

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and NetApp SnapCenter are two prominent products in the disaster recovery market. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery seems to have the upper hand in handling large-scale deployments efficiently, while NetApp SnapCenter excels in integration capabilities.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides comprehensive recovery options, high scalability, and flexibility. It can handle large-scale deployments efficiently. NetApp SnapCenter offers robust integration with various storage solutions, ease of managing backup and recovery tasks, and detailed documentation.
Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could benefit from more intuitive configuration processes, enhanced reporting features, and better user guidance. NetApp SnapCenter needs improved speed and performance, performance optimization in large deployments, and better user experience for large-scale use.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is relatively straightforward to deploy but demands a steep learning curve. Customer service receives high marks for responsiveness. NetApp SnapCenter has a more complex deployment process requiring specialized knowledge, but users appreciate the detailed documentation and support quality.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers competitive pricing with a clear cost structure, delivering substantial ROI, especially for large enterprises. NetApp SnapCenter has higher initial setup costs but provides value through its extensive feature set and reliable performance.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Higher tiers offer faster response time and more direct technical help.
The support from NetApp is very good, and I would rate it as ten points.
The technical support from NetApp is excellent.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability is quite good and we were able to scale this service to many of the services that our company uses.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
Even though we have used multiple products in the private cloud, with NetApp, we haven't found any glitches.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery.
It should be more user-friendly and easier for customers to use.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.
The product should be free because it is just software to administrate systems purchased from NetApp, which are already expensive.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
The product is very stable and easy to install, which saves a significant amount of time during deployment.
Role-based access control and multi-factor authentication are security features available in NetApp SnapCenter.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 0.8% |
| NetApp SnapCenter | 0.9% |
| Other | 98.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
Unified, scalable platform for application-consistent data protection and clone management. This software simplifies backup, restore, and clone lifecycle management with application-integrated workflows.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.