Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi iPaaS vs Magic xpi Integration Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Magic xpi Integration Platform
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
24th
Average Rating
3.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 11.3%, up from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Magic xpi Integration Platform is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Eugene Paden - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration solution proves maturity and drives productivity
There are many features we're using. We're starting to do AI now regarding integration with other platforms, focusing on creating integrations. A significant area for improvement is version control. Currently, you develop and cannot properly roll back to a previous version unless you create different versions. With proper version control, you could know which version to revert to and test other versions.
it_user977634 - PeerSpot reviewer
A low-performing integration tool
We use it as an in-house back-type integration tool. It allows us to have different integrations between different systems It does not perform well. It needs more reusable components that are unlimited in time. Furthermore, it relies on the files systems and does not create components, so it is…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The stability of the solution is OK."
 

Cons

"Documentation could be improved."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It is not performing well."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is not reasonable at all. It's very high."
"The Platinum package is good for licensing, but I’m not sure about the cost and improvements."
"Approximately 20k annually."
"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is expensive. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."
"This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."
"The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."
"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Non Profit
5%
Retailer
14%
Printing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Performing Arts
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Boomi
Magic xpi Integration Platform, iBOLT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
Godrej Properties
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.