OpenText Silk Test and Bitbar are competing products in the test automation tools category. Bitbar holds an advantage with its extensive mobile testing features despite being more expensive, as users find the cost worthwhile due to its capabilities.
Features: OpenText Silk Test offers advanced scripting, test management capabilities, and cross-browser testing. Bitbar features a cloud-based mobile testing platform with vast device coverage and parallel testing options. The advanced mobile testing capabilities of Bitbar, supporting a variety of devices and platforms, are a significant advantage.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test provides a straightforward deployment process and dependable customer support, facilitating quick integration into current systems. Bitbar, while complex due to its cloud infrastructure, may experience longer deployment times but benefits from responsive online support. For users prioritizing advanced mobile testing, Bitbar's deployment is more appropriate.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test is more affordable initially, appealing to budget-conscious businesses, and offers significant ROI through its test management features. Bitbar requires a higher initial investment due to its cloud setup but promises substantial ROI with its comprehensive testing options and device coverage, making the higher cost justified for extensive mobile testing needs.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Silk Test | 1.5% |
| Bitbar | 1.3% |
| Other | 97.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
