BlazeMeter vs Cavisson NetStorm comparison

Perforce and Cavisson are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Perforce is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Cavisson is ranked #20. Perforce holds a 8.2% mindshare in LTT, compared to Cavisson’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Cavisson users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

4,179 Views
3,260 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Cavisson NetStorm

Read 3 Cavisson NetStorm reviews

233 Views
233 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

Cavisson NetStorm

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

BlazeMeter and Cavisson NetStorm are competitors in the performance testing market. BlazeMeter has an upper hand in ease of use, while Cavisson NetStorm stands out in feature depth and customization.

Features: BlazeMeter offers cloud-based load testing, seamless CI/CD pipeline integration, and real-time reporting. Cavisson NetStorm provides in-depth analytics, customizable dashboards, and real-world traffic simulation capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter supports quick deployment and intuitive operation with reliable customer service, fitting for agile environments. Cavisson NetStorm requires extensive setup with detailed configurations, offering comprehensive support for complex testing needs.

Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter starts with a lower setup cost, delivering ongoing returns over time. Cavisson NetStorm requires a higher initial investment but offers substantial ROI for enterprises needing detailed performance testing.

To learn more, read our detailed BlazeMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (3rd), Functional Testing Tools (9th), API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (5th)

Cavisson NetStorm

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

20th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 8.2%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cavisson NetStorm is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BlazeMeter	8.2%
Cavisson NetStorm	1.3%
Other	90.5%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

reviewer1329360

Performance Architect at Kohl's

Has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase

NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage. NetStorm has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase. One more great functionality is the ability to control the load runtime by increasing or decreasing the virtual users or pausing the users to keep on repeating the transactions without exiting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers flexibility with its configurations."

"It has helped us simulate heavy load situations so we can fix performance issues ahead of time."

"The orchestration feature is the most valuable. It's like the tourist backend component of BlazeMeter. It allows me to essentially give BlazeMeter multiple JMeter scripts and a YAML file, and it will orchestrate and execute that load test and all those scripts as I define them."

"Running from the cloud with load distribution, exhibiting load from different geo-regions. Generating the load from different cloud regions is the best feature."

"There is a repository of all the scripts that we have created. You can go back and compare tests to see what the tests looked like. If I want to go and compare something with whatever happened six months or one year back, I can do that."

"The stability is good."

"With the help of the Mock Services, we are overcoming everything. Wherever we are facing issues, whether they will be long term or temporary, by implementing the Mock Services we can bypass the faulty components that are not needed for our particular testing."

"In our company, various teams use BlazeMeter, particularly appreciating its cloud license software, which supports up to 5,000 users. BlazeMeter's cloud capabilities allow us to load test or simulate traffic from any location worldwide, such as Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and even specific cities like Delhi. So, with one cloud license, we can simulate user load from various locations globally."

More BlazeMeter pros

"NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage."

"This tool helps to focus on real-time transactions that occur at a very high rate."

"Designs dynamic scripts and scenarios, as per our requirements, which is one the most important feature available in NetStorm. It helps us to do performance testing of our application in a periodic way."

Cons

"The scanning capability needs improvement."

"The Timeline Report panel has no customization options. One feature that I missed was not having a time filter, which I had in ELK. For example, there are only filter requests for a time of less than 5 seconds."

"From a performance perspective, BlazeMeter needs to be improved...BlazeMeter has not found the extensions for WebSockets or Java Applet."

"Having more options for customization would be helpful."

"We encountered some minor bugs, and I would like to have the ability to add load generators to workspaces without having to use APIs. We can't do that now, so we're beholden to the APIs."

"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."

"I believe that data management and test server virtualization are things that Perforce is working on, or should be working on."

"The pricing is high"

More BlazeMeter cons

"In the next release, we are looking for a JS instrumentation feature that would be helpful in identifying client-side issues at an early stage, or during testing."

"Need to add or support some more APIs in the Script Manager window."

"The user interface had to be improved for the product. Its user interface should be made simple and easy to customize as per user needs."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is free and open source."

"I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive."

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"The overall product is less costly than our past solutions, so we've absolutely saved money."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"My company has opted for a pay-as-you-go model, so we don't make use of the free version of the product."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"NetStorm is priced well when compared to many well-known tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 28% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 11% of the time

k6 Open Source vs BlazeMeter

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 5% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Cavisson NetStorm

Compared 100% of the time

More Cavisson NetStorm Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

December 2025

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

November 2025

Download Cavisson NetStorm product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

No data available

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

Cavisson NetStorm is a powerful load testing solution that is designed to enable application developers to greatly improve the way their applications function. It employs advanced software that enables it to perform many different tasks. This flexibility gives administrators the ability to test their applications in the way that best meets their needs. Cavisson NetStorm offers users the ability to scale their testing environments. These aspects of the solution are only a couple of the reasons that this platform is the load testing tool of choice of several fortune 100 corporations.

Cavisson NetStorm Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying Cavisson NetStorm include:

Cost-effectiveness. Cavisson NetStorm is a cost-effective solution that is well worth the price. The wealth of features and the sort of tasks that Cavisson NetStorm can be employed to accomplish make it possible for organizations to create products that perform at peak effectiveness. It starts with a free trial that becomes a quote-based price.

Ease of use. Cavisson NetStorm is intuitive to use so that organizations do not need to formally train employees in its use. Its design saves developers time and makes organizations more productive.

High level of stability. Cavisson NetStorm users don’t need to be concerned that it will crash or suffer other performance-related issues when it handles large test loads. It is extremely stable and can easily handle heavy workloads without suffering from an outage. Administrators can let the solution do its work while maintaining peace of mind.

Gain deep insights into application behaviors. Administrators can leverage Cavisson NetStorm’s monitoring features to observe many different aspects of the application testing process. One such aspect is the way that the applications behave when they are exposed to certain environment types. Users can obtain in-depth insights as the tests run that will help them understand how their applications function in specific situations.

Cavisson NetStorm Features

Some of the many useful features Cavisson NetStorm has to offer include:

Diagnostic alert capabilities. Cavisson NetStorm allows users to create diagnostic warnings prior to the commencement of testing. These alerts warn users when deviations from their pre-set testing parameters are taking place. If the application is behaving in a way that is abnormal, these alerts will make sure that administrators are aware of what is going on.

Test result reporting tools. Cavisson NetStorm offers administrators the ability to create test result reports that can clearly lay out information belonging to a number of different categories. It has prefabricated reporting templates that enable users to illustrate the kinds of information that is most important to them.

Testing dashboards. Cavisson NetStorm comes with a central dashboard that can visually lay out various testing metrics for administrators to view. It also includes dashboards that enable users to view technical or business-related data exclusively.

Performance analysis. Cavisson NetStorm can analyze how specific components of the application are impacting its overall performance. If there is any portion that is negatively impacting its performance, Cavisson NetStorm’s analytical tools will find them so that administrators can remedy the problem.

Cavisson

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Oracle, Macy's, Redbox, art.com, Pronto Networks, A10 Networks, Renesas, San Jose Medical Group

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm

December 2025

Free Report: BlazeMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm

Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlazeMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.