

BizTalk Server and CMW Tracker compete in the enterprise software market, focusing on integration and project management solutions. BizTalk Server excels in enterprise integration, while CMW Tracker is favored for project management due to higher user satisfaction with its features.
Features: BizTalk Server supports complex enterprise integrations, robust transaction management, and reliable messaging. CMW Tracker offers powerful workflow automation, customizable processes, and project management tools.
Room for Improvement: BizTalk Server could improve by simplifying integration configurations, enhancing cloud adapter offerings, and speeding up deployment time. CMW Tracker could benefit from more advanced reporting features, improved user interface customization, and expanded integration capabilities with external systems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CMW Tracker boasts straightforward deployment with intuitive setup and strong customer support. BizTalk Server requires extensive configuration but provides comprehensive documentation and professional services to aid deployment.
Pricing and ROI: BizTalk Server incurs higher initial setup costs due to enterprise-grade needs but promises ROI through integration efficiency. CMW Tracker offers competitive pricing with quicker ROI for streamlined project management and workflow automation.
Now the direction is to move away from BizTalk Server to IBM WebMethods, which has more features compared to BizTalk Server.
BizTalk Server's ROI is comparatively higher than Boomi and Workato.
It is time for low-code, no-code, and a quick go-to-market should be faster.
BizTalk Server is good for small companies but not for big companies.
BizTalk Server's stability rates about eight or nine out of ten.
We initially planned to move to Azure Integration Services, but there are challenges with AIS, so now we are evaluating WebMethods IO.
BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages.
The only thing I heard is that it's not inexpensive.
Boomi has advantages over BizTalk Server because it is more flexible, low-code, no-code, easy to implement, and has a fast go-to-market.
BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| BizTalk Server | 1.1% |
| CMW Tracker | 1.1% |
| Other | 97.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
CMW Tracker offers a browser-accessible workflow management platform supporting low code development with features such as team collaboration and excellent customer service. Users value its affordability and ability to enhance transparency and standardize processes.
CMW Tracker streamlines project management by allowing non-technical users to create workflows, manage tasks, and synchronize tools efficiently. This platform emphasizes ease of deployment and modification, bringing transparency and clarity to processes while enabling workflow automation. Its user-friendly design, robust analytics, and cost-effectiveness make it a favored choice for organizations needing efficient workflow management.
What are the main features of CMW Tracker?CMW Tracker is widely implemented across industries requiring efficient workflow management, particularly in settings where collaboration and process transparency are critical. Organizations benefit from its ability to standardize operations, reduce IT dependency, and enhance service delivery by enabling seamless communication among dispersed team members working on joint projects.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.