AWS CodeDeploy vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Red Hat are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.7, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.2% mindshare in RA, compared to Red Hat’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeDeploy

Read 13 AWS CodeDeploy reviews

875 Views
431 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Read 69 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews

1,702 Views
433 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AWS CodeDeploy

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and AWS CodeDeploy are competitive solutions in IT automation and deployment. While Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform showcases advantages in pricing and support, AWS CodeDeploy stands out with its comprehensive feature set, balancing performance and value.

Features: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers robust integration options, comprehensive automation capabilities, and open-source flexibility, providing users with extensive customization. AWS CodeDeploy excels at seamless deployment automation within AWS environments and tight integration with AWS services, making it a strong choice for scalability. It has an enhanced feature set for cloud-native environments.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform could benefit from improved GUI features and enhanced orchestration capabilities. Additionally, optimization in handling complex environments would elevate its standing. AWS CodeDeploy could improve by providing more open-source integration options, enhancing multi-cloud support, and offering more comprehensive logging features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is versatile for deployment across various environments and is backed by comprehensive customer support. AWS CodeDeploy offers streamlined deployment processes, especially beneficial for AWS ecosystem workloads, and gains from integrated support with AWS services. Both provide strong customer service, but AWS CodeDeploy's deployment model is particularly efficient for AWS users.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is perceived to offer good ROI due to its flexible pricing structure and extensive support, which may lower the total cost of ownership. AWS CodeDeploy offers high ROI with its pay-as-you-go model, notably for existing AWS infrastructure users, and is generally seen as cost-effective within AWS frameworks, despite possible additional costs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeDeploy

Ranking in Release Automation

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Ranking in Release Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeDeploy is 3.2%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 5.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

MuhammadBilal7

DevOps Engineer at InvoZone

Effective communication with seamless integration improves deployment but tool diversity raises usability questions

There are many tools in the market that cover different aspects, such as the GitOps methodology of deployment. I have not used CodeDeploy with EKS, although I have used it with ECS. I am not sure if CodeDeploy can be used with EKS, and I see this as a deficiency for end users. Easier implementation would be beneficial.

Read full review

Muralitharan KS

Software Architect at OSELabs

Efficient server management and detailed reporting with flexible deployment capabilities

We are primarily using Ansible for automation purposes as it is a configuration management tool. It is utilized for various activities such as DNS activity, changes to web servers, virtual host settings, and other day-to-day tasks, all of which are templated in Ansible Ansible allows us to manage…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very flexible."

"I can integrate it with other AWS services."

"The most valuable features of AWS CodeDeploy are its integration with other AWS services to deploy applications."

"It's just like every other AWS resource I use. It gets the job done."

"The biggest feature of AWS CodeDeploy is its scalability."

"I found the default settings of AWS CodeDeploy to be highly beneficial for my deployment workflows. For instance, when deploying a Node.js application, I manually installed the necessary components on my AWS instance, such as the web server required by developers. Then, I created deployment scripts for starting and stopping instances and performing the deployment itself. These scripts were stored alongside my code in GitHub, ensuring they executed seamlessly with the CI/CD pipeline. Since the project wasn't overly complex, I opted for the default settings, which proved to be efficient and straightforward for deployment."

"The product is easy to use."

"AWS CodeDeploy operates on an on-demand basis. This means that you only pay for the exact duration of the deployment process. Whether it takes one minute, two minutes, or even longer, you're only charged for the time it takes to complete the deployment. You're not locked into paying for dedicated servers."

More AWS CodeDeploy pros

"It is very extensible. There are many plugins and modules out there that everybody helps create to interact with different cloud providers as well."

"It does not require staff for deployment and maintenance. It just works."

"I like the agentless feature. This means we don't install any agent in worker nodes."

"RBAC is great around Organizations and I can use that backend as our lab. Ingesting stuff into the JSON logs, into any sort of logging collector; it works with Splunk and there are other collectors as well. It supports Sumo and that helps, I can go create reports in Sumo Logic. Workflows are an interesting feature. I can collect a lot of templates and create a workflow out of them."

"The biggest thing I liked about Ansible is the check mode so that we can verify, after we've pushed, that the config there is actually what we intended."

"It's nice to have the Dashboard where people can see it, have it report to our ELK stack. It's far more convenient, and we can trigger it with API and schedules, which is better than doing it with a whole bunch of scripts."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is valuable due to the simplicity of the YAML language."

"There are no agents by default, so adding a new server is a matter of a couple lines of configuration (on a new server and the configuration master)."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

Cons

"The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users."

"The support and those things are lacking compared to others."

"I faced some stability issues."

"Deployment and stability should be improved."

"There will always be room for improvement, however, I cannot think of any specific improvements at the moment."

"Improvements could be made to AWS CodeDeploy in terms of its agent's compatibility across different operating systems. Currently, there are instances where the agent may not work seamlessly with certain integrations, leading to issues with registering protocols on authorized servers."

"The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users."

"An improvement for the end users would be easier implementation, especially regarding local testing tools for deployment."

