AWS Snowball vs Azure NetApp Files comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8, while NetApp is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.2. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.5% mindshare in CM, compared to NetApp’s 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

AWS Snowball

Read 10 AWS Snowball reviews

2,489 Views
100 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Azure NetApp Files

Read 17 Azure NetApp Files reviews

2,313 Views
763 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AWS Snowball

Azure NetApp Files

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

AWS Snowball and Azure NetApp Files compete in cloud data transfer and storage solutions. AWS Snowball is renowned for ease of use and swift customer service, while Azure NetApp Files is preferred for its expansive features and integration within the Azure ecosystem.

Features: AWS Snowball offers secure offline data transfer, end-to-end encryption, and edge computing support. Azure NetApp Files provides high-speed SQL backup, seamless Azure integration, and ultra-fast provisioning. Both products cater to different user priorities, with AWS focusing on offline capabilities and Azure on high-performance cloud integration.

Room for Improvement: AWS Snowball could enhance its software features, improve cloud integration, and diversify protocol support. Azure NetApp Files may improve its pricing transparency, reduce complexity in deployment, and expand support for hybrid clouds. Each product has unique opportunities to refine user experiences and broaden functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Snowball is known for its straightforward hardware deployment and robust customer support. Azure NetApp Files offers flexible, cloud-based deployment with strong service support within Azure. While AWS shines with standalone implementation ease, Azure's strength lies in seamless Azure ecosystem integration.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Snowball presents a simple pricing model due to its physical nature, offering quick ROI through efficient data migrations. Azure NetApp Files, though complex in cost structure, promises higher ROI with extensive features and integration capabilities within Azure. AWS focuses on cost-effectiveness in data transfer, while Azure emphasizes the value of integrated cloud services.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Snowball vs. Azure NetApp Files Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Snowball vs. Azure NetApp Files

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Snowball

Ranking in Cloud Migration

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Migration Appliances (1st)

Azure NetApp Files

Ranking in Cloud Migration

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (12th), Public Cloud Storage Services (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of AWS Snowball is 1.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure NetApp Files is 7.4%, down from 14.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure NetApp Files	7.4%
AWS Snowball	1.5%
Other	91.1%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Kevin-Davis

Global CTO AWS Business Group at Eviden

Seamless data transfer and efficient migration with customizable storage sizes

I like that I can take data and send it straight to S3 when it loads in. The interface for getting my data onto the Snowball is so streamlined. I don't know if you've ever seen it before. It's really cool. I connect them to the backplane of our existing network. I'm able to address it quickly and move the data quickly inside my customers' data centers. There's a little screen on it, which changes the UPS codes and all that stuff. The label and everything AWS electronic, so I don't have to deal with shipping issues. It makes it super simple and easy to use from end to end.

Read full review

AjayKumar13

Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Fast, reliable, and helps meet our SLAs

The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes. It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable. You don't need to take the snapshot. Snapshots are compressed. It doesn't take storage from the back end. It takes three minutes to do sixty terabytes of the database. You don't have to go to the tape and store it outside, which takes hours and hours. It also uses a lot less of the storage. It's very easy to restore or copy the snapshots to other locations for disaster recovery. There are a lot of benefits. In terms of the snapshot's rapid restore capability, we were testing the load of performance testing, and we needed to rebuild the DR site. If I need to rebuild the DR for a standby database, it takes sixty terabytes to copy onto the another site, which will take at least a day. Now, the snapshot is easy. We just copy the snapshots, and then we do the cross-region application. The snapshots came along with that, and that's where we were able to build the DR site within a few hours rather than days. All together, instead of a four-day process, instead of a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is elastic."

"AWS helps save time and costs, being a managed cloud provider with evolving services."

"The flexibility of AWS Snowball is valuable. Its security allows for the ability to move and secure data without concern if the device is lost and the option to trace it back to AWS data centers."

"The solution is elastic."

"You are able to scale the solution vertically. It's very scalable."

"I like that I can take data and send it straight to S3 when it loads in."

"The support team's awesome, and they've always been very responsive."

"The way the data is moved is very clever. Also, the interface is very simple and user-friendly."

More AWS Snowball pros

"I think the easiest part is, when you do a comparison, it is the throughput versus the cost. And it's much easier to set up."

"Since we have NetApp's internally, we use the SnapMirror predominantly for this process in the cloud which is beneficial."

"Using NetApp Files got us out of a really difficult situation quickly, effectively, and at a reasonable cost."

"The most valuable features of the solution is replication to another region and the performance. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward."

"It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable."

"It's elastic, so it scales with our demands. We can start small, then with the addition of customer loads, we can expand on-the-fly without the need to reprovision something."

"You can change it non-disruptively. You can increase the size and decrease the size online, which is a huge benefit compared to Azure disks. It just works seamlessly. You don't need to stop the instances."

"We use Azure NetApp Files mainly for backup."

More Azure NetApp Files pros

Cons

"There's always room for improvement as you use the service more and gain expertise. Some challenges I've faced include the time factor (data transfer can be time-consuming), data validation after the transfer, risks associated with physical handling and shipping of the device, and ensuring data security during transit."

"I think AWS Snowball could improve by expanding its availability to more countries."

"24/7 support is more expensive on AWS compared to Azure."

"Snowball is not interesting and is a pain to deal with."

"If AWS Snowball is intercepted, there is a potential risk of unauthorized access to the data."

"The stability of the solution isn't ideal and should be improved."

"It's not cheap."

"AWS support could be more responsive."

More AWS Snowball cons

"The main hurdle in promoting this solution is the price. Its price definitely requires an improvement. It is more expensive than other options, so customers go for a cheaper option."

"We would like for the files which are coming in that we can version them. So, if a file is accidentally deleted, there should have a recycle bin option where we can go back, and at least once, clean it up."

