BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs OpenText AI Operations Management comparison

BMC and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. BMC is ranked #45, while OpenText is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.3. BMC holds a 0.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

455 Views
177 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Read 48 OpenText AI Operations Management reviews

1,190 Views
345 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText AI Operations Management and BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management compete in optimizing IT operations and cloud environments. While OpenText offers cost and support benefits, BMC's extensive functionality appeals to those valuing feature-rich solutions.

Features: OpenText AI Operations Management focuses on predictive analytics, automated incident management, and integration capabilities. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers robust cloud orchestration, multi-cloud management, and efficient resource provisioning.

Room for Improvement: OpenText may benefit from enhanced multi-cloud integration, streamlined user interfaces, and broader functionality beyond predictive analytics. BMC could improve by reducing the complexity of its feature set, optimizing initial setup costs, and better tailoring support for smaller organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC enhances deployment with extensive support resources and an intuitive setup process. OpenText provides strong deployment assistance but might face challenges due to a steeper learning curve, potentially resulting in slower initial setups.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText AI Operations Management is cost-effective, offering a faster ROI by optimizing IT processes with lower initial costs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management, despite higher initial investment, promises long-term ROI through its advanced multi-cloud efficiencies, justifying the price for cloud-centric approaches.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. OpenText AI Operations Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (39th)

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

29th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (8th), IT Operations Analytics (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText AI Operations Management is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Powerful data integration, comprehensive automation, and hybrid compatibility

The data lake is a very powerful feature within OpenText Operations Bridge. It can integrate with any BI tool to collect AI data and perform a variety of functions. It offers hybrid compatibility and supports desktop application customization and cloud integration. Another essential capability is server automation, which became significantly easier with the software appliance for deployment. This solution also provides role-based access that enhances data privacy and security.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"OpsBridge has good event correlation facilities and root-cause identification algorithms."

"The correlation feature is the most used feature. It allows you to correlate events from different sources and have more meaningful events."

"I've found the solution to be very scalable."

"I find the Micro Focus Operations Bridge dashboard valuable, including its instrument analysis and anomaly control features that help indicate root causes and problems with your infrastructure."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its grouping scripts and event focus."

"We haven't faced any stability issues. There hasn't been any crashes or glitches."

"The event correlation is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"The integration with the ticketing tool makes sure that there is a record for every issue."

More OpenText AI Operations Management pros

Cons

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"The dashboards from OpenText Operations Bridge, when compared to those from Splunk, are less visually appealing."

"The pricing could be improved."

"The setup process can get a little bit complex."

"We need improvements in delivering quality reports from OBM and in integrating Operations Bridge with other components like UCMDB for asset discovery."

"The initial setup of this tool is complex for people who lack experience with it."

"The deployment of agents on new CI should be improved. There should be some kind of automation to directly deploy them from the console. It can maybe have some more AI functions because most of the other tools are going in that direction."

"The pricing is a bit expensive for smaller companies."

"The initial setup is a little bit complex."

More OpenText AI Operations Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost is very high."

"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."

"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."

"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."

"It is competitive."

"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."

"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours. What used to be done manually by a person is now done automatically. With its automation capabilities...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

The only aspect I find lacking in OpenText Operations Bridge is more aesthetic. The dashboards from OpenText Operations Bridge, when compared to those from Splunk, are less visually appealing. Splu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

We use OpenText Operations Bridge ( /products/opentext-operations-bridge-reviews ) more from an event correlation perspective. We do not use it for pure monitoring since we have other monitoring to...

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 59% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 41% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

OpsRamp vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 22% of the time

SCOM vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 21% of the time

BMC Helix Monitor vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 15% of the time

Zabbix vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 11% of the time

BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText AI Operations Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

June 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AI Operations Management

June 2025

OpenText AI Operations Management report

Download OpenText AI Operations Management product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

OpenText AI Operations Management centralizes event correlation and monitoring across infrastructures, prioritizing scalability and automation for efficient alert management. It empowers organizations with transparency and insights essential for effective IT resource management in hybrid cloud environments.

OpenText AI Operations Management offers comprehensive solutions for event correlation, integration, and centralized alert management. With capabilities that streamline operations, this tool supports efficient IT management across AWS, GCP, and on-premises environments. Despite requiring improvements in performance and usability, its robust reporting and seamless monitoring provide valuable insights for root cause analysis. Users leverage this platform to integrate event data, automate incidents, and manage hybrid infrastructures effectively, making it a key component in enhancing service perspectives globally. Its heavy architecture and reliance on Java and Flash, coupled with complex licensing and pricing, necessitate attention to functionality and support areas.

What are the key features of OpenText AI Operations Management?

Event Correlation: Integrates and correlates event data for improved incident response.
Centralized Alerts: Raises alerts efficiently to streamline IT operations.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Consolidates information for better visibility.
Hybrid Cloud Support: Manages AWS, GCP, and on-premises environments.
Automation: Enhances operations with server automation and performance management.

What benefits do users find with OpenText AI Operations Management?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines IT processes for quicker issue resolution.
Transparency: Offers robust reporting and data centralization for clarity.
Resource Management: Improves management of IT resources and service perspectives.
Scalability: Accommodates growth with flexible architecture.
Noise Reduction: Decreases event noise to enhance response efficiency.

OpenText AI Operations Management is widely implemented in industries requiring comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Organizations benefit from its ability to consolidate tools and manage events effectively across hybrid environments. The integration of incident automation and performance evaluation tools is particularly beneficial for those looking to enhance compliance support and reduce response times. Despite some challenges, the platform remains a valuable asset in managing complex IT environments and improving operational effectiveness.

OpenText

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

June 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. OpenText AI Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. OpenText AI Operations Management report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.