Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Sysdig Monitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Auvik and Sysdig solutions aren't in the same category. Auvik is ranked #4 in NMS , with an average rating of 8.6, and holds a 1.2% mindshare in the category. Sysdig is ranked #9 in DCM , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Sysdig users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 216 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,634 Views
12,485 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Sysdig Monitor

Read 4 Sysdig Monitor reviews

1,714 Views
617 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Sysdig Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Sysdig Monitor and Auvik Network Management compete in the network monitoring and management space, each tailored to distinct needs. Sysdig Monitor seems to have the upper hand in cloud-native strategies with its container management and security insights, while Auvik is better suited for on-premise and hybrid environments with its comprehensive network visibility and automation.

Features: Sysdig Monitor offers deep integration with Kubernetes, real-time threat detection, and detailed container performance analysis, providing scalability and flexibility crucial for dynamic environments. Auvik provides automated network mapping, robust monitoring capabilities across various devices, and simplified management through automation, which is ideal for infrastructure-focused IT environments. These features highlight Sysdig's focus on container ecosystems, whereas Auvik emphasizes network automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sysdig Monitor supports various cloud integrations with a deployment model requiring technical proficiency and provides a robust support system for ongoing optimization. Auvik features a straightforward deployment with its agentless setup and extensive documentation, along with intuitive tools for small and medium-sized businesses. The decisive factor here is Sysdig's alignment with cloud-native setups compared to Auvik's ease of integrating with existing networks.

Pricing and ROI: Sysdig Monitor has a flexible pricing model aligned with cloud resource usage, offering predictable scaling costs. Auvik features a more traditional pricing model with potentially higher initial setup costs but provides significant ROI through automated management efficiencies. The distinction lies in Sysdig's value for cloud-centric models against Auvik's cost-effectiveness linked to on-premise networks.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,351 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

216

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

Sysdig Monitor

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Monitoring (9th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Systems Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Auvik Network Management (ANM) is designed for Network Monitoring Software and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 1.0% compared to last year.
Sysdig Monitor, on the other hand, focuses on Container Monitoring, holds 3.3% mindshare, up 1.2% since last year.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.2%
Zabbix	3.6%
SolarWinds NPM	3.6%
Other	91.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Container Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Sysdig Monitor	3.3%
Dynatrace	21.3%
Splunk AppDynamics	19.0%
Other	56.4%

Container Monitoring

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

Bharath Nadar

Senior Staff Site Reliability Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Centralized host monitoring has reduced operational overhead and provides trusted dashboards

Sysdig Monitor could be improved, particularly regarding application monitoring. There are specific areas or features where improvement is needed, specifically in application-level monitoring. While other monitoring solutions provide APM capabilities, Sysdig Monitor does not and targets only host-based monitoring. Many applications require APM support, and we want to introduce OpenTelemetry into some applications to gain more insights, but with Sysdig Monitor, we could not implement this functionality, so we have to opt for solutions from other vendors for those applications. Beyond the APM and OpenTelemetry support limitations, I would appreciate seeing Sysdig Monitor offer a unified solution for all monitoring needs, including logging as well, eventually bringing whole observability under one roof. That would be ideal.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has significantly decreased our mean time to resolution."

"The stand-out feature is the automated config backup on networking devices. This automation is handy in a bind when a machine crashes, and you need to pull the config out of Auvik."

"Overall, I rate Auvik Network Management (ANM) a nine out of ten."

"I found the ease of setup to be a helpful feature. The appliance was quite quick to get running. The fact that Auvik is a cloud-based solution, as opposed to an on-prem solution, meant there was one less thing to worry about. I didn't have to configure another device or provision a server and support it myself."

"I appreciate the automatization of the dashboard monitoring, the automatic mapping of the network, and the easy deployment of the service."

"I like Auvik's SNMP capabilities. Seeing all the metrics and analytics in one dashboard is a game-changer. The topology is excellent."

"Auvik's cloud SaaS model saves money because we don't need to maintain devices or pay for overhead on our end."

"The primary reason I wanted Auvik was SNMP. It discovers all the MIBs and pulls them. That's how it can monitor the things that other platforms don't."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like "first class citizens"."

"Sysdig Monitor has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing operational costs and improving our ability to monitor our systems effectively."

"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."

"Sysdig Monitor impressed me with its in-depth visibility into my infrastructure."

Cons

"The deployment could be better. It's something that we've done recently. Auvik uses something called a collector, and I added a collector to our main site. I only added it to the main site, but when it came to adding additional sites because this was in the testing phase, I had to reconfigure that collector. It wasn't overly clear about how to do that and how to share. They call it sharing a collector. I had to mess around a bit to reconfigure that collector and add some new sites."

"The menu bar and display could be more colorful."

"It should be easier to see Mac addresses."

"There is a big learning curve with Auvik Network Management (ANM)."

"I'd like to see some enhancements to Auvik's network map, including the ability to focus on specific areas without viewing the entire map."

