Bitbar vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

SmartBear and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #28, while Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.4. SmartBear holds a 1.3% mindshare in FT, compared to Microsoft’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Bitbar

Read 3 Bitbar reviews

760 Views
570 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

1,306 Views
562 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Bitbar

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Visual Studio Test Professional and Bitbar compete in software testing tools. Visual Studio Test Professional appears to have an edge in support and pricing, while Bitbar offers comprehensive features and flexibility.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional provides integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, enhancing test management and execution. It supports manual and exploratory testing. Bitbar offers a broad range of device support and cloud-based testing capabilities, allowing for parallel execution and scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional offers seamless deployment with Microsoft products, with extensive documentation and support. Bitbar provides a cloud-based model, simplifying setup, with a focus on global accessibility and responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional typically incurs lower costs for Microsoft ecosystem users, offering good ROI through integration efficiencies. Bitbar may have higher initial costs but delivers greater ROI for projects needing varied device testing.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbar vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bitbar vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbar

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

28th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Platforms (10th)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Bitbar is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional	1.2%
Bitbar	1.3%
Other	97.5%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1288116

Head of Digital & Cognitive Services at a tech company with 11-50 employees

A testing platform with a good API for apps, but pricing is complicated

I like that the AI Testbot is a near-zero code application for testing. For this use case, the function is good. The services are robust. Game testing and the API for apps are also good. From the perspective of pricing, licensing, ease of use, integration with other applications, impact complexity, and integration with other tools, we're pretty much very satisfied.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Game testing and the API for apps are good."

"Ability to use different frameworks."

"It is a good and user-friendly tool."

"Searching is extensive and helpful."

"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."

"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."

"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."

"The initial setup is easy. It's easy to configure."

"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."

"One of the best documentation in the world."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."

"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."

"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."

"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."

"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."

"The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit."

"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."

"Sometimes, the solution hangs, so its performance could be improved."

"The price could be improved."

"The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."

"We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."

"I positioned it at a mid-range level. It isn't an inexpensive solution, but considering its capabilities, it represents excellent value for the functionalities it offers."

"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional, which is expensive."

"The product is very expensive."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very expensive solution."

"The tool is expensive in my region."

"The pricing is expensive."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

15%

Performing Arts

13%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?

The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs Bitbar

Compared 18% of the time

BrowserStack vs Bitbar

Compared 17% of the time

LambdaTest vs Bitbar

Compared 13% of the time

IBM MobileFirst vs Bitbar

Compared 10% of the time

Perfecto vs Bitbar

Compared 10% of the time

More Bitbar Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Platforms

January 2026

Download Bitbar product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

January 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Also Known As

Testdroid

No data available

Overview

Testdroid is a set of mobile software development and testing products by Bitbar Technologies Limited. Testdroid comprises three different products: Testdroid Cloud, Testdroid Recorder and Testdroid Enterprise. Testdroid provides an application programming interface through open source software available on GitHub. Testdroid can use testing frameworks, such as Robotium, Appium and uiautomator for native and Selenium for web applications, targeted for mobile application and game developers. Testdroid Cloud contains real Android and iOS powered devices, some of which are available for users. Testdroid Cloud lets users run tests simultaneously on cloud-based service. Testdroid Recorder is a tool for developers and testers for recording user-actions and producing JUnit based test cases on mobile application and games. Testdroid Recorder is available at the Eclipse marketplace. Testdroid Enterprise is a server software for managing automated testing on multiple real Android and iOS powered devices, supporting Gradle build system and Jenkins Continuous Integration.

SmartBear

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, Subway

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

Bitbar vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

January 2026

Free Report: Bitbar vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbar vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitbar vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.