BigQuery vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Google Logo
3,645 views|2,685 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
564 views|446 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BigQuery and Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed BigQuery vs. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The query tool is scalable and allows for petabytes of data.""What I like most about BigQuery is that it's fast and flexible. Another advantage of BigQuery is that it's easy to learn.""The feature called calibrating the capacity is valuable.""The most valuable features of BigQuery is that it supports standard SQL and provides good performance.""The initial setup process is easy.""As a cloud solution, it's easy to set up.""The integrated data storage features are good.""BigQuery can be used for any type of company. It has the capability of building applications and storing data. It can be used for OLTP or OLAP. It has many other products within the Google space."

More BigQuery Pros →

"The data transmissions between the data models is the most valuable feature.""Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse integrates beautifully with other Microsoft ecosystem products.""Data collection and reporting are valuable features of the solution.""​It has allowed fast daily loads and analysis of millions of rows of data, which eventually moved to near real-time.​""Tools like the BI and SAS are excellent.""One of the most important features is the ease of using MS SQL.""The solution has been reliable.""The UI is very simple and functional for my clients, most of the clients that use the solution are not experts."

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pros →

Cons
"They could enhance the platform's user accessibility.""With other columnar databases like Snowflake, you can actually increase your VM size or increase your machine size, and you can buy more memory and it will start working faster, but that's not available in BigQuery. You have to actually open a ticket and then follow it up with Google support.""The processing capability can be an area of improvement.""There are many tools that you have to use with BigQuery that are different services also provided for by Google. They need to all be integrated into BigQuery to make the solution easier to use.""The initial setup could be improved making it easier to deploy.""I rate BigQuery six out of 10 for affordability. It could be cheaper.""We'd like to have more integrations with other technologies.""There is a good amount of documentation out there, but they're consistently making changes to the platform, and, like, their literature hasn't been updated on some plans."

More BigQuery Cons →

"In the future I would love to see a slightly better automation engine, just for the data integration layer, to make it slightly easier for end-users or junior developers to get involved in incremental updating.""We find the cost of the solution to be a little high.""​Concurrent queries are limited to 32, making it more of a data storage mechanism instead of an active DWH solution.""Some compatibility issues occur during deployment, so we need to build the product from scratch for some features.""The product must provide more frequent updates.""SQL installation is pretty tricky. The scalability and customer support also should be improved.""The product does not have all of the features that the native products have.""The solution is expensive and has room for improvement."

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I have tried my own setup using my Gmail ID, and I think it had a $300 limit for free for a new user. That's what Google is offering, and we can register and create a project."
  • "BigQuery is inexpensive."
  • "One terabyte of data costs $20 to $22 per month for storage on BigQuery and $25 on Snowflake. Snowflake is costlier for one terabyte, but BigQuery charges based on how much data is inserted into the tables. BigQuery charges you based on the amount of data that you handle and not the time in which you handle it. This is why the pricing models are different and it becomes a key consideration in the decision of which platform to use."
  • "The price is a bit high but the technology is worth it."
  • "The price could be better. Usually, you need to buy the license for a year. Whenever you want more, you can subscribe to it, and you can use it. Otherwise, you can terminate the license. You can use it daily or monthly, and we use it based on a project's requirements."
  • "The solution is pretty affordable and quite cheap in comparison to PDP or Cloudera."
  • "BigQuery pricing can increase quickly. It's a high-priced solution."
  • "The pricing is good and there are no additional costs involved."
  • More BigQuery Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think the program is well-priced compared to the other offerings that are out in the market."
  • "Microsoft has an agreement with the government in our country, so our customers get their licensing costs from the Ministry. Whenever we work with any government, company, or government institute, which is mainly what we are doing, that license comes directly from the Ministry of Technology and Information."
  • "All the features that we use do not require any additional subscription or yearly fees."
  • "Technical support is an additional fee and is expensive."
  • "The solution's pricing is fairly decent for organizations with huge data sizes."
  • "The tool could be expensive if we need to manage a lot of data."
  • "They offer an annual subscription. The pricing depends on the size of the environments."
  • More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The initial setup process is easy.
    Top Answer:They could enhance the platform's user accessibility. Currently, the structure of BigQuery leans more towards catering to hard-code developers, making it less user-friendly for data analysts or… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides good firewall processing in terms of response time.
    Top Answer:They offer an annual subscription. The pricing depends on the size of the environments.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, the product requires rolling back to its previous version during a software update. This particular area could be enhanced.
    Ranking
    5th
    Views
    3,645
    Comparisons
    2,685
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    502
    Rating
    8.1
    8th
    out of 35 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    564
    Comparisons
    446
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    379
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft PDW, SQL Server Data Warehouse, Microsoft SQL Server Parallel Data Warehouse, MS Parallel Data Warehouse
    Learn More
    Overview

    BigQuery is an enterprise data warehouse that solves this problem by enabling super-fast SQL queries using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. ... You can control access to both the project and your data based on your business needs, such as giving others the ability to view or query your data.

    The traditional structured relational data warehouse was never designed to handle the volume of exponential data growth, the variety of semi-structured and unstructured data types, or the velocity of real time data processing. Microsoft's SQL Server data warehouse solution integrates your traditional data warehouse with non-relational data and it can handle data of all sizes and types, with real-time performance.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Auckland Transport, Erste Bank Group, Urban Software Institute, NJVC, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Media Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Retailer7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Healthcare Company18%
    Hospitality Company12%
    Pharma/Biotech Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Insurance Company7%
    University6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    BigQuery vs. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BigQuery vs. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BigQuery is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Warehouse with 31 reviews while Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is ranked 8th in Data Warehouse with 32 reviews. BigQuery is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of BigQuery writes "Expandable and easy to set up but needs more local data residency". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse writes "An easy to setup tool that allows its users to write stored procedure, making it a scalable product". BigQuery is most compared with Snowflake, Teradata, Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, Vertica and Apache Hadoop, whereas Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, SAP BW4HANA, Snowflake and VMware Tanzu Greenplum. See our BigQuery vs. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse report.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.