We performed a comparison between Azure Cost Management and BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, VMware and others in Cloud Cost Management."Microsoft Azure Cloud Cost Management is easy to use and we have a lot of insights about all of our goals."
"The interface is good, and it's easy to manage."
"It encompasses a multitude of specialized services, each with its associated costs and considerations."
"The best thing about Azure Cost Management is the cost analysis functionality because it provides regular alerts."
"I like the granularity of the tools."
"It is easy to log in, and everything is graphical so that you can build on the published resources."
"It is a fully scalable product with the potential to enhance our application and increase our servers. All cloud-based solutions are fully scalable."
"The tool is very stable."
"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."
"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."
"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."
"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."
"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."
"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."
"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."
"I haven't detected anything that needs improvement, but any solution could be improved."
"The solution needs an automated dashboard and better reporting."
"The solution could improve its APIs to access the customer application."
"The forecasting model can improve Azure Cost Management."
"The solution could use automatic emailing. That would help improve the product a lot, at least for our purposes."
"The affordability of licenses and subscription fees is a critical consideration, as not all companies can easily manage the cost of expensive licenses."
"Optimization and scalability could be increased."
"It would be nice if they could introduce connections to other clouds. It would be good to connect to AWS and Oracle cloud."
"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."
"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."
"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."
Earn 20 points
Azure Cost Management is ranked 2nd in Cloud Cost Management with 41 reviews while BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is ranked 43rd in Cloud Management. Azure Cost Management is rated 8.0, while BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "A good, but limited cost information solution with strong analytics but requiring more flexibility in its reporting functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management writes "Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system". Azure Cost Management is most compared with IBM Turbonomic, VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, AWS Savings Plans, Cloudability and Zabbix, whereas BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is most compared with CloudBolt.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
