BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs Cisco Meeting Server comparison

Verizon and Cisco are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Verizon is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while Cisco is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0. Verizon holds a 0.8% mindshare in VM, compared to Cisco’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Verizon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Read 4 BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] reviews

180 Views
176 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Meeting Server

Read 5 Cisco Meeting Server reviews

729 Views
729 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Cisco Meeting Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 28, 2025

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] and Cisco Meeting Server compete in the online meeting space, with Cisco having the upper hand due to its robust features, advanced security, and deployment flexibility for enterprise-level solutions.

Features: BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] offers effective interoperability, seamless tool integration, and HD video quality. Cisco Meeting Server provides comprehensive security features, supports large-scale deployments, and offers unified communication capabilities.

Room for Improvement: BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] could enhance its enterprise features, scalability, and integration capabilities for more extensive deployments. Cisco Meeting Server could improve its user interface, simplify its configuration process, and reduce deployment complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] facilitates easy cloud-based deployment and accessible support services for agility. Cisco Meeting Server offers intricate on-premises and hybrid deployments with extensive customer service for complex integration support.

Pricing and ROI: BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] provides lower upfront costs for a quick ROI, while Cisco Meeting Server requires higher initial investment yet promises strong ROI through its scalable architecture and enterprise features.

To learn more, read our detailed BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs. Cisco Meeting Server Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs. Cisco Meeting Server

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 866,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

14th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco Meeting Server

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Meeting Server is 6.4%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtual Meetings Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco Meeting Server	6.4%
BlueJeans Meetings	0.8%
Other	92.8%

Virtual Meetings

Featured Reviews

Saurabh Srivastav

Solutions Architect-Hybrid Cloud and Automation at Red Hat

Accommodates large meetings with up to 500 participants, and I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly

As per company policy, most internal meetings happen through Google Meet, but for large-scale meetings with more than 500 participants, we use BlueJeans Meetings. It's more like a broadcast meeting platform, which Google Meet doesn't allow The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings…

Read full review

Ahmed Elrayes

Voice Network Engineer at Raya Integration

A scalable tool useful to hold conferences and video meetings

I use Cisco Meeting Server for conferences and video meetings, which are crucial for my company The share screen option available during conferences is one of the best features of Cisco Meeting Server. In Cisco Meeting Server, GUI is an area of concern where improvements are required. In the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings with up to 500 participants. The sound quality is also better on BlueJeans. I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly."

"It is really easy and there are no complicated graphics or icons. It is simple and has an intuitive design. It's user-friendly over anything else I have used."

"The quality of both audio and video is good."

"It is available in all flavors. You can use it in the browser, and you can use it on an Android phone for which a BlueJeans app is available. I use an Android phone, so I only know about Android. So, you can join a meeting from the application installed on your phone or from the mobile browser, or you can use it from a laptop or a PC."

"The UI is user-friendly and very good overall."

"Cisco Meeting Server is an easy and less complex solution."

"What I like most about Cisco Meeting Server is its quick management. The solution also has a straightforward configuration."

"You can use the Cisco Meeting Server to set up conference calls and virtual meetings. Those are the two primary functions of Meeting Server. Most people in the company are using Microsoft Teams, so we only use Meeting Server when we have an internal meeting for all staff."

"The share screen option available during conferences is one of the best features of Cisco Meeting Server."

Cons

"BlueJeans doesn't allow as much customization of your background in a video call, so that could be improved."

"Its cost is very high. If you sell it in India, which is a price-conscious market, the prices should be as per the market competition. You cannot charge the rates that are applicable in the US. They should tailor it to the local market. It should be in line with what the competition is offering."

"I haven't had any big challenges. The annotation feature should be improved. So if I need to mark something or point something out, it's there, but it's not that user friendly. Other than that it's fine. In terms of collaboration, I think there could be some improvement."

"Screen sharing is available but there is no feature for remote access, to take control of another machine."

"Cisco Meeting Server should include a feature to control another user's screen during a remote session."

"This is a difficult solution to install and it should be made easier."

