We performed a comparison between Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 and NAKIVO Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Veeam Software, N-able and others in SaaS Backup."Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is easy to use."
"The stability has always been very good."
"The solution has good scalability."
"The most valuable feature includes leaving the stub files behind and integrating that with the recenter feature."
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Pros →
"You can have it setup and running within a few minutes."
"Nakivo gives users confidence in knowing that if something happens with their application server, exchange server, or other applications, they can recover it easily and quickly."
"The product is very scalable, robust, has an easy setup with a short-duration deployment and good technical support."
"Nakivo is an easy-to-use, robust and cost-effective backup solution. I highly recommend it."
"The ability to create a replica of all virtual machines is a great feature."
"Cloud integration is valuable because the ability to not only backup locally, but to the cloud, has been a great addition to the already fantastic product."
"The ability to restore in a catastrophic event is priceless, since every company must use a backup solution of some sort."
"This solution was surprisingly easy to configure."
"I think the solution itself keeps up with everything else. Sometimes it would be nice if they could move a little bit quicker and have faster updates, but in terms of the features, it's absolutely fine and adequate."
"The solution's updates and rollouts of the patches cause a lot of problems."
"We need more options for the backup schedule."
"The user experience needs a little refreshing touch."
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Cons →
"Integrations maybe helpful for NAKIVO. I think end-to-end backup and user backup will be useful to have. The price could be reduced as well. I also think that AD integration should be more available."
"An additional feature that would be appreciated is disaster recovery automation."
"It would be good if I could have a remote upgrade of our Synology Transporters, but the manual upgrade is easy and no problem at all."
"It would be good to have some Oracle database backup capability from the Linux OS in the next release."
"They need to add a failover feature to the Essential Pro license in case the environment is a simple virtual environment and the client does not need to upgrade."
"I would like to see support for backing up from other platforms, such as physical machines."
"Space is always an issue."
"In the future, it would be nice to have support for Zimbra email, Collabora Office, and the NextCloud content collaboration platform."
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is ranked 14th in SaaS Backup with 4 reviews while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is ranked 6th in Backup and Recovery with 84 reviews. Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is rated 8.2, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 writes "Allows for storage optimization and archiving functionality of DocAve Backup is valuable for organizations with large amounts of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NAKIVO Backup & Replication writes "Good deduplication, easy to configure, and offers a free version". Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is most compared with Code42 Incydr and IBM Spectrum Protect Plus, whereas NAKIVO Backup & Replication is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and Zerto.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
