AWS Shield vs Check Point DDoS Protector comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
3,164 views|2,716 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Check Point Software Technologies Logo
709 views|419 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Shield and Check Point DDoS Protector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Shield vs. Check Point DDoS Protector Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I am impressed with the product's multiple features like security.""We have integrated the tool with Active Directory. The most important feature is that it's transparent and doesn't degrade the performance of our solution. Additionally, it's easy to configure, which is crucial for us. It's easy to use and set up and stops attacks on our servers. We haven't encountered any attack problems because the solution stops them in real-time. AWS Shield specifically focuses on defending against denial-of-service attacks, making it a great solution for that type of threat.""The solution's ease of use is the most valuable feature.""It is integrated with AWS. So, it gives you a good first step.""The product has a good mechanism to analyze trends and trigger events."

More AWS Shield Pros →

"As our business continues to grow, we can grow this product simultaneously.""It uses several layers of security.""One of its most outstanding functions is the zero-day DDOS.""Currently, we have fewer incidents with viruses. We improved our IQ operations and security using this solution. Our company's better after using Check Point.""From my experience, the best part of this solution is behavioral DDoS protection. The DDoS Protector can monitor the traffic, and based on the behavior, it can decide which traffic is malicious and which traffic is regular. It works dynamically, and it's a very good solution.""Check Point detects and automatically mitigates attacks, which helps our organization protect our infrastructure.""Check Point DDoS Protector is a product that uses machine learning and behavior analysis.""This comprehensive tool validates and exploits complex vulnerabilities that other vendors fail to find and resolve to increase security."

More Check Point DDoS Protector Pros →

Cons
"The product needs to improve its logs and reports to make it read better.""The product is expensive.""We end up having to pay extra for features that AWS adds that we don't need.""The management of it is a bit hard. If you don't engineer it on the front side, it is hard to go back in and change it. It could be improved in terms of architecture requirements and then ongoing support requirements as a secondary component to it. People tend to set up things like this, and they just expect it to work without the care and feeding that needs to go back into it either from an application team or a network environment team.""The product should give users more flexibility to customize their security policies according to their requirements."

More AWS Shield Cons →

"Monitoring and reporting are the things that can be introduced in the future.""I would like applications for Android and IOS where we can follow the events, and, if necessary, make changes.""For a long time, there was no software version of R80.10 available for the Check Point DDoS Protector software appliances, and we had to stay on the quite outdated R77.30 version.""It does not provide the capability to upload data for blacklisting/whitelisting in bulk.""The mitigation part could be improved.""The public documentation is a detail that must be improved in order to have greater implementations with the best practices in this case of the Check Point manufacturer.""Check Point should develop a DDoS solution because they don't have one and we need to use another solution, in our case, Imperva. This is a problem because we need to have two firewalls. We would like to only have one solution because it would improve the management, we would have fewer incidents, and we wouldn't need to talk to more than one person for support.""The solution should greatly improve its interface."

More Check Point DDoS Protector Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It depends on your subscription level and the volume that you're spending with AWS. So, it is very relative to the consumption alignment in your subscription level. It is a well-constructed, scalable pricing option, but it is relative to how much you're spending on AWS. Because the more you spend, typically, the more you get off on services like this. I find it to be comparable to other solutions."
  • "The cost depends on traffic each month, so on average, it costs us between US$200 and US$300 per month."
  • "We pay $3000 per month for the solution."
  • "The tool's pricing is good."
  • More AWS Shield Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an expensive solution. It's one of the most expensive solutions in the world. It's cheaper than Palo Alto and Cisco but these are expensive solutions. Fortinet is cheaper."
  • "The appliance comes with a loaded hardware license, and additional options such as SSL can be purchased and enabled."
  • "I don't deal with the pricing, but it seems that you need to get basic support in order to upgrade the DDoS database for new attacks and so on."
  • More Check Point DDoS Protector Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We have integrated the tool with Active Directory. The most important feature is that it's transparent and doesn't degrade the performance of our solution. Additionally, it's easy to configure, which… more »
    Top Answer:The product needs to improve its logs and reports to make it read better.
    Top Answer:It can be deployed as a hardware appliance, virtual appliance, or as a cloud service.
    Top Answer:I don't deal with the pricing, but it seems that you need to get basic support in order to upgrade the DDoS database for new attacks and so on.
    Top Answer:Some features are more advanced, however, using them is hard for us. The documentation is not as precise and does not have enough examples to understand how it works. Advanced knowledge is required to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,164
    Comparisons
    2,716
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    605
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    709
    Comparisons
    419
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    518
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Shield is a managed Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection service that safeguards applications running on AWS. AWS Shield provides always-on detection and automatic inline mitigations that minimize application downtime and latency, so there is no need to engage AWS Support to benefit from DDoS protection.

    Modern DDoS attacks use new techniques to exploit areas that traditional security solutions are not equipped to protect. These attacks can cause serious network downtime to businesses who rely on networks and Web services to operate. DDoS Protector Security Appliances and Cloud DDoS Protection Services block destructive DDoS attacks before they cause damage
    Learn more about Ddos Protector.


    Sample Customers
    netflix, dow jones, mapbox, pearson, rovio, youview, moviestar planet, asurion, payplug, hour of code
    Boston Properties
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm42%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Cloud Solution Provider17%
    Computer Software Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Security Firm20%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business72%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Shield vs. Check Point DDoS Protector
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Shield vs. Check Point DDoS Protector and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Shield is ranked 6th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 5 reviews while Check Point DDoS Protector is ranked 12th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 11 reviews. AWS Shield is rated 8.6, while Check Point DDoS Protector is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Shield writes "The solution automatically scales according to traffic, only takes minutes to deploy, and is maintenance-free". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point DDoS Protector writes "Good support and effective against SSL attacks, but the dashboard is complicated". AWS Shield is most compared with Cloudflare, Cloudflare DDoS, Azure DDoS Protection, Akamai App and API Protector and Prolexic, whereas Check Point DDoS Protector is most compared with Radware DefensePro, Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare and Fortinet FortiDDoS. See our AWS Shield vs. Check Point DDoS Protector report.

    See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.

    We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.