Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management comparison

Auvik and BMC Helix are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Auvik is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while BMC Helix is ranked #45. Auvik holds a 1.9% mindshare in CMS, compared to BMC Helix’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of BMC Helix users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 208 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

16,097 Views
6,278 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

1,787 Views
643 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and Auvik Network Management compete in enterprise cloud and network management. Auvik often leads due to superior network management capabilities.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management provides cloud provisioning, governance, and automation tools, ideal for managing cloud resources. Auvik Network Management excels with real-time network visibility, monitoring, and troubleshooting, essential for network health maintenance.

Room for Improvement: BMC could enhance its network management features, while Auvik should extend its cloud management capabilities. BMC's deployment complexity and Auvik's room for improved training are additional areas to explore.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Auvik's cloud-based model allows quick setup, with dedicated support for installation, making it more user-friendly. BMC requires more time with on-premise and cloud configurations, making its setup more complex.

Pricing and ROI: BMC's comprehensive features come with higher initial costs, promising long-term ROI. Auvik offers a more cost-effective solution with faster ROI due to lower initial costs and efficient management features. Auvik's cost-benefit balance is more favorable for network management.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (2nd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (42nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.9%
BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management	0.6%
Other	97.5%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Wahaj Memon

System Engineer Tier 4

Real-time alerting enhances network monitoring, but interface and network mapping need improvement

The interface is good yet could be improved. There are many elements that could be changed in the interface itself. There should be some sort of chart or alerting within the dashboard. In the overview section, these features are currently absent. When you get an alert, you must go to notifications, then within the device to identify the issue. It would be beneficial if everything was visible immediately upon logging in to the overview, such as machine performance and other metrics. Regarding the network map and visibility, there are some issues. Many people have mentioned that the network map needs improvement, especially when handling numerous items. Currently, I have everything in place: printers, monitors, laptops, switches, and access points. However, I have three switches showing outside of the loop without explanation. This issue is persistent, not occasional. These switches appear disconnected in the corner, even though they are connected and online according to other platforms. The presentation aspect needs significant improvement. We have government-related clients, and taking a screenshot of the current network mapping to send to them appears unprofessional. Although Auvik Network Management (ANM) provides network mapping, I still need to create my own network diagram to make it presentable for clients.

Read full review

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the fact that it's easy to set up and learn our network. I've used some other systems where it takes a lot of time and effort to manage the monitoring system, so you get what you put into it. The nice thing about Auvik is that you put the credentials in, put the agent on the network, and it just does its thing. It sets up alerts that you would most likely turn on anyway without even having to do it. If you add another new device to the network, it detects it and sets alerts up for that device. With the other systems that I've used, I had to manually add those devices in and manually set the alerts for new devices. I like that it's an almost set-it-and-forget-it sort of system."

"Interestingly, Auvik can manage hardware life cycles. You can see which devices are reaching the end of their lives. It does a built-in audit, but the solution's strength is automated discovery. Auvik does this really well."

"The best features are the alerting and monitoring."

"Auvik Network Management (ANM) does help me decrease my mean time to resolution in significant ways."

"The automation of alerts and ticketing has saved us about 30% to 40% of our time."

"Most importantly, I would say the best thing it did was just provide alerts when something goes down."

"It shows all my devices and it shows everything that is possibly connected to the network... It gives me how many devices or switches are connected, and what is connected to each switch, including how many printers are on it."

"The first feature that I appreciate is the topology drawing in real time. If our NOC wants to troubleshoot, they can go to the topology map and see that this access point is connected to that switch via that specific port. And when something changes in the topology, it's dynamically updated."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"Allowing systems to be provisioned in a wide range of environments, such as Azure, AWS, or on-premise, reduces the level of training required as well as creates consistency across the board."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Total build time has been reduced from four weeks to one week, then later to 24 hours."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management pros

Cons

"I don't think Auvik's pricing should be based on device, which it is right now."

"There have been times when our SNMP community strings were incorrect or weren't updated for whatever reason, and Auvik kept trying to scan them. Changing it was a pain, and there wasn't a way to extract that from Auvik. I understand there are valid security reasons why we wouldn't want to do that sometimes. In those situations, we had to recreate those community strings and reapply them to various devices."

