Avanan vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server comparison

Avanan, a Check Point Company and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Email Security category. Avanan, a Check Point Company is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0, while Kaspersky is ranked #33 with an average rating of 6.7. Avanan, a Check Point Company holds a 2.9% mindshare in Email Security, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Avanan, a Check Point Company users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Avanan

Read 18 Avanan reviews

3,007 Views
2,616 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Read 8 Kaspersky Security for Mail Server reviews

855 Views
650 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Avanan

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Avanan and Kaspersky Security for Mail Server compete in the email protection software market. Avanan seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced AI-driven detection capabilities and ease of deployment, which results in higher user satisfaction.

Features: Avanan offers advanced AI-driven detection that identifies sophisticated threats, an anti-malware solution specifically designed for platforms like Office 365 and Box.com, and easy deployment in both cloud and on-premises environments. Kaspersky delivers reliable email communication security, comprehensive monitoring for uploads and downloads, and effectiveness in protecting email exchanges.

Room for Improvement: Avanan could improve SaaS integration, management of secure email risks, user-friendly documentation, and AI logic to reduce false positives. Kaspersky needs to streamline license renewals, enhance system stability, and offer broader customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avanan is known for seamless cloud and on-premises deployment with excellent customer service that acts as an extension of email security teams. Kaspersky, focused on on-premises deployment with some hybrid options, offers knowledgeable customer service that is responsive to user needs.

Pricing and ROI: Avanan provides flexible, user-based pricing models with options for month-to-month or longer commitments based on user numbers, offering potentially high ROI improvements by effectively mitigating email threats. Kaspersky's competitive pricing with straightforward annual subscriptions offers cost advantages similar to those provided by Barracuda.

To learn more, read our detailed Avanan vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Avanan vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avanan

Ranking in Email Security

16th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (28th)

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Ranking in Email Security

33rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Email Security category, the mindshare of Avanan is 2.9%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is 0.6%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Avanan	2.9%
Kaspersky Security for Mail Server	0.6%
Other	96.5%

Email Security

Featured Reviews

Robert Melendez

Vice President Information Technology at Makeready

Enhances email security and has a very simple and easy-to-use UI

Spam protection is the most valuable feature. We have implemented the tool to enhance our email security. It helps prevent phishing attacks. The anomaly detection capabilities are baked into the security platform. The product integrates wonderfully with Microsoft 365. It's built right on a cloud platform and works almost natively. The solution has a very simple and easy-to-use UI. The tool appears extremely powerful and has a good solid feature set. It catches things that are bad for my environment. The user interface is good the way it is. If the solution continues down that path, I see no problems with the way it is going. It feels like a mature product.

Read full review

Zia Syed

Systems Specialist/ Administrator at ALFA International Company Limited.

User interface updates needed but achieves cost savings and threat protection

We are using Kaspersky Security for Mail Server to enhance our email system’s security and protect against threats Kaspersky Security for Mail Server handles spam and phishing attempts well. I have not experienced any spam issues. Its malware detection effectively manages the security of our…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like Avanan's SmartDLP module. It's seamless, and the administrative overhead is low. We aren't a very sophisticated operation. We just want to reduce our exposure, so we find ThreatCloud helpful. Avanan's acquisition by Check Point was beneficial for them."

"Email inspection has saved many employees from spam attacks and viruses from unauthorized sources."

"Easy to use for non-technical users."

"Email Attachment Protection detects any insecure files and quickly blocks them to prevent the spread of viruses to other secure documents."

"Email encryption enhances end to end security of any data before it passes through the networking system."

"It is simple to deploy this platform and interact with the set features."

"The customizable rules allow you to change aspects."

"It can retract unsafe emails and remove them from the entire communication channel."

More Avanan pros

"We have achieved cost savings of up to thirty percent by using Kaspersky Security for Mail Server."

"The most valuable feature is the straightforward setup."

"The most valuable features are the anti-phishing and anti-spam capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a highly reliable and dependable solution."

"The integration rate is very high in Kaspersky, which is why most of our customers like it."

"Kaspersky Security for Mail Server provides protection against email spams and blacklisted emails which are suspicious, making it a good product."

"I find the product valuable because it provides easy integration with other platforms like Fortinet firewalls."

"You can install the plugins on the same machine hosting your exchange solution. It's a good complement for Sophos security, which scans the traffic before it reaches your mail service. Kaspersky is on the mail server itself while Sophos handles the incoming traffic. With both of them working together, we have the perfect solution for mail."

Cons

"It should reduce the amount of time needed for thorough scanning."

"Being cloud first and because we are in the movie business, we use a lot of Macintoshes. So, there is absolutely no reason for us to have Active Directory whatsoever. However, if you are using Office 365, you must have Active Directory in order to reset passwords. Even though we have a single sign-on provider, we must have Azure Active Directory for Office 365, which is really stupid. As a cloud application, you would think that I don't need Active Directory, which I don't need for anything else except Office 365. We have one server inside that space to help us manage Active Directory just for Office 365. This is a very sore point, but it is what it is."

"The system response in a slow computing device affects performance when sending and receiving emails."

"In Avanan, the email channel is one of the channels where data leakage happens, and they need to consider it from a DLP perspective."

