AWS Step Functions vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.9, while OpenText is ranked #38. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Step Functions

Read 14 AWS Step Functions reviews

2,556 Views
1,891 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

OpenText MBPM

Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews

606 Views
558 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Step Functions

OpenText MBPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText MBPM and AWS Step Functions compete in the business process management and cloud orchestration categories. AWS Step Functions tends to have the upper hand due to its scalability and integration capabilities that many find justify its pricing.

Features: OpenText MBPM provides robust process automation tools, management flexibility, and comprehensive monitoring capabilities. AWS Step Functions offers seamless orchestration of microservices, simplifies complex workflows, and integrates efficiently with other AWS services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText MBPM requires a structured deployment process that can be resource-intensive and emphasizes direct customer support. AWS Step Functions offers quick setup with a cloud-native deployment model and benefits from comprehensive resources for customer support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText MBPM involves higher upfront costs with its enterprise-oriented model, providing significant long-term ROI in streamlined operations. AWS Step Functions features lower initial setup costs through pay-as-you-go pricing, making it cost-effective as usage grows. Organizations often find its ROI attractive for serverless computing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText MBPM

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Step Functions

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (10th)

OpenText MBPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

38th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AWS Step Functions is 1.7%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText MBPM is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Step Functions	1.7%
OpenText MBPM	0.9%
Other	97.4%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2706945

Assistant Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Orchestration and integration simplify processes with seamless stability and reliability

I use the Visual Workflow Editor feature of AWS Step Functions. I mainly work through code and then improve it through the visual aspect. There are two ways to do orchestration: through code and through visual. My main task is to develop flows. I have only implemented AWS Step Functions with AWS services, not with any third-party tools. The integration between AWS Step Functions and other AWS services is excellent, working seamlessly with EventBridge, Glue jobs, and databases. I have not encountered any challenges with customers regarding AWS Step Functions that needed me to find a workaround. The pricing of AWS Step Functions is moderate and not particularly costly. AWS Step Functions is affordable for small, medium, and enterprise businesses as an orchestration tool. I have not used any documentation, manuals, or guides for AWS Step Functions as it's very simple to implement. When help is needed, I consult Stack Overflow or AI for commands. Overall rating for AWS Step Functions: 9 out of 10.

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation

I think the solution's support could do a better job. I rate the support somewhere around four and five out of ten. There is a hoard of people that they get in touch with while contacting them. So we've done some work with them in the past. I mean, we've been a support partner for a while. But apart from that, in terms of understanding the issues for a particular technology, I think there is a lack of people at their end. So they don't really have many people with them. And by the time we could get hold of the right person, especially for production issues, it's a little too late.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a general solution that you can adapt to your own needs and is simple to use. We like that it can be integrated with everything in the AWS suite, and that the creation of the pipeline can be done using the graphical user interface."

"The solution is stable...The solution is easy to scale."

"If you want to create a workflow to call one Lambda function after another, and other serverless features, it could save you a ton of money. That's for sure."

"AWS Step Functions offers advanced workflows that save time and enhance efficiency by reducing delays and ensuring consistent orchestration among various services."

"The number of historical events is great."

"It's Amazon, it's scalable."

"One can rate all the calls and that is a good feature."

"It is a scalable solution."

More AWS Step Functions pros

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

Cons

"The interface can sometimes feel limited, as we're unable to see what AWS is running behind the scenes."

"It is hard to coordinate the declaratory language."

"If AWS Step Functions keeps adding more integrations, it would be even better."

"The solution's pricing could be cheaper. It is cheaper than Airflow."

"I would like to see more data transformation features in Amazon Step Functions like additional operators and logic."

"One area for improvement is the payload size. Currently, I sometimes have to save data as a file since I cannot pass it within Step Functions, necessitating caching in processes."

"There is room for improvement in terms of integration with other products. It would benefit from more integration with different applications or services."

"The pricing of the solution can be improved."

More AWS Step Functions cons

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."

"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The solution is expensive."

"There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Step Functions?

The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Step Functions?

My customer's usual use cases for AWS Step Functions that I've been working with include orchestration, flows, diagram creation, and creating a flow for multiple Glue jobs to run a single pipeline.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Step Functions?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 29% of the time

Control-M vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 12% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Airflow vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Step Functions Competitors

IBM BPM vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 21% of the time

IBM Case Foundation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 20% of the time

Apache Airflow vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 20% of the time

Appian vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Process Automation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 14% of the time

More OpenText MBPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions

January 2026

Download AWS Step Functions product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download OpenText MBPM product report

Also Known As

Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions

Metastorm BPM

Overview

AWS Step Functions integrate seamlessly with other AWS services to offer efficient pipeline and workflow management. Its intuitive design allows for streamlined orchestration, easily handling complex tasks.

AWS Step Functions provide robust orchestration and automation capabilities, simplifying the creation of workflows with graphical and JSON-based designs. It excels in managing tasks through advanced parallelization and error handling features. Automatic scaling further enhances performance, ensuring reliability in varied environments. However, improvements are needed in IDE integration, larger data handling, and fault tolerance. Users find value in its capacity for microservice orchestration and data integration, although dependency on the Amazon ecosystem and limited third-party integrations pose challenges.

What are the key features of AWS Step Functions?

Integration with AWS Services: Facilitates seamless coordination with AWS offerings like Lambda and Glue.
Graphical and JSON-Based Design: User-friendly interfaces simplify workflow design and management.
Advanced Orchestration: Efficiently manages task execution with parallelization and error handling.
Automatic Scaling: Ensures optimal performance by adjusting resources as needed.
Microservice Integration: Supports smooth microservice communication and operation.

What benefits should organizations assess when considering AWS Step Functions?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates and streamlines task execution across platforms.
Scalability: Adapts to workloads, providing flexibility in resource management.
Improved Workflow Management: Facilitates reliable and error-free operations.
Visualization and Automation: Simplifies complex processes with visual tools.
Data Validation and Script Execution: Integrates data operations smoothly within data lakes.

In industries managing data pipelines, AWS Step Functions orchestrate workflows, execute parallel ETL jobs, and integrate various AWS services, enabling smoother operations and efficient data migration. Companies benefit from streamlined processes and robust handling of interdependent tasks.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite

Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText MBPM

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText MBPM

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText MBPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.