Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Sysdig Monitor comparison

The compared Auvik and Sysdig solutions aren't in the same category. Auvik is ranked #4 in NMS , with an average rating of 8.7, and holds a 1.3% mindshare in the category. Sysdig is ranked #9 in DCM , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Sysdig users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 216 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,261 Views
12,417 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Sysdig Monitor

Read 4 Sysdig Monitor reviews

1,548 Views
557 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Sysdig Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Sysdig Monitor and Auvik Network Management compete in the network monitoring and management space, each tailored to distinct needs. Sysdig Monitor seems to have the upper hand in cloud-native strategies with its container management and security insights, while Auvik is better suited for on-premise and hybrid environments with its comprehensive network visibility and automation.

Features: Sysdig Monitor offers deep integration with Kubernetes, real-time threat detection, and detailed container performance analysis, providing scalability and flexibility crucial for dynamic environments. Auvik provides automated network mapping, robust monitoring capabilities across various devices, and simplified management through automation, which is ideal for infrastructure-focused IT environments. These features highlight Sysdig's focus on container ecosystems, whereas Auvik emphasizes network automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sysdig Monitor supports various cloud integrations with a deployment model requiring technical proficiency and provides a robust support system for ongoing optimization. Auvik features a straightforward deployment with its agentless setup and extensive documentation, along with intuitive tools for small and medium-sized businesses. The decisive factor here is Sysdig's alignment with cloud-native setups compared to Auvik's ease of integrating with existing networks.

Pricing and ROI: Sysdig Monitor has a flexible pricing model aligned with cloud resource usage, offering predictable scaling costs. Auvik features a more traditional pricing model with potentially higher initial setup costs but provides significant ROI through automated management efficiencies. The distinction lies in Sysdig's value for cloud-centric models against Auvik's cost-effectiveness linked to on-premise networks.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

216

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

Sysdig Monitor

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Monitoring (9th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Systems Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Auvik Network Management (ANM) is designed for Network Monitoring Software and holds a mindshare of 1.3%, up 1.0% compared to last year.
Sysdig Monitor, on the other hand, focuses on Container Monitoring, holds 3.3% mindshare, up 0.9% since last year.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.3%
Zabbix	3.8%
SolarWinds NPM	3.7%
Other	91.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Container Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Sysdig Monitor	3.3%
Dynatrace	21.9%
Splunk AppDynamics	18.7%
Other	56.1%

Container Monitoring

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

Bharath Nadar

Senior Staff Site Reliability Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Centralized host monitoring has reduced operational overhead and provides trusted dashboards

Sysdig Monitor could be improved, particularly regarding application monitoring. There are specific areas or features where improvement is needed, specifically in application-level monitoring. While other monitoring solutions provide APM capabilities, Sysdig Monitor does not and targets only host-based monitoring. Many applications require APM support, and we want to introduce OpenTelemetry into some applications to gain more insights, but with Sysdig Monitor, we could not implement this functionality, so we have to opt for solutions from other vendors for those applications. Beyond the APM and OpenTelemetry support limitations, I would appreciate seeing Sysdig Monitor offer a unified solution for all monitoring needs, including logging as well, eventually bringing whole observability under one roof. That would be ideal.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ease of use is awesome."

"I like the ability to see bandwidth utilization on all the interfaces, and the automatic configuration backups are also useful."

"The time-to-value was instantaneous, and once we got the deployment done, it immediately allowed us to better support networks in a proactive manner."

"The monitoring and alerting are the most valuable features."

"We saw several warnings on several of our older switches. We would not have seen this stuff unless we had gone into these switches and read through these logs on our own, but Auvik was holding this data and giving us these warnings so that we could go in and sort out what was wrong."

"From a product perspective, it's a 10 out of 10."

"Auvik is easy to use. It took some time to set it up, and they were pretty good to us. They offered us around six sessions with a technician to help us set up the monitors we wanted. After we were trained properly, I had no issues using it."

"What I appreciate most about Auvik Network Management (ANM) is the alerting system."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."

"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like "first class citizens"."

"Sysdig Monitor impressed me with its in-depth visibility into my infrastructure."

"Sysdig Monitor has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing operational costs and improving our ability to monitor our systems effectively."

Cons

"We had some issues with the licensing. You need to pay for premium to use NetFlow, and we had a problem with them counting the same device multiple times for licensing purposes. It was a little frustrating because the Auvik database in the background didn't see it as a single device even though it came from the same critical hardware and only had one serial number. However, it was in different groups, so it was counted two or three times. It took a while to work with the accounting team to get that sorted."

"I would relegate the network map to its area instead of being the focus of every page. The network map is in the front and center of the UI. I would rather have the option to look at it when I need it instead of having it on every single page. It's beautiful, but I don't need it on every page."

"I want to be able to customize the layout more in terms of showing the alert timeframes. For example, I would like to customize it to show all the alerts in the last three hours, six hours, etc. You should be able to customize it so that it shows you the most critical information. We don't need to see CPU usage. We only want to see the up and down time. It would be nice to filter out many of those metrics we don't use."

