Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs OneTouch AT Network Assistant comparison

Auvik and NetAlly are both solutions in the Network Troubleshooting category. Auvik is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while NetAlly is ranked #15. Auvik holds a 4.9% mindshare in NT, compared to NetAlly’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetAlly users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 216 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,261 Views
1,826 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Read 6 OneTouch AT Network Assistant reviews

865 Views
865 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 11, 2024

OneTouch AT Network Assistant and Auvik aid network management through distinct approaches. Auvik is seen as superior in features due to real-time monitoring and automation, while OneTouch AT is favored for affordability and support quality.

Features: Users value OneTouch AT’s comprehensive diagnostic tools, efficient troubleshooting capabilities, and quick resolution features. Auvik stands out with automated network mapping, sophisticated monitoring, and extensive alerting capabilities. Auvik's advanced automation sets it apart from OneTouch AT’s simpler toolset.

Room for Improvement: OneTouch AT needs more advanced monitoring features, better integration with other tools, and enhancements in functionality. Auvik users want improved scalability, interface simplifications, and refined scalability and simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OneTouch AT offers a straightforward setup process and robust customer service. Auvik is praised for quick cloud deployment and user support but has a steeper learning curve due to its rich feature set.

Pricing and ROI: OneTouch AT is commended for lower initial setup costs and quick ROI with its cost-effective tools. Auvik, although more expensive, is deemed worth the investment for its advanced feature set and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

216

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

15th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Troubleshooting category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 4.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneTouch AT Network Assistant is 4.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Troubleshooting Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	4.9%
OneTouch AT Network Assistant	4.5%
Other	90.6%

Network Troubleshooting

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

JamesStout

IT Director at JVS Consulting

It's a simple entry-level tool that's easy to set up, but it has some limitations on speed and IP targets

OneTouch is an entry-level testing tool that's coming to the end of its life, I believe, so it has limitations. For example, it can only test up to 1 gig of network speed. It would be helpful if they increased that to 10 gigs. It is also limited in the number of IP targets you can test. If you want to test how many hops or different sites, you should be able to hit a test button and say, "Right then, test these 20 IP addresses to see if I can reach them." It only does up to 10. Most of NetAlly's other devices, like the G2, can do unlimited addresses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Automatic network mapping, alerting functionalities, and TrafficInsights are valuable."

"It saved us a significant amount of time by bringing everything under one roof."

"The fact that it provides a single, integrated platform for our organization is important as well. Having 50 different accounts to log into would make things difficult at times."

"The most valuable features are the traffic analysis and the network mapping."

"The most valuable feature of Auvik is the comprehensive network management it provides."

"Auvik stands out for its ability to combine network and per-port traffic inspection with log aggregation and data flow analysis in a single platform."

"The topology map is good. It shows each device and whether it has a safe connection, how long it has been connected, and its activities. That's really helpful. Knowing the map helps our efficiency."

"Auvik's auto-detection feature is something I haven't seen in other monitoring systems. We can keep track of our internal device tables to map the devices on the network. The diagram saves us a lot of time. Usually, our new customers don't provide much information about their networks, so we need to spend a lot of time logging into every single device, going into the CDP and LLDP, making nodes, building diagrams, and adding more information. Auvik does it instantaneously."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"Fluke’s not cheap, but you get what you pay for."

"For me, it's easy to use, it always gives me accurate information, it's never crashed or had issues, and the way it's designed lets you pull the module off and put a different type of module on to do other stuff."

"Fluke makes a good product that is rather unique in the marketplace, in my opinion."

"The training features are very valuable for me."

"OneTouch is easy to set up; you just plug it in, enter your details, and off you go, and it only takes a few minutes as long as you've got Link-Live access or network access."

Cons

"The deployment could be better. It's something that we've done recently. Auvik uses something called a collector, and I added a collector to our main site. I only added it to the main site, but when it came to adding additional sites because this was in the testing phase, I had to reconfigure that collector. It wasn't overly clear about how to do that and how to share. They call it sharing a collector. I had to mess around a bit to reconfigure that collector and add some new sites."

"Auvik could include more customization options and the ability to efficiently manage additional features like printer monitoring."

