Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Sysdig Monitor comparison

The compared Auvik and Sysdig solutions aren't in the same category. Auvik is ranked #3 in NMS , with an average rating of 8.6, and holds a 1.3% mindshare in the category. Sysdig is ranked #9 in DCM , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Sysdig users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 208 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

16,920 Views
11,506 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Sysdig Monitor

Read 4 Sysdig Monitor reviews

1,367 Views
451 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Sysdig Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Sysdig Monitor and Auvik Network Management compete in the network monitoring and management space, each tailored to distinct needs. Sysdig Monitor seems to have the upper hand in cloud-native strategies with its container management and security insights, while Auvik is better suited for on-premise and hybrid environments with its comprehensive network visibility and automation.

Features: Sysdig Monitor offers deep integration with Kubernetes, real-time threat detection, and detailed container performance analysis, providing scalability and flexibility crucial for dynamic environments. Auvik provides automated network mapping, robust monitoring capabilities across various devices, and simplified management through automation, which is ideal for infrastructure-focused IT environments. These features highlight Sysdig's focus on container ecosystems, whereas Auvik emphasizes network automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sysdig Monitor supports various cloud integrations with a deployment model requiring technical proficiency and provides a robust support system for ongoing optimization. Auvik features a straightforward deployment with its agentless setup and extensive documentation, along with intuitive tools for small and medium-sized businesses. The decisive factor here is Sysdig's alignment with cloud-native setups compared to Auvik's ease of integrating with existing networks.

Pricing and ROI: Sysdig Monitor has a flexible pricing model aligned with cloud resource usage, offering predictable scaling costs. Auvik features a more traditional pricing model with potentially higher initial setup costs but provides significant ROI through automated management efficiencies. The distinction lies in Sysdig's value for cloud-centric models against Auvik's cost-effectiveness linked to on-premise networks.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Sysdig Monitor Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Sysdig Monitor

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 896,692 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (4th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

Sysdig Monitor

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Monitoring (9th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Systems Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Auvik Network Management (ANM) is designed for Network Monitoring Software and holds a mindshare of 1.3%, up 0.9% compared to last year.
Sysdig Monitor, on the other hand, focuses on Container Monitoring, holds 3.1% mindshare, up 0.5% since last year.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.3%
Zabbix	3.9%
SolarWinds NPM	3.6%
Other	91.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Container Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Sysdig Monitor	3.1%
Dynatrace	23.3%
Datadog	19.8%
Other	53.8%

Container Monitoring

Featured Reviews

RobertVergeer

Network Administrator at i-level automatisering

Network monitoring has provided clear end-to-end visibility and has reduced troubleshooting time

Regarding the dashboard, it is not as customizable as I would like it to be, or at least as we would like it to be. I have experience with some other products, such as LogicMonitor. It has a very enhanced interface to make your own custom dashboards for exactly what you need. That is not possible within Auvik. It is more defined by them. I would consider dashboard customization flexibility a room for improvement in Auvik Network Management (ANM). I needed more server information from Auvik Network Management (ANM). I also discussed that with Auvik, and I think the best thing that they can do to enhance their product spread in the world is to make server management also possible with the product. Most importantly, Auvik Network Management (ANM) does not have server monitoring and server hardware monitoring, which LogicMonitor has, and these features make me continue to use LogicMonitor. We have approximately 70% of server monitoring that we do in our company because we still have a lot of on-premises servers running, and Auvik is not going to provide us enough to change to Auvik.

Read full review

Bharath Nadar

Senior Staff Site Reliability Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Centralized host monitoring has reduced operational overhead and provides trusted dashboards

Sysdig Monitor could be improved, particularly regarding application monitoring. There are specific areas or features where improvement is needed, specifically in application-level monitoring. While other monitoring solutions provide APM capabilities, Sysdig Monitor does not and targets only host-based monitoring. Many applications require APM support, and we want to introduce OpenTelemetry into some applications to gain more insights, but with Sysdig Monitor, we could not implement this functionality, so we have to opt for solutions from other vendors for those applications. Beyond the APM and OpenTelemetry support limitations, I would appreciate seeing Sysdig Monitor offer a unified solution for all monitoring needs, including logging as well, eventually bringing whole observability under one roof. That would be ideal.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The traffic insights feature shows us our network bandwidth usage without the need for expensive inline traffic decryption. It's very important to us. Knowing exactly what's going on, what traffic is flowing over my network is very much an important thing for me to know. We know that policies and procedures are being followed. And so we know that nobody is doing anything that they shouldn't be doing on a company network."

"Auvik just works out-of-the-box."

"I find Auvik's intuitive interface a welcome change from the complex network management platforms I've used."

"In my experience as an MSP, Auvik stood out for its ease of deployment."

"I have found Auvik extremely stable. They do a lot of scheduled maintenance, but it's almost always on the weekends, so it doesn't impact us."

"The time-to-value, for me, was almost immediate; once we started implementation, I was able to start seeing stuff even on day one, and by the time we had it fully implemented, I was already seeing value out of it."

"The most valuable feature of Auvik is the remote access functionality."

"Despite the sluggishness of the interface, it has definitely provided a significant amount of value for us."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like first class citizens."

"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."

"Sysdig Monitor impressed me with its in-depth visibility into my infrastructure."

"Sysdig Monitor has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing operational costs and improving our ability to monitor our systems effectively."

