor their data protection operations. With its policy-driven automation, Rubrik Go automates routine tasks, reducing manual efforts and improving operational efficiency.

    One of the key features of Rubrik Go is its cloud-native architecture, which enables seamless integration with public cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. This allows organizations to leverage the scalability and cost-effectiveness of the cloud while ensuring data protection and management consistency across environments.

    Rubrik Go also offers advanced data security capabilities, including encryption, access controls, and data immutability, ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of data. It provides comprehensive reporting and analytics, giving organizations insights into their data protection operations and helping them make informed decisions.

    With flexible subscription-based pricing, Rubrik Go offers organizations a cost-effective and scalable solution for their data management needs. It eliminates the need for upfront capital investments and provides the flexibility to scale resources based on changing business requirements.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Public Consulting Group
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Boxafe vs. Rubrik Go
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Boxafe vs. Rubrik Go and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Boxafe is ranked 15th in SaaS Backup with 2 reviews while Rubrik Go is ranked 8th in SaaS Backup with 10 reviews. Boxafe is rated 8.0, while Rubrik Go is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boxafe writes "Serves as a backup repository and storage solution and easy to setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik Go writes "Robust ransomware protection, scalability, and suitability for enterprise environments makes it a top choice for data management needs". Boxafe is most compared with Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, whereas Rubrik Go is most compared with AWS Backup, Commvault Cloud and Own Backup and Recovery. See our Boxafe vs. Rubrik Go report.

    See our list of best SaaS Backup vendors.

    We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.