"The deployment of the probe onto a particular device could be improved. That usually requires one of our level-two people to step in from the help desk team. It would be much better if it were a click-and-go deployment. What I would like to see in particular is the ability to download an MSI builder for a probe for a particular building. We would simply double-click and install it onto the machine and have it work. Having to roll through with the entire API key is a little time-consuming."

"It sometimes lags, especially in larger deployments."

"Something else I would like to see would be additional vendors for the hardware life cycle. Right now, they mainly focus on Cisco stuff, which is fine, but not every customer we have uses Cisco."

"I don't like how Auvik handles their multi-site and site terminology compared to other tools."

"I require the monitoring of Linux devices and it doesn't support them."

"Navigating around the map on more complex networks is pretty painful if you're showing endpoints. I know there are filters to knock it down, but sometimes that's not enough. It handles like 'early-90s Java.'"

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"The dashboard is one area with room for improvement."

"With my Fluke OneTouch, I did encounter stability issues."

"There is no scalability for OneTouch. If you want to do other things with it, you can't."

"I think they're a little steep on the pricing side, but you take what you get."

"It is also limited in the number of IP targets you can test. If you want to test how many hops or different sites, you should be able to hit a test button and say, "Right then, test these 20 IP addresses to see if I can reach them." It only does up to 10. Most of NetAlly's other devices, like the G2, can do unlimited addresses."

"The RJ45 jack on top of the Linkrunner has not been able to handle the constant usage at my last location and current employer."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Auvik's pricing is very competitive compared to other network management solutions."

"Auvik is a cost-efficient solution for the applications we use it for."

"The initial offer was high, but I was able to negotiate it down."

"It can get expensive quickly if we monitor a lot of devices, which is unfortunate because we have a lot of devices to monitor."

"Auvik Network Management is moderately priced."

"It is a little more on the expensive side, but I feel that it is a premium product. It is good."

"I find Auvik's pricing to be a good value for the features offered."

"I'm not on the procurement side, but I understand that the license is based on devices, not sensors. If you have 10 switches and one firewall, you count per device. You'll have 100 devices if there are 10 sites with the same setup. I think it's a lot more expensive to monitor 100 sensors in PRTG."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Troubleshooting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	155
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is average. The cost is typically higher for these kinds of tools, so it is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

AirCheck G3 vs OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Compared 18% of the time

LinkRunner vs OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Compared 18% of the time

AirMagnet Survey PRO vs OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Compared 15% of the time

NetAlly EtherScope nXG vs OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Compared 11% of the time

Wireshark vs OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Compared 8% of the time

More OneTouch AT Network Assistant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

August 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

August 2026

Download OneTouch AT Network Assistant product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

OneTouch AT Network Assistant offers a comprehensive approach to troubleshooting and diagnosing network issues effectively, providing enhanced visibility and fast problem-solving capabilities for IT professionals.

Designed for IT teams, OneTouch AT Network Assistant provides detailed insights into network infrastructure, assisting with quick identification of network issues. Its portable design allows on-the-spot testing and analysis, reducing downtime and increasing productivity. The tool enables efficient analysis of network services, application performance, and connectivity faults, streamlining network maintenance and management tasks.

What are the key features of OneTouch AT Network Assistant?

AutoTest Profiles: Customize tests for specific networks to improve troubleshooting accuracy.
Path Analysis: Visualize the path data takes, identifying bottlenecks and points of failure quickly.
Wired and Wireless Connect: Simultaneously troubleshoot both types of connections to enhance reliability.
Cloud Data Service: Store test results for future analysis and better decision-making.

What benefits or ROI should you look for?

Time Savings: Rapid identification and resolution of network issues minimize downtime.
Increased Efficiency: Automated profiling reduces the need for manual configuration.
Cost Reduction: Prevents costly network failures through proactive diagnostics.
Skill Development: Empowers IT staff with a user-friendly tool, enhancing confidence and capability.

In industries such as healthcare, finance, and telecommunications, OneTouch AT Network Assistant is implemented to maintain network integrity and ensure seamless operations. It is particularly valued in environments with complex network topologies requiring robust yet straightforward analysis tools.

NetAlly

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Disney, Carnival Cruise Line, Solarity Credit Union, Del Monte Foods, Lung Bioengineering, Peterbilt Motors Company,Port Angeles School District, Philips Healthcare, Denver University

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant

August 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant report.

See our list of best Network Troubleshooting vendors.

We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.