Blueriq vs IBM Case Foundation comparison

Blueriq and IBM are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Blueriq is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Blueriq holds a 0.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to IBM’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Blueriq users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Blueriq

Read 2 Blueriq reviews

284 Views
284 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Case Foundation

Read 14 IBM Case Foundation reviews

416 Views
412 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Blueriq

IBM Case Foundation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 5, 2025

Blueriq and IBM Case Foundation are competing products in business process management and case handling. IBM Case Foundation seems to have the upper hand due to its robust features, which justify its pricing despite Blueriq's advantage in pricing and support.

Features: Blueriq provides agility, a model-driven approach, and rapid application development. IBM Case Foundation offers scalability, enterprise integration, and powerful analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Blueriq supports swift deployment with intuitive tools and solid customer service. IBM Case Foundation has comprehensive support resources and a global network, despite being slightly more complex to deploy.

Pricing and ROI: Blueriq offers transparent pricing with lower initial setup costs, enhancing ROI through reduced overheads. IBM Case Foundation, with higher initial investment, delivers compelling ROI through its extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Blueriq

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Case Foundation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Blueriq is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Case Foundation is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Case Foundation	0.5%
Blueriq	0.3%
Other	99.2%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

ChrisBiemans

Business Consultant at Ziggo Services B.V.

Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities

We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers for pests and diseases before allowing entry into the EU. The platform plays a vital role in…

Read full review

Nouman Nawaz

Deputy Director - IT(Plans) at DHA Lahore

Mature product in terms of security and stable product

The architecture is a bit difficult, but in BAW, they introduced the Business Automation Workflow. It's a bit easier compared to Case Manager. Currently, we use Case Manager, so it's a bit difficult to upgrade and handle, but BAW is comparatively much better and easier to handle. The limitation is only for customization because IBM doesn't support it. In some scenarios, if you want some business processes to be customized, we have already spoken two or three times with IBM representatives that we have to customize some of the features in this business process. They would say that if you want to do this automation at your own end, then okay, fine, go ahead, but we are not supporting all this customization. The only thing is the customization because it's a complete standard application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."

"The content management is great."

"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."

"The only thing is that we can easily track where the application is in the process, from manual to automation."

"The solution is scalable."

"A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting."

"The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."

"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."

"Case Foundation provides a strong security boost."

More IBM Case Foundation pros

Cons

"The platform's initial setup process could be better."

"There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings."

"The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications."

"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."

"The cloud version could use more stability."

"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."

"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."

More IBM Case Foundation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."

"This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."

"IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."

"Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Everest Blueriq?

The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Everest Blueriq?

The platform's initial setup process could be better.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Everest Blueriq?

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Case Foundation?

A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Case Foundation?

The tool is expensive for my customers; it is very expensive, more than other solutions. Some customers say it is more expensive. The license cost for Cloud Pak is per user and increases with the n...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Case Foundation?

We face some challenges with IBM Case Foundation from our customers, particularly with administration and configuration. We face many issues and open tickets with IBM regarding that, especially som...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pega Platform vs Blueriq

Compared 50% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Blueriq

Compared 25% of the time

Studio Creatio vs Blueriq

Compared 25% of the time

More Blueriq Competitors

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 40% of the time

IBM BPM vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 33% of the time

OpenText MBPM vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 28% of the time

More IBM Case Foundation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download Blueriq product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Case Foundation

September 2025

Download IBM Case Foundation product report

Also Known As

Blueriq, Aquima

Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager

Overview

Blueriq offers a sophisticated platform designed for creating adaptive applications with a focus on improving business processes across sectors. It empowers developers to generate solutions that align closely with business needs.

Blueriq stands out by enabling stakeholders to collaboratively innovate through model-driven development. Its platform supports rapid iteration and deployment of applications, allowing for seamless adaptation to changing business workflows. This dynamic tool enhances engagement and operational efficiency, catering specifically to sectors looking for robust process automation and optimization capabilities.

What are Blueriq's most crucial features?

Model-driven development: Enables collaborative application creation using a visual approach.
Rule Engine: Offers efficiency with powerful business logic integration.
Case Management: Enhances workflow automation focused on case-based methods.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with existing technologies to enhance functionality.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines operations, reducing time and resource expenditures.
Flexibility: Easily adapts to process changes for optimal alignment with business advancements.
Scalability: Grows with business needs, ensuring long-term viability.
Cost-Effectiveness: Decreases dependency on custom development, lowering expenses.

Blueriq is implemented across industries such as finance and healthcare, where it drives digitization of processes and enhances case management efficiency. These sectors benefit from its capability to swiftly adapt applications to meet industry-specific regulations and demands, ensuring compliance and competitive advantage.

Blueriq

IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.

IBM

Sample Customers

Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg

Suncorp Group Limited

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, SAP and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.