More AWS CodeDeploy cons

"I have seen indications that the documentation needs improvement. They are providing a "How to Improve Your Documentation" presentation at this conference."

"There have been some differences between the operating systems that we have noticed. It could be down to cryptographic policies, but we have noticed some speed issues. They should work on the speed of deployment on different operating systems."

"We are not using the Dashboard a lot because we have higher expectations from it. The default Dashboard from Tower doesn't give that much information. We really want to get down into more than if the job succeeded or what was the percentage of success. We want to get down to task-level success. If, in a job, there are ten tasks, we want to see this task was a success, and this was not, and how many were not. That's the kind of granularity we are looking for, that Tower does not give right now."

"For Ansible Tower, there are three tiers with ten nodes. I would like them to expand those ten nodes to 20, because ten nodes is not enough to test on."

"It is a little slow on the network side because every time you call a module, it's initiating an SSH or an API call to a network device, and it just slows things down."

"The solution is slightly expensive, and its pricing could be improved."

"There could be more stuff in the workflows. I hope that if I have ten templates with different services on it, workflow could auto-populate all the template-based services."

"Improvements should be made in terms of execution speed, which is, I believe, the most lacking feature. Aside from that, re-triggering a failed task is another useful feature."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is costly."

"Since we are using a dedicated AWS environment, the solution's pricing is fine."

"The product is free with EC2."

"The product's price is normal."

"AWS CodeDeploy has proven to be a cost-effective solution for us, especially considering the benefits we gain from using it. In terms of pricing, AWS is quite affordable, providing excellent value for the features and services it offers."

"Users have to pay a per-node cost of around $ 100 per node."

"I don't see the pricing or licensing features, but from what I understand, it is fairly reasonable."

"Ansible Tower is free. Until they lower the cost, we are holding off on purchasing the product."

"Customers need to pay yearly for the license."

"We're charged between $8 to $13 a month per license."

"The pricing is pretty standard."

"Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right now."

"Ansible Tower is pretty expensive."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

11%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

21%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeDeploy?

Automation of Deployments

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeDeploy?

Evaluating cost, it is important to note that the services provided by CodeDeploy can be expensive to purchase from other cloud platforms. However, depending on the services, it might be worth the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeDeploy?

I remember it was a Node.js API that I deployed to some EC2 instances. I was trying to use PM2, a process manager, to deploy the application to the end users.

See all answers

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Amplify vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 46% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 18% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 15% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 12% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 9% of the time

More AWS CodeDeploy Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 6% of the time

BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

May 2025

Download AWS CodeDeploy product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

May 2025

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ansible

Overview

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to any instance, including Amazon EC2 instances and instances running on-premises. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications. You can use AWS CodeDeploy to automate deployments, eliminating the need for error-prone manual operations, and the service scales with your infrastructure so you can easily deploy to one instance or thousands.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a powerful network automation solution that allows organizations to handle every aspect of their application launch process within a single product. It enables users to share their automations so that teams within an organization can collaborate on various projects with ease. Ansible Automation Platform is designed to be used by all employees involved in the network automation process.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform include:

Maximum benefit for reduced overhead. Ansible Automation Platform is an all-in-one solution that can enable users to do the jobs of multiple products with one. Users do not need to purchase multiple products to handle their network automation and application development needs. It is equipped with prefabricated content from more than one hundred companies that are partnered with it.

Scalable. Ansible Automation Platform is a highly scalable solution. It can easily be scaled up so that automations can be extended across the various devices that make up an organization’s network.

Flexibility. Ansible Automation Platform is highly flexible. It enables users to tackle any and all automation-related tasks.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Features

Automation analytics. Ansible Automation Platform comes equipped with an automation analytics feature. This feature enables organizations to measure the effects of their automations and plan how they are going to implement automations moving forward. It makes it easy for administrators to spot anomalies in their automations and resolve them before they can escalate and become major issues.

Integration suite. Ansible Automation Platform gives organizations access to a wide variety of integrations that enable them to connect to Ansible’s partners. Now users can augment their capabilities without needing to purchase additional solutions that will enable them to run features that are not normally a part of Ansible’s array of tools. The Ansible environment is built to handle the wide variety of integrations that their partners offer. In order to accomplish this it includes the APIs that users need in order to fully benefit from the integrations.

Centralized interface. Ansible Automation Platform comes with a centralized GUI interface that enables users to manage all of their network automation and application creation activities from a single location. Businesses can guarantee that their operations are going to be handled efficiently and according to a single standard. The management process is greatly simplified. All of the tools that users need are located in one place.

Reviews from Real Users

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its automation manager and its comprehensive centralized GUI-based management interface.

MD J., a solution architect at STBL, says, “The automation manager is very good and makes things easier for customers with multi-cloud platforms.”

Aankit G., a Consultant at Pi DATACENTERS, writes, “We like the GUI-based interface for the tower. Before, we only had a command-line interface to run all the Ansible tasks. Now, the Ansible tower provides the complete GUI functionality to run, manage, and create the templates and the Ansible jobs. This includes the code and YAML file we can create. The GUI interface is the added advantage of this solution, including some integration with the different plugins.”

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

June 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.