"The window view could be improved. For instance, if I'm in inventory and I'm looking at my devices, I don't like the way the window splits at the bottom. I want to be able to choose the way it appears. Similarly, when it shows me all the devices on my network, I don't like the fact that I can't adjust the display to the way I want it."

"Because we can't monitor as we would like, we aren't introducing anything more to the platform at the moment."

"I chose eight out of ten because sometimes I face slow performance issues, which is why I am cutting two points from the score."

"Auvik Network Management needs to improve its operational technology coverage."

"If they could expand the products they support, that would be ideal."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"It is needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."

"Sysdig Monitor could be improved, particularly regarding application monitoring."

"I had difficulty installing Sysdig Monitor on Windows."

""Events" reporting (errors, crashes, etc.) is not clear at all in a Mesos environment (i.e., it's not clear what specific container is the one that went down). In a Docker Compose environment, it may be way better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's great for small businesses, but when you start reviewing the pricing model, depending on how many devices, and what sub-devices you decide to pull in, it can get tricky as far as the pricing goes."

"As an individual IP company, Auvik is a little bit pricey. It is a little expensive, but as an MSP owner, I have a small side business. So, I'm an Auvik customer in that sense too. In that, I think it's reasonable to pay $10 to $15 a device or less depending on the endpoint. For the amount of capability that it has, it is very reasonably priced."

"The price for Auvik is affordable."

"I'm an engineer, so I'm unfamiliar with the cost of Auvik and the other options on the market. My advice to those concerned about pricing is to do their homework and compare all the offerings. They could also demo Auvik to see if it meets their needs and justifies the cost."

"For the size of our school, it is expensive, but I understand the reason behind the pricing."

"Auvik is definitely one of the more expensive platforms. It is not cheap at all. If cost is an issue, Auvik isn't on the table at all, but they do have a fantastic solution for the cost. If budget isn't a concern, they are probably the market leader. We migrated away from it to a competitor called Domotz because of pricing. Auvik bills per what they call a billable device, which is a firewall, a switch, and a controller. All of those count as billable devices. Domotz, as an alternative, bills per site. It's a flat fee for the whole site. So, whether you've got 3 switches or 10 switches, it's the same cost."

"I don't work in the finance department, so I'm not familiar with the pricing details; however, I know some clients declined Auvik due to the pricing, so they found it expensive. Other clients have adopted it, so they think it's worth the cost."

"If you're a small company, Auvik is probably quite reasonable. But we've got 500 servers, so pricing suddenly became a lot more of an issue. There needs to be better bulk pricing for it."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

"Sysdig Monitor is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	155
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

I am from the technical department, so the pricing, setup cost, and licensing aspects have been managed by the management.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sysdig Monitor?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good. Before moving forward with Sysdig Monitor, we analyzed many other tools, and the costing was more transparent and significantly bette...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sysdig Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sysdig Monitor?

Sysdig Monitor has become essential for overseeing a vast array of hosts and EC2 instances across our environment. We initially tried Grafana, but it fell short in operational capabilities. Managin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

Dynatrace vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 16% of the time

Sysdig Secure vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Zenoss Cloud vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

More Sysdig Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

August 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Monitoring

July 2026

Download Sysdig Monitor product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

Sysdig Monitor is a comprehensive cloud-native performance monitoring and troubleshooting tool designed to optimize container and microservices environments through advanced data capture and analysis technology.

Ideal for professionals seeking robust visibility in containerized environments, Sysdig Monitor leverages service intelligence to simplify collecting, analyzing, and visualizing data across dynamic infrastructures. It enhances monitoring accuracy by integrating seamlessly with container platforms like Kubernetes and OpenShift, providing actionable insights that help teams identify and address performance bottlenecks quickly.

What are the essential features of Sysdig Monitor?

Real-Time Visibility: Offers continuous insights into system performance across different layers.
Kubernetes Monitoring: Dedicated features to streamline Kubernetes performance analyses.
Prometheus Metrics: Supports Prometheus to manage and visualize metrics seamlessly.
Custom Dashboards: Allows tailored dashboards for specific monitoring needs.

Which benefits or ROI should be expected?

Improved Troubleshooting Efficiency: Reduces time spent solving performance issues.
Cost Management: Optimizes resource allocation to prevent overspending.
Enhanced Collaboration: Strengthens team cooperation through shared insights.

Sysdig Monitor is adaptable across industries including finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it supports regulatory compliance by maintaining data integrity. Healthcare uses it to ensure system reliability for critical patient data applications. Retail benefits from its capacity to handle seasonal traffic spikes effectively.

Sysdig

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

SAP Concur, Goldman Sachs, Worldpay by FIS, Cisco, Experian, Home Office, Societe Generale, Sunrun. More here: https://sysdig.com/customers/

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, SolarWinds, Datadog and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.