We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and UiPath Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."
"It scales very well. We can add jobs and remove jobs. We do not have problems maintaining the product across multiple environments and multiple servers."
"The initial setup is easy."
"AutoSys Workload Automation is a stable solution."
"It allows you to automate tasks, and reduce headcount, prevent errors, self-heal."
"The customized views that each individual can create, and views that can be made free-form, makes this very popular with the programmers."
"The scheduling feature allows us to know when jobs are going to run and makes sure they run in the order needed."
"We get better reports than we use to have."
"UiPath Orchestrator is a stable solution."
"Assets and logs are valuable."
"UiPath Orchestration works effectively in deploying, scheduling, and running automated bots across different environments."
"From what I have seen, it is a reliable tool."
"One standout feature I like in UiPath Orchestrator is the scheduling capability."
"The product helps to monitor our automation process and keep statistics. When not dealing with just one process, we utilize the business process. From there, we obtain the necessary answers, and the robot completes the process accordingly. We keep on improving our processes to become more effective. Hence, we start with a small process."
"The product has been pretty amazing at deploying, scheduling, and running automated bots."
"I like UiPath Orchestrator's screen capture feature."
"I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days."
"Needs better documentation with fully explained examples for some of the job types."
"We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects."
"An area for improvement in AutoSys Workload Automation is that it lacks advanced features or advanced built-in functionalities found in competitors, for example, an advanced workflow feature. Even the handling or notification from AutoSys Workload Automation isn't the best in the industry. Other products have very good workflow-related functionalities such as ActiveBatch that's missing in AutoSys Workload Automation, so I wish the tool had those features."
"In terms of what should be in the next release, I want integration and AI and so on. I'd like easy reporting where you can compare information, for example, "that job normally takes three minutes and last time it took six minutes or 10 minutes." Then you can get the information to the engineer of which job is taking more time than normal - understanding strange behavior compared to the baseline."
"Pricing model for distributed should have an Enterprise option."
"The vendor should provide free certification to their partners."
"UiPath Orchestrator should improve its UI and make it more user-friendly."
"We encounter errors while configuring and integrating the product with other vendors."
"UiPath Orchestrator is sometimes a bit clunky, and a few things don't work in the tool as they should."
"The code management for the Studio could be improved."
"The product must provide process mining features."
"The solution’s licensing cost is high and could be improved."
"The vision libraries that the tool provides, along with the visualization part, are areas with shortcomings in the solution where improvements are required."
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while UiPath Orchestrator is ranked 11th in Workload Automation with 21 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while UiPath Orchestrator is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Orchestrator writes "A user-friendly and reliable tool that is easy to implement". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas UiPath Orchestrator is most compared with . See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