"The pricing definitely needs to be improved."

"We would like to have backup functionality built-in so that we don't run into the issue where the replication process makes a copy of the corrupted data."

"We were looking for a clustered solution that has over-complicated things because we had it in AWS, which is Amazon. There was a solution for clustered NetApp. That meant there would be two NetApps that were not clustered because there was no solution for a cluster. We would like there to be an HA cluster solution."

"Its pricing can be better."

"Azure NetApp Files could improve by being more diverse to integrate better with other solutions, such as Splunk and the on-premise version. There are some use cases that are not covered natively by Azure. It is not the best solution because it is not external from the cloud which for me is the best type of solution."

"We would like to see more paired regions for the replication."

More Azure NetApp Files cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not a cheap solution, but the price is right for the product."

"The tool's pricing depends on the type of Snowball device you choose, the amount of data you need to transfer, and the service fees involved. There’s a standard price for larger data transfers and a flat job fee, which includes the first ten days of on-site usage. Typically, there are no additional data transfer fees."

"The price of Azure NetApp Files could be better."

"The solution’s combination of the ease of use, simplicity, and reduction in IT management versus the cost has helped a lot. It is very fast to deploy. It's very easy to maintain. You don't have to do a lot in the cloud to maintain this thing, so it gives good performance. It's fast to deploy, easy to maintain, and it gives a better performance. These are the most basic three criteria for any application. This saves cost because the manpower you need to deploy is going down. You're getting better performance and not buying new resources. You have resources available in the cloud. It's just a couple of clicks, then you're good to go."

"In the cloud, pricing depends on how you manage it. It's not necessarily cheap, but it's all about optimizing charges and showing the cost back. So, it's more about managing the expenses rather than being inherently expensive or cheap."

"It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage."

"This solution is very expensive compared to the alternatives."

"Our pricing has not been determined because we are still waiting on additional features."

"Its price is double the price of the premium disks, which is the main reason why customers don't go for this solution in the end."

"It is expensive in small environments, which could be better. The reason is the four terabyte minimum. A one terabyte minimum would be better."

More Azure NetApp Files pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Microsoft Azure Data Box or AWS Snowball?

Microsoft Azure Databox is a 45-pound, super rugged, tamper-resistant, human-managed hardware appliance that can transfer up to 100TB of data capacity to copy, store, then send to the Azure cloud. ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Snowball?

Depending of what is your priority; UseAWS Snowball if you are heavily invested in AWS or need edge computing features Choose Azure Data Box for smooth integration with Azure and potentially lower ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Snowball?

It's difficult to make a comparison and it depends on the customer. When analyzing costs, I must see how the customer uses AWS, Azure, or Google. Google is particularly interesting, for example, fo...

See all answers

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?

Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure NetApp Files?

The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure NetApp Files?

It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage.

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Transfer Appliance vs AWS Snowball

Compared 43% of the time

Microsoft Azure Data Box vs AWS Snowball

Compared 31% of the time

Cloudwick Amorphic Data Platform vs AWS Snowball

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Snowball Edge vs AWS Snowball

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Cloud Mass Data Migration vs AWS Snowball

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS Snowball Competitors

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 20% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon FSx vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure NetApp Files Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Snowball

January 2026

Download AWS Snowball product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files

January 2026

Download Azure NetApp Files product report

Also Known As

Amazon AWS Snowball, Amazon Snowball, Snowball

NetApp ANF, ANF

Overview

Snowball is a petabyte-scale data transport solution that uses devices designed to be secure to transfer large amounts of data into and out of the AWS Cloud. Using Snowball addresses common challenges with large-scale data transfers including high network costs, long transfer times, and security concerns. Customers today use Snowball to migrate analytics data, genomics data, video libraries, image repositories, backups, and to archive part of data center shutdowns, tape replacement or application migration projects. Transferring data with Snowball is simple, fast, more secure, and can be as little as one-fifth the cost of transferring data via high-speed Internet.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure NetApp Files offers flexibility, speed, and tight Active Directory integration, making it versatile. Its scalability, rapid response time, and replication capabilities like SnapMirror enhance its value, along with SEC compliance through SnapLock and efficient database management.

Azure NetApp Files is a robust service for unstructured data storage within Microsoft Azure and on-premises environments. It supports NFS and CIFS protocol testing, SQL backups, SAP virtualization, Azure Virtual Desktop, and event collection. This service facilitates seamless provisioning, non-disruptive resizing, and fast snapshots for disaster recovery. Known for high availability and cost-effective throughput, its ease of use and security make it preferred by users. Issues with high pricing and support highlight areas for enhancement, alongside desires for expanded regional availability, better security, and integration with diverse solutions.

What are the key features of Azure NetApp Files?

Flexibility: Supports diverse applications with robust Active Directory integration.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to increased performance demands.
Fast Snapshotting: Enhances disaster recovery capabilities.
SnapMirror: Provides effective replication features.
SnapLock: Ensures SEC compliance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

High Availability: Delivers reliable performance.
Cost-effective Throughput: Balances performance with expenditure.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data management tasks.
Non-disruptive Resizing: Facilitates seamless storage adjustments.
Enhanced Security: Protects sensitive data effectively.

In educational contexts, Azure NetApp Files shines by offering seamless data handling and high IOPS performance, supporting high-demand environments like research facilities. For enterprises, it aids legacy system migrations and optimizes virtual environments while enhancing data protection and file share performance.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Wazee Digital, Craftsy, Live Nation, Essess

SAP, Restaurant Magic

Buyer's Guide

AWS Snowball vs. Azure NetApp Files

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Snowball vs. Azure NetApp Files

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Snowball vs. Azure NetApp Files and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Snowball vs. Azure NetApp Files report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.