"I chose eight out of ten because sometimes I face slow performance issues, which is why I am cutting two points from the score."

"They can definitely build more alerts."

"They can maybe provide some more best practices or guidance around how large a network should be. They can provide some cutoff points, such as, if you have 30 network devices, you might want to chunk that into a smaller subset or site. They can help you better plan and design how to create your Auvik sites, especially if you have a large environment."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"It is needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."

"Sysdig Monitor could be improved, particularly regarding application monitoring."

""Events" reporting (errors, crashes, etc.) is not clear at all in a Mesos environment (i.e., it's not clear what specific container is the one that went down). In a Docker Compose environment, it may be way better."

"I had difficulty installing Sysdig Monitor on Windows."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model makes a lot of sense and it's pretty reasonable considering it's based on the Managed Network devices that we have out there."

"The cost for all the devices that we were billed at in my last job was about $2500 annually. It wasn't much. It has the most reasonable pricing as compared to any product out there. I can't complain. It is amazing. It allows me to bundle inside the package what I charge customers per user per month. I don't charge them per device anymore. That's not how we do things in the industry. It is per user per month. The way Auvik is charging us allows me to do it. For example, if they charge $250 for a certain number of seats, I'm just going to write the costs onto per user per month. I have a few leftover licenses to use, which allows me to go out and make some more sales and give some freebies at some shows. So, it makes me very flexible. I am very happy with it. It is billed by network devices. You could choose which billable device you want. What is really nice is that if you don't want one switch to be billable and the other one to be billable, you can do that. You just won't have the features that the billable switch has, which isn't horrible. Sometimes, you don't need that. What I'm really happy about is that Auvik doesn't force things on you and doesn't say, "You have to have all of this," and that's a great business model."

"Compared to Auvik's competitors, its pricing is largely in line with SolarWinds."

"Auvik Network Management's pricing was surprisingly reasonable."

"Auvik is definitely one of the more expensive platforms. It is not cheap at all. If cost is an issue, Auvik isn't on the table at all, but they do have a fantastic solution for the cost. If budget isn't a concern, they are probably the market leader. We migrated away from it to a competitor called Domotz because of pricing. Auvik bills per what they call a billable device, which is a firewall, a switch, and a controller. All of those count as billable devices. Domotz, as an alternative, bills per site. It's a flat fee for the whole site. So, whether you've got 3 switches or 10 switches, it's the same cost."

"I can't speak to the cost; I'm an engineer. Auvik has a subscription-based pricing option, and the other solution we evaluated had high upfront costs."

"Auvik is a cost-efficient solution for the applications we use it for."

"Another reason that we picked Auvik was that its pricing is very good. The only non-open-source solution that had better pricing was PRTG, but Auvik had it beat in ease of use. All-around, Auvik has a really great price for the market."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

"Sysdig Monitor is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	156
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is average. The cost is typically higher for these kinds of tools, so it is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sysdig Monitor?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good. Before moving forward with Sysdig Monitor, we analyzed many other tools, and the costing was more transparent and significantly bette...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sysdig Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sysdig Monitor?

Sysdig Monitor has become essential for overseeing a vast array of hosts and EC2 instances across our environment. We initially tried Grafana, but it fell short in operational capabilities. Managin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 20% of the time

Dynatrace vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Sysdig Secure vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Zenoss Cloud vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Sysdig Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

September 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Monitoring

August 2026

Download Sysdig Monitor product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

Sysdig Monitor is a comprehensive cloud-native performance monitoring and troubleshooting tool designed to optimize container and microservices environments through advanced data capture and analysis technology.

Ideal for professionals seeking robust visibility in containerized environments, Sysdig Monitor leverages service intelligence to simplify collecting, analyzing, and visualizing data across dynamic infrastructures. It enhances monitoring accuracy by integrating seamlessly with container platforms like Kubernetes and OpenShift, providing actionable insights that help teams identify and address performance bottlenecks quickly.

What are the essential features of Sysdig Monitor?

Real-Time Visibility: Offers continuous insights into system performance across different layers.
Kubernetes Monitoring: Dedicated features to streamline Kubernetes performance analyses.
Prometheus Metrics: Supports Prometheus to manage and visualize metrics seamlessly.
Custom Dashboards: Allows tailored dashboards for specific monitoring needs.

Which benefits or ROI should be expected?

Improved Troubleshooting Efficiency: Reduces time spent solving performance issues.
Cost Management: Optimizes resource allocation to prevent overspending.
Enhanced Collaboration: Strengthens team cooperation through shared insights.

Sysdig Monitor is adaptable across industries including finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it supports regulatory compliance by maintaining data integrity. Healthcare uses it to ensure system reliability for critical patient data applications. Retail benefits from its capacity to handle seasonal traffic spikes effectively.

Sysdig

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

SAP Concur, Goldman Sachs, Worldpay by FIS, Cisco, Experian, Home Office, Societe Generale, Sunrun. More here: https://sysdig.com/customers/

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, SolarWinds, Datadog and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.