"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like "first class citizens"."

"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."

Cons

"The training is not intuitive."

"For pulling up the devices, the dashboard is a little bit sluggish. I know there is a lot of data, and I am starting to get nitpicky here, but this is the only thing. The dashboard is a little sluggish, and you have to keep the filter on sometimes."

"They can maybe provide some more best practices or guidance around how large a network should be. They can provide some cutoff points, such as, if you have 30 network devices, you might want to chunk that into a smaller subset or site. They can help you better plan and design how to create your Auvik sites, especially if you have a large environment."

"I'd like better integration with Meraki and a history feature for network diagrams. If a device fails on Saturday, we can't find it by Monday. A history or PDF export of diagrams would be great to see how devices should be connected."

"Sometimes it's a little bit slow to load, but I can't think of anything else that could be improved."

"It should be easier to see Mac addresses."

"Auvik's network map could be better. It's a little confusing at times and not always accurate. I wish it showed the connections between switches on the map. You can find that by drilling down into the network device, but that isn't visible on the map as far as I know."

"The price shouldn't be an issue for a larger organization, but a smaller organization or an MSP might struggle because the billing is per device. You're paying for your firewalls and devices that appear on the network. If you have a smaller organization with an extensive network, your revenue won't be able to support that cost. That's probably the biggest downside for me."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"It is needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."

"I had difficulty installing Sysdig Monitor on Windows."

""Events" reporting (errors, crashes, etc.) is not clear at all in a Mesos environment (i.e., it's not clear what specific container is the one that went down). In a Docker Compose environment, it may be way better."

"It needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."

"Sysdig Monitor could be improved, particularly regarding application monitoring."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair for the value and time saved that you get out of it. The larger you go, the more sense it makes per device, because as you hit different pricing tiers, it becomes much more affordable per device."

"It's priced fairly, avoiding any underestimation of its value."

"Auvik isn't cheap. There are two tiers: Essentials and Performance. We're still on the Essentials plan, but we may upgrade to Performance, which is double the price."

"The billing is excellent. The way they bill it, in most environments, it's not that expensive. The billing is very cost-effective."

"The pricing seems fairly competitive with what may be out there. We haven't looked around too much, but the pricing is very reasonable."

"Its pricing is a little on the high end. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. It is more expensive than other solutions, but their per-device model is very fair. Anything other than the networking gear is monitored by Auvik at no charge."

"As an individual IP company, Auvik is a little bit pricey. It is a little expensive, but as an MSP owner, I have a small side business. So, I'm an Auvik customer in that sense too. In that, I think it's reasonable to pay $10 to $15 a device or less depending on the endpoint. For the amount of capability that it has, it is very reasonably priced."

"Auvik is a good product and worth the premium price tag for a lot of people."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

"Sysdig Monitor is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	146
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	23

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) is not costly, but pricing is based on how many licenses are taken, and that can be improved.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

One improvement that would be really beneficial for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is the ability to get alerts sent to me via text. Right now, the only alerts I can get are via email. Receiving al...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

My main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is managing our overall network and being able to have insight into all of the devices, switches, servers, firewalls, and access points on the ne...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sysdig Monitor?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good. Before moving forward with Sysdig Monitor, we analyzed many other tools, and the costing was more transparent and significantly bette...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sysdig Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sysdig Monitor?

Sysdig Monitor has become essential for overseeing a vast array of hosts and EC2 instances across our environment. We initially tried Grafana, but it fell short in operational capabilities. Managin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 21% of the time

Dynatrace vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

Sysdig Secure vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

More Sysdig Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

May 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Monitoring

May 2026

Download Sysdig Monitor product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

Sysdig Monitor is a comprehensive cloud-native performance monitoring and troubleshooting tool designed to optimize container and microservices environments through advanced data capture and analysis technology.

Ideal for professionals seeking robust visibility in containerized environments, Sysdig Monitor leverages service intelligence to simplify collecting, analyzing, and visualizing data across dynamic infrastructures. It enhances monitoring accuracy by integrating seamlessly with container platforms like Kubernetes and OpenShift, providing actionable insights that help teams identify and address performance bottlenecks quickly.

What are the essential features of Sysdig Monitor?

Real-Time Visibility: Offers continuous insights into system performance across different layers.
Kubernetes Monitoring: Dedicated features to streamline Kubernetes performance analyses.
Prometheus Metrics: Supports Prometheus to manage and visualize metrics seamlessly.
Custom Dashboards: Allows tailored dashboards for specific monitoring needs.

Which benefits or ROI should be expected?

Improved Troubleshooting Efficiency: Reduces time spent solving performance issues.
Cost Management: Optimizes resource allocation to prevent overspending.
Enhanced Collaboration: Strengthens team cooperation through shared insights.

Sysdig Monitor is adaptable across industries including finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it supports regulatory compliance by maintaining data integrity. Healthcare uses it to ensure system reliability for critical patient data applications. Retail benefits from its capacity to handle seasonal traffic spikes effectively.

Sysdig

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

SAP Concur, Goldman Sachs, Worldpay by FIS, Cisco, Experian, Home Office, Societe Generale, Sunrun. More here: https://sysdig.com/customers/

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Sysdig Monitor

July 2025

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Sysdig Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Sysdig Monitor and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Sysdig Monitor report.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.