No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Barracuda Application Protection vs Salt Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Application Prote...
Ranking in API Security
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Salt Security
Ranking in API Security
6th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AI Security (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Barracuda Application Protection is 2.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Salt Security is 6.8%, down from 12.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Salt Security6.8%
Barracuda Application Protection2.1%
Other91.1%
API Security
 

Featured Reviews

Salbu Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at Cyvogenix
Application protection has strengthened web security and reduces manual effort for critical services
One area where Barracuda Application Protection could be improved is reporting customization. The dashboards are useful, but more flexible executive-level and technical reporting options would help different teams. Another area is policy tuning for complex applications. While the platform is strong overall, some advanced environments need extra fine-tuning to reduce false positives or adapt custom rules. Deeper integrations with third-party CM and DevSecOps workflows would streamline operations further. Overall, it is a solid platform, but more customization and smoother advanced tuning would make it even better. A simpler onboarding experience for new administrators would be beneficial. The platform has many strong features, but teams without deep WAF experience may need time to become fully comfortable with advanced settings. More AI-driven recommendations for rule tuning, anomaly prioritization, and false positive reduction would help smaller teams operate more efficiently. Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses. Overall, the product is strong, but easier management and smarter automation would make it even more attractive.
TV
Sr Investigation Specialist at Ifood
Improved API visibility has revealed sensitive data exposures and supports faster remediation
Alert tuning can require some time depending on API volume. Some findings need internal validation before actioning. The collaboration flows between security and engineering teams could be expanded further. While the solution was straightforward to set up and gave me the visibility that I needed, it has to improve some details and features to achieve a perfect rating.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization by managing traffic well, enhancing access security, operational efficiency, and user experience, leading to customer satisfaction."
"Barracuda Application Protection has significantly improved security posture, reducing the attack surface using WAF plus API protection, automating threats with machine learning-based bot protections, providing zero-trust access to applications, and helping detect and mitigate threats in real-time, resulting in a 50 to 60% reduction in security incidents after deployment."
"Within the first six to seven months of deployment, I saw a 60% reduction in security incidents, incidents affecting the web application which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response."
"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization by reducing the noise, saving our websites and applications because it sits in front of them, which has been very beneficial, as I measured that impact by noticing fewer incidents, fewer downtimes, and better SLAs."
"Barracuda Application Protection has been a solid and dependable solution for protecting public-facing applications."
"Barracuda Application Protection's best features are protecting APIs and defending against zero-day vulnerabilities."
"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization as it is used for multiple clients, and I am also backing up the Exchange servers, which frequently experience attacks in customer environments, allowing for quick restoration, even from yesterday or the day before yesterday."
"Within the first six months of deployment, we have seen a 60% reduction in security incidents affecting the web application, which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response."
"Salt Security gives you visibility of all your APIs, identifies API security issues, and immediately alerts you of attacks."
"Salt Security gave me much better visibility into API risk, helping me identify exposed endpoints, misconfigured APIs, and sensitive data flowing through APIs that required additional controls, and it has become an important part of my API security program."
"It's really great. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I haven't encountered any instability issues."
 

Cons

"Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses."
"One area where Barracuda Application Protection can improve is in policy tuning and ease of configuration, especially for complex application and API-heavy environments."
"The interface of Barracuda Application Protection is generally intuitive but can become complex for advanced configurations."
"I do not have much to say about the improvement, but a more innovative solution for sniffing more on the network would be great, and having the advanced ability to close off ports when they could be getting tested from hackers for intrusion would be helpful."
"The reporting functionality is quite poor in its current state."
"My only concerns are that it is not very user-friendly and the response time is slow."
"Barracuda Application Protection could be improved with a more user-friendly interface to enable all types of people to be able to use it, especially the less technical users."
"Improving the operating system structure, firmware, and overall performance would enhance loading times for devices."
"The integration part could be a bit extended."
"The setup cost was acceptable, but adding additional APIs was actually quite expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.
900,125 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Transportation Company
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise25
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Application Protection?
The experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Barracuda Application Protection is positive, though there is room for improvement.
What needs improvement with Barracuda Application Protection?
When it comes to reporting and analytics by Barracuda Application Protection, I find it adequate, but the reporting is very data-based and requires you to import it into Power BI to generate your o...
What is your primary use case for Barracuda Application Protection?
Barracuda Application Protection is used to protect applications from SQL injection, API abuse, and bot attacks. It solves problems related to DDoS attacks, data leakage, and zero-day threats on a ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Salt Security?
The setup cost was acceptable, but adding additional APIs was actually quite expensive.
What needs improvement with Salt Security?
Alert tuning can require some time depending on API volume. Some findings need internal validation before actioning. The collaboration flows between security and engineering teams could be expanded...
What is your primary use case for Salt Security?
I use Salt Security primarily for API discovery, mainly regarding data-sensitive information across the company. Before using Salt Security for API discovery and sensitive information, I didn't hav...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Salt Security API Protection Platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Appsflyer, Armis, City National Bank, Coralogix, Finastra, Gett, Honeybook, Payoneer
Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva, Akamai, Orca Security and others in API Security. Updated: May 2026.
900,125 professionals have used our research since 2012.