"Avanan doesn't cover certain tool segments."

"The system could be designed to give corporate emails first priority due to demands."

"When sending bulky emails, the system slows down and takes a long time before it responds effectively to our requests."

"There are times when we have false positives."

More Avanan cons

"Encrypted email attachments are not being monitored by this solution, which is an area that they need to work on."

"Kaspersky lacks in the area of customization, so simpler customization options need to be provided to users."

"The biggest problem in the solution is related to its license renewal since it is pretty hard in Kaspersky to find out the procedure to renew a license."

"The solution is not 100 percent stable and that can use improvement."

"It would be great if Kaspersky could do what Sophos does for us. However, we love having these two different technologies doing the same thing. Sometimes Sophos has the patch to block a novel threat, but Kaspersky doesn't."

"I rated the overall solution a five out of ten. If a user is looking for a low-budget solution with mid-level security without AI features, Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is suitable."

"I have only made contact via email, and it is a little slow. I would give customer service a rating of six or seven. Improving Spanish support would greatly benefit users."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of Avanan is reasonable."

"The product is not the cheapest in the market."

"Good pricing arrangement as an SaaS offering."

"Avanan’s price is comparable to Barracuda."

"Having the flexibility and modeling to do the pricing that best fits the needs of the organization is incredibly ideal. That is what Avanan does. They know exactly how many users are using it, etc. We can tune the invoicing associated with how we are using the product so we can charge it back to the shows appropriately."

"The solution offers one of the best prices possible to its users, making it even better than Barracuda. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is ten times cheaper than Barracuda."

"Price-wise, I would rate this product a four out of five. It could be a bit cheaper."

"The solution is not expensive."

"My company makes annual payments towards the licensing costs solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Retailer

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Avanan?

Spam protection is the most valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Avanan?

Avanan’s price is comparable to Barracuda.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Avanan?

Avanan doesn't cover certain tool segments. Barracuda provides backup and retention of emails and Microsoft 365’s backup and retention services. I've brought this up with the vendor. They told me t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

The pricing is moderate. It is not expensive but not cheap either. For Mexico, a good price is about 20 dollars per agent.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

Regarding Kaspersky Security for Mail Server, I have not compared with other solutions, but I will compare and provide feedback. It is a reliable and fast security solution, and I can say it blocks...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

I work on a mail protection service, specifically Kaspersky Security for Mail Server. I work with Kaspersky Security for Mail Server.

See all answers

Comparisons

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Avanan

Compared 9% of the time

Abnormal Security vs Avanan

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Avanan

Compared 9% of the time

Perception Point Advanced Email Security vs Avanan

Compared 6% of the time

INKY Email Security Platform vs Avanan

Compared 6% of the time

More Avanan Competitors

Fortinet FortiMail vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 15% of the time

Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 14% of the time

Security Gateway vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiMail Cloud vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 9% of the time

Sophos Email vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 8% of the time

More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avanan

January 2026

Download Avanan product report

Buyer's Guide

Email Security

January 2026

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server report

Download Kaspersky Security for Mail Server product report

Overview

Avanan offers advanced threat detection for protecting against phishing and malware, utilizing strong AI algorithms and seamless integration with platforms like Office 365. Its cloud-based, customizable security rules ensure efficient data protection suitable for diverse organizational sizes.

Avanan's platform is designed for email security across cloud and on-premises environments, protecting against threats like ransomware and DDoS attacks. With features such as real-time threat detection and advanced filtering, it integrates effortlessly with Microsoft 365. Organizations appreciate its user-friendly interface that allows for easy deployment and management. While possessing cost-effective qualities, Avanan might improve in SaaS integration, AI logic, and technical support with Check Point. Some users suggest enhancements like better mobile compatibility and faster threat response. The system's documentation and querying functionalities could also see refinement, addressing concerns for SMEs.

What are Avanan's key features?

Advanced Threat Detection: Quickly identifies phishing and malware.
Anti-Malware: Supports Office 365 and Box.com with strong AI algorithms.
Sandboxing Capability: Quarantines suspicious emails efficiently.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with tools like Office 365 and Slack.
Customizable Security: Offers cloud-based, always-on protection.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-Effectiveness: Ideal for organizations of all sizes.
Ease of Implementation: Quick and easy setup process.
User-Friendly Management: Simplifies threat management and data protection.
Enhanced Data Protection: Comprehensive security across environments.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Avanan is implemented widely to protect sensitive communications and ensure compliance with data protection regulations. Its flexibility makes it suitable for sectors requiring robust security measures, leveraging cloud-based solutions for real-time threat mitigation and data leak prevention.

Avanan, a Check Point Company

Email is the number one vector used by cybercriminals to penetrate and attack enterprise IT systems.

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server uses Next Generation technologies including advanced heuristics, machine learning and sandboxing to detect and protect against ransomware, spam, phishing, data loss and even unknown threats penetrating your IT systems through emails and malicious attachments.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

Bethel School District, ServiceSource, Capital Caring

Vimpel Com, Estrella Galicia, Krombacher

Buyer's Guide

Avanan vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

December 2025

Free Report: Avanan vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Avanan vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avanan vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server report.

See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.