Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs IBM Public Cloud comparison

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #18 with an average rating of 6.5. Microsoft holds a 1.2% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Read 11 Azure Red Hat OpenShift reviews

1,275 Views
1,186 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Public Cloud

Read 18 IBM Public Cloud reviews

4,280 Views
3,510 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

IBM Public Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

IBM Public Cloud and Azure Red Hat OpenShift are competing products in the cloud services arena. Azure Red Hat OpenShift appears to have the upper hand due to its feature richness and perceived value.

Features: IBM Public Cloud offers strong data encryption, a comprehensive global infrastructure, and personalization support, ensuring high reliability and compliance. Azure Red Hat OpenShift features a user-friendly GUI, NAT-based networking solutions, and automated scaling capabilities, enhancing development efficiency and integration with Azure services.

Room for Improvement: IBM Public Cloud could enhance integration features and ease of use in complex scenarios while offering more cost-effective solutions for larger infrastructures. It could also expand its feature set beyond security. Azure Red Hat OpenShift could benefit from a reduction in licensing costs and further simplification of some administrative processes. Additionally, improving out-of-box network configuration and security policies would be valuable.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Public Cloud provides a flexible deployment model that supports hybrid environments, coupled with direct and personalized customer service. Azure Red Hat OpenShift offers swift deployment via Kubernetes management, benefiting from Microsoft's extensive support network, ensuring efficient application scaling and resilience.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Public Cloud offers competitive long-term pricing, making it economically viable despite higher initial costs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift might incur higher upfront setup expenses but delivers a superior ROI through advanced development tools and quicker productivity boosts.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Public Cloud Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Public Cloud

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Public Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IoT Platforms (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Azure Red Hat OpenShift is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Public Cloud is 3.6%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Red Hat OpenShift	1.2%
IBM Public Cloud	3.6%
Other	95.2%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

DeepakMishra

CEO, Head of Sales and Business Development at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Integrated cloud platform has streamlined app delivery and supported certified marketplace products

A potential area for improvement for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is to see managed identity support and ensure that some of the security features are not conflicting with Azure or Azure product features. I am sure in the future it will be more templatized so that we need not depend on Azure security features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift should be independent of Azure security features with respect to container scan and all that. Why would it use an Azure security feature? That is what I find. It is still yet to be GA and commonly available, but that is a strong reason for improvement.

Read full review

Premnath Jaganathan

Product Manager at Uop Ipl

Affordability and security improve our cloud experience while learning new systems

I'm not working with any AI features in IBM Public Cloud, but they are in the process of building it.I am very satisfied with the security that IBM Public Cloud provides. I would rate IBM Public Cloud eight out of ten, where one is worst and ten is the best.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."

"Flexibility, a very well-developed interface, and ease of learning are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"The functions and features in Azure Red Hat OpenShift that I have found most valuable are that it is a platform that is baked into Azure, and since it is baked into Azure, it is managed operation by Azure, which takes out the complexity of the infrastructure management and day two operations when compared with on-premise OpenShift."

"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."

"Technical support from Red Hat is very good."

"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"Red Hat is a very stable product with good integration with products such as Kubernetes, and it also offers migration tools."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

"I am very much satisfied with the technical support team at IBM Public Cloud."

"This is a predictable and dependable service."

"On the production side, we are seeing a 200% ROI."

"The price of IBM Cloud is most valuable for us."

"One of the features that I really like about IBM Cloud is the flexibility where you can order your own hardware."

"The platform has everything that I need - or 99% of the requirements we need."

"It is a scalable product. You can scale it up and down."

"The stability is excellent; it's 200% stable with no bugs or glitches, it doesn't crash or freeze, and it's extremely reliable with great performance."

More IBM Public Cloud pros

Cons

"They need to improve the core licensing model."

"Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is the leader in this area. However, there's no need for service improvement in Azure Red Hat OpenShift as the service is excellent. I don't need additional features because I can customize it according to the customer's needs."

"I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretation."

"The product is expensive."

"Automation could be improved."

"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."

"Technically, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is fine. However, its marketing could be improved, especially when compared to the robust marketing efforts of Azure, HPE, and Nutanix."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

"An improvement that I would like to see is better configuration capability."

"This solution can be very slow, which was a big problem for us."

"The connectivity and speed of IBM Public Cloud are much lower compared to the competition."

"The product should offer more computing, similar to Amazon."

"Support needs some improvement. Basically, you are doing it all on your own, and it's not easy."

"Recently, we just faced some issues with the operating system due to the end of life of CentOS 6...So, then the client wanted to try it out under AWS instead of IBM. In short, it has some complexities."

"While they have about 99% of what we need, the only exception, perhaps, was the push notification feature that was discontinued. They delayed the replacement product."

"The initial setup and the pricing are areas that need improvement."

