We performed a comparison between Bitbar and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"Ability to use different frameworks."
"The initial setup is easy. It's easy to configure."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"The debugging feature is valuable."
"One of the best documentation in the world."
"The interface is easy to use."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."
"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Bitbar is ranked 26th in Functional Testing Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, SmartBear TestComplete, CrossBrowserTesting, Sauce Labs and LambdaTest, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.