"We have government-related clients, and taking a screenshot of the current network mapping to send to them appears unprofessional."

"The map would be the first thing I would like to see improved because sometimes the maps get really odd-looking and the automated placement of things on the map, devices on the map is sometimes not right."

"The network map can become quite cramped if there are too many devices connected to one access port at the same time."

"It's not the most intuitive dashboard."

"I'd like better integration with Meraki and a history feature for network diagrams. If a device fails on Saturday, we can't find it by Monday. A history or PDF export of diagrams would be great to see how devices should be connected."

"Auvik's network map along with its dashboard gives a real-time picture of our network. However, if a device is unreachable, there is no indicator for that, at least from what I have seen. If it is offline, there is an indicator for that, but if it is unreachable, there is no indicator."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"It was complex as it does not include a good, extensive feasibility and compatibility guide."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"Going to BMC for PS is not at all recommended from my experience."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have any insight into the cost, as another department handles that."

"They are way too lenient in their pricing. To put that simply, I can have an entire network being monitored and it will cost nothing, as long as I'm not monitoring the firewall or the switches."

"I believe that our bill is somewhere around the $600 range per month. We're monitoring about 63 machines. Most of them are servers. So, $10 to monitor it for an entire month is amazing. You couldn't get somebody in India for that cheap."

"It's great for small businesses, but when you start reviewing the pricing model, depending on how many devices, and what sub-devices you decide to pull in, it can get tricky as far as the pricing goes."

"Auvik's pricing is generally reasonable."

"Its licensing is very fair. The devices that stand to gain the most benefit from this product are the ones that are billed. In the case of routers, switches, and firewalls, I won't necessarily have the ability to put a management agent on them to gather errors and activity logs. This type of solution is a requirement for me to properly monitor and manage these devices. The devices that aren't being billed are workstation servers, etc. For those devices, I can put agents on them to monitor their health. It has a fair billing structure."

"Auvik Network Management is moderately priced."

"What is good about Auvik is that it is a monthly spend versus a CapEx."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

14%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	146
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	23

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) is not costly, but pricing is based on how many licenses are taken, and that can be improved.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

One improvement that would be really beneficial for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is the ability to get alerts sent to me via text. Right now, the only alerts I can get are via email. Receiving al...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

My main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is managing our overall network and being able to have insight into all of the devices, switches, servers, firewalls, and access points on the ne...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 6% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Multicloud Manager vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 4% of the time

Virtana Platform vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 4% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

May 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

May 2026

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

BMC CLM

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management provides an efficient cloud management platform designed to streamline the deployment and administration of cloud services, catering to enterprises seeking enhanced control and flexibility in their IT environments.

Specifically crafted for cloud environments, BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management enables users to automate the provisioning of cloud services and resources. It enhances operational efficiency by orchestrating complex workflows that are time-consuming while reducing errors and inconsistencies. Organizations can achieve higher agility and scalability, adapting swiftly to changing demands. With its robust policy-driven framework, it ensures compliance and governance are maintained throughout the cloud lifecycle.

What are the most important features?

Automated Provisioning: Reduces manual intervention and accelerates service delivery.
Self-Service Portal: Empowers users to request and manage resources independently.
Compliance Management: Ensures adherence to set policies and standards.
Multi-Cloud Support: Facilitates seamless operations across different cloud environments.

What benefits or ROI should be evaluated?

Cost Optimization: Efficiently utilize resources to minimize expenses.
Scalability: Easily expand infrastructure to meet growing demands.
Improved Time-to-Market: Quickly launch and manage cloud services.
Enhanced Security: Maintain robust security protocols within cloud landscapes.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is actively implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where agile IT services are crucial. For instance, in healthcare, it facilitates rapid deployment of critical applications, ensuring that patient services are uninterrupted while maintaining strict compliance with industry regulations. In finance, it ensures the rapid scaling of resources in response to market fluctuations, maintaining performance and compliance.

BMC Helix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

April 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.