We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Palantir Foundry based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"It has been a stable product."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"The interface is really user-friendly."
"The virtualization tool is useful."
"The ease of use is my favorite feature. We're able to build different models and projects or combine different projects to build one use case."
"Great features available in one tool."
"The data lineage is great."
"It is easy to map out a workflow and run trigger-based scripts without having to deploy to another server."
"Encapsulates all the components without the requirement to integrate or check compatibility."
"Palantir Foundry is a robust platform that has really strong plugin connectors and provides features for real-time integration."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"Difficult to receive data from external sources."
"Some error messages can be very cryptic."
"There is not a wide user base for the solution's online documentation so it is sometimes difficult to find answers."
"The workflow could be improved."
"The data lineage was challenging. It's hard to track data from the sources as it moves through stages. Informatica EDC can easily capture and report it because it talks to the metadata. This is generated across those various staging points."
"Cost of this solution is quite high."
"It would be helpful to build applications based on Azure functions or web apps in Palantir Foundry."
"If you want to create new models on specific data sets, computing that is quite costly."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Palantir Foundry is ranked 11th in Data Integration with 13 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Palantir Foundry is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palantir Foundry writes "The data visualization is fantastic and the security is excellent". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and AWS Glue, whereas Palantir Foundry is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Palantir Gotham, SAP Data Services, AWS Glue and Alteryx Designer. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Palantir Foundry report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