More IBM Public Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"IBM Public Cloud is pretty cheap. They have an ongoing free tier that basically won't expire, so as long as your solution is small enough, you can have a test set that you can use for demos, which will cost you almost nothing."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten."

"We are using the trial version of this solution, so we have not paid anything."

"The licensing fees are straightforward and predictable."

"In order to be competitive, you have to commit to a contract for at least one year, but you pay a fixed monthly fee."

"It pretty much has a standard price. There is no hidden price with IBM Public Cloud."

"The price of IBM Cloud is very cheap compared to competitors AWS and Azure."

"Pricing is not as fair as Amazon or Azure."

More IBM Public Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

11%

University

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The pricing for OpenShift is similar to other solutions like Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) Studio. The plans with ARO and AWS are standard in the market. However, using OpenShift on-pre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

My use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is for an employee engagement application and HR, and I have also used it for an agentic bot.

See all answers

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Public Cloud?

The prices are relatively lower compared to others. It is a good option for medium-sized businesses. However, businesses should also consider other vendors to ensure they meet their specific securi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Public Cloud?

The connectivity and speed of IBM Public Cloud are much lower compared to the competition.

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 18% of the time

Google Cloud vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 10% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Amazon AWS vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 21% of the time

Google Cloud vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Dell ObjectScale vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Public Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

August 2026

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Public Cloud

August 2026

Download IBM Public Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Bluemix

Overview

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides enterprises with enhanced cloud-native flexibility and supports efficient multi-cloud migrations, simplifying infrastructure management, security, and patching.

Enterprises find Azure Red Hat OpenShift valuable for its advanced GUI, service mesh, automatic scaling, and integration capabilities. It aids regulatory compliance and streamlines application development with its DevOps integration, reducing release cycle times. The platform is appreciated for scalability, accessibility, and resilience. Users highlight its straightforward configuration, though improvements in the licensing model, cost-effectiveness, CLI, and support for data-intensive applications are needed. Orchestration, compatibility with new frameworks, and Azure dependency are areas for refinement. Built-in CI/CD tools are preferred over third-party solutions.

What are the key features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

Advanced GUI: Intuitive interface for streamlined management.
Service Mesh: Simplifies microservices management.
Automatic Scaling: Efficiently manages resources to meet demand.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with enterprise systems.
DevOps: Reduces release cycle time with unique integration.

Why consider Azure Red Hat OpenShift for your enterprise?

Cloud-Native Flexibility: Enhances adaptability for applications.
Security and Compliance: Aids in regulatory adherence.
Infrastructure Management: Simplifies with automation.
Scalability and Resilience: Handles workloads efficiently.

Businesses deploy Azure Red Hat OpenShift for pipeline management, containerized applications, and cloud migration. It supports banking operations, corporate integrations, and digital business development. Enterprises use it for Apache deployment in cloud platforms, advised by consultants transitioning from Broadcom to OpenShift.

Microsoft

IBM Public Cloud combines reliability, scalability, and security, offering dedicated hosting with flexible hardware and network configurations. AI integrations and workload management make it a valuable asset for tech environments, ensuring excellent performance with 24/7 customer support.

IBM Public Cloud is noted for its robust offerings, including bare metal servers and strong security measures, appealing to businesses seeking dedicated hosting and server management solutions. Though cost-effective and user-friendly, there are areas for improvement in computing power and deployment processes. The lack of restrictions on data transfers in serverless functions sets it apart from competitors. Users have highlighted issues with configuration complexity and the need for better documentation. While the Cloud Foundry deprecation posed challenges, industries continue to employ IBM Public Cloud for hosting, SaaS infrastructure, and digital laboratories, thanks to its flexibility and resource-intensive data management capabilities.

What are the key features of IBM Public Cloud?

Scalability: Offers flexible hardware ordering and network design.
Security: Enhances protection for sensitive data handling.
Performance: High availability and workload management.
AI Integrations: Supports modern AI-driven solutions.
24/7 Support: Responsive customer assistance.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from IBM Public Cloud?

Cost Efficiency: Provides competitive pricing for services.
Data Transfer: Allows unrestricted serverless function transfers.
Flexibility: Adapts to hosting and SaaS infrastructure needs.
Resource Handling: Optimal for data processing and network tasks.

IBM Public Cloud finds widespread application across industries such as telecommunications, education, and analytics. Organizations utilize it for developing SaaS infrastructure, dedicated server hosting, teaching agreements, and microservices. It plays a crucial role in sensitive data management, disaster recovery, and supporting hybrid architectures.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Uvionics Tech, Komsomolskaya Pravda, Alpha Modus, Inventive, Web Business Consulting, FindBrok, SilverHook Powerboats, United Way of Allegheny County

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Public Cloud

August 2026

Free Report: Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Public Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Public Cloud and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Public Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.