"A few features are missing on the Meetings app, like a recording function. My understanding is that you need to buy a separate recording solution. It's modular, so you have to enable some functions if you want to use them. For example, we had to enable the Mood function. Recording is the primary feature we'd like to see in the app."

"In Cisco Meeting Server, GUI is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"What would make Cisco Meeting Server better is integrating it with Zoom and Teams so that you can connect or make a call through any of the two third-party solutions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I once tried buying it for myself, but it was very costly. It is quite expensive as compared to other solutions. With BlueJeans, there are carrier charges if you call the toll-free number. The customer doesn't pay for the call, but the buyer or the subscriber of BlueJeans has to pay for it. That is where BlueJeans becomes very costly, and that is where Google, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom are very helpful because you don't have to pay these charges."

"Price-wise, Cisco Meeting Server is a product that falls in a mid-range category."

"Licensing fees are billed yearly."

"Cisco Meeting Server has reasonable licensing costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

866,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BlueJeans Meetings?

The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings with up to 500 participants. The sound quality is also better on BlueJeans. I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BlueJeans Meetings?

In future releases, I would like to see maybe customized virtual backgrounds, like Google Meet has. BlueJeans doesn't allow as much customization of your background in a video call, so that could b...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BlueJeans Meetings?

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. I would recommend using it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Cisco Meeting Server?

Cisco Meeting Server is an easy and less complex solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Meeting Server?

Price-wise, Cisco Meeting Server is a product that falls in a mid-range category.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Meeting Server?

Cisco Meeting Server should include a feature to control another user's screen during a remote session.

See all answers

Comparisons

Skype for Business vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] Competitors

Webex vs Cisco Meeting Server

Compared 35% of the time

Pexip vs Cisco Meeting Server

Compared 23% of the time

Zoom Workplace Business vs Cisco Meeting Server

Compared 14% of the time

Skype for Business vs Cisco Meeting Server

Compared 9% of the time

Polycom RealPresence Clariti vs Cisco Meeting Server

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco Meeting Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

August 2025

Download BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

August 2025

Download Cisco Meeting Server product report

Also Known As

BlueJeans Network

Acano

Overview

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] offered a versatile conferencing experience for businesses, featuring seamless integration and advanced capabilities for professional communication.

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was known for enhancing virtual collaboration. It enabled companies to conduct efficient meetings with robust support for audio, video, and content sharing. Benefiting from extensive compatibility across platforms, it was adaptable to different technological setups within enterprises.

What are the key features of BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]?

Cross-Platform Compatibility: Accessible on various devices ensuring flexibility.
HD Video and Audio: Provides crisp and clear conferencing quality.
Content Sharing: Facilitates easy sharing of documents and presentations.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with tools like Microsoft Teams and Slack.

What should users consider in reviews for ROI?

Enhanced Productivity: Simplifies meeting setups and participation.
Cost-Efficiency: Streamlined communication reducing travel expenses.
Reliable Security: Provides secure communication channels.
Customer Support: Access to responsive and helpful technical assistance.

In industries such as healthcare and education, BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was instrumental in supporting remote consultations and virtual classrooms. It promoted effective engagement between professionals and clients, highlighting its adaptability to diverse professional requirements.

Verizon

Cisco Meeting Server brings premises-based video, audio, and web communication together to meet the collaboration needs of the modern workplace. It works with third-party devices, and provides an enjoyable and intuitive user experience. It also scales easily, and can be purchased using our all-in-one, user-based multiparty licensing offer.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Criteo, Seattle Children's Hospital, The Wharton School, Wikia, Telit, Epilepsy, NENW, IPENZ, Medanta, Mphasis, Royal Academy of Dance, Wharton, Red Hat, HKS Architects, Forum of the Future, Commonfund

Starz

Buyer's Guide

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs. Cisco Meeting Server

July 2025

Free Report: BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs. Cisco Meeting Server

Find out what your peers are saying about BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs. Cisco Meeting Server and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

866,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs. Cisco Meeting Server report.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.