AutoSys Workload Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator comparison

Broadcom and UiPath are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8, while UiPath is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. Broadcom holds a 11.7% mindshare in WA, compared to UiPath’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

AutoSys Workload Automation

Read 82 AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

6,375 Views
2,441 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

UiPath Orchestrator

Read 34 UiPath Orchestrator reviews

373 Views
148 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

AutoSys Workload Automation

UiPath Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

AutoSys Workload Automation and UiPath Orchestrator cater to automation needs in workload automation and robotic process automation, respectively. AutoSys Workload Automation has the upper hand in pricing and support, while UiPath Orchestrator offers superior features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: AutoSys Workload Automation provides robust job scheduling, workload optimization, and comprehensive monitoring. It ensures reliability in managing complex environments. UiPath Orchestrator is known for its scalability, advanced analytics, and extensive integration options, which offer more versatility in automation processes.

Room for Improvement: AutoSys Workload Automation could enhance its adaptability and support for hybrid cloud environments. Increasing its user interface intuitiveness and simplifying integrations with emerging technologies can boost its competitiveness. UiPath Orchestrator can expand its feature set to optimize for large-scale deployments, improve its cost-efficiency, and refine its machine learning capabilities for better automation consistency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AutoSys Workload Automation focuses on a stable, traditional on-premise deployment model, requiring technical expertise for customer service. UiPath Orchestrator offers flexible deployment options, including cloud and hybrid models, with proactive and accessible support, ensuring a faster and user-friendly deployment experience.

Pricing and ROI: AutoSys Workload Automation provides a straightforward pricing structure that aligns with solid ROI in managing enterprise-level workloads. UiPath Orchestrator, despite a higher initial cost, delivers perceived greater ROI through enhanced capabilities and rapid deployment benefits, delivering value through its feature-rich platform.

To learn more, read our detailed AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AutoSys Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Orchestrator

Ranking in Workload Automation

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation is 11.7%, down from 17.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Orchestrator is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

Bantu Kumar

Senior Technical Director at Globant

Improves operational efficiency through its centralized dashboard and asset management

There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities. Permissions, roles, and queues sometimes result in conflicts, requiring deeper understanding. I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive, and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We don't have to manually run things anymore. We can have the work that a team of 50 people would do, all inside of one platform."

"The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is user-friendliness. If someone has some knowledge of the tool they can use it."

"The flexibility in solving job scheduling challenges allows us to successfully integrate an acquired business’ fiscal close with our own, even though there is a lot of variance as to when they run in the calendar month."

"We get better reports than we use to have."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs."

"To me, what's most valuable in AutoSys Workload Automation is its robustness and quickness. The tool can trigger jobs within a few milliseconds, and it can handle large volumes of jobs."

"The benefits I have seen from AutoSys Workload Automation are significant; I would say it is about ease of administration."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

"The reporting features are good."

"The monitoring feature stands out as the single most indispensable aspect of UiPath Orchestrator for our automation processes."

"It allows for the segregation of users, ensuring each user has access to specific environments based on their roles."

"I also create user and machine templates and do other work in Orchestrator."

"One standout feature I like in UiPath Orchestrator is the scheduling capability."

"The features of UiPath Orchestrator that I find to be the most useful for automation processes are scheduling, queue management, and asset management."

"I like UiPath Orchestrator's screen capture feature."

"UiPath Orchestration works effectively in deploying, scheduling, and running automated bots across different environments."

More UiPath Orchestrator pros

Cons

"CA installation processes are never anything but complex."

"Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days."

"I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us."

"There is a slow response time by tech support. Unless, you say it's severity level one. That will give you a two hour timing window for them to call you. It doesn't really happen exactly in two hours, but they try."

"We had a few issues, however, the issues were more on the infrastructure rather than with the application itself."

"I am looking forward to more of their dashboard features. I think it would be very valuable for us to have dashboard features that could be delivered to our customers in the form of a URL, and they could refresh that URL whenever they wanted to get up to date performance metrics out of our systems."

"They could do better supporting it. They have too many of the same type of products, so sometimes it doesn't get as much attention as it should."

"Autosys is still lagging behind some competitive products from a functionality perspective."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

"It takes us time to understand the process before we can publish it. Its pricing needs to be lower, and there needs to be a centralized dashboard."

"It is challenging to accurately define text within images for the product."

"The solution's pricing can be more competitive. Apache is one of the most expensive alternatives in the market. The integration with reporting tools and classic solutions is essential. Having BI integration, Salesforce integration, and robust monitoring and reporting capabilities would enhance the product."

"Clarity on integrating SQL databases and server configurations would improve implementation processes."

"UiPath basic support has some limitations, however, the premium support levels provide more convenient coverage & response times."

"The product could improve by migrating more functionalities from the cloud to the on-premises version sooner."

"The solution must provide more AI capabilities."

"There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities."

More UiPath Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."

"The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."

"The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."

"I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."

"People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."

"We paid to use the solution monthly."

"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."

"I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"The pricing seems reasonable based on project requirements."

"The product is quite expensive."

"The tool's licensing cost is high. I rate the tool an eight or nine on a scale from one to ten, where ten means expensive."

"Larger organizations may benefit from more favorable pricing, as the costs can be distributed across more licenses."

"The products are available for free on the cloud, and even it is the same to a certain extent for the on-premises version. The pricing is included as a part of the license of the robot from UiPath."

"The product is expensive."

More UiPath Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

48%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?

The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

The solution is costly. The pricing is based on the number of users, which for me, translates to approximately $120,000 to $130,000 for a license period of two to three years.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Orchestrator?

Using UiPath Orchestrator, we can deploy tasks across different environments, including virtual machines, for both attended and unattended processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Orchestrator?

The pricing of UiPath Orchestrator is a bit high. However, we can compete with that, though if they decrease the prices, it would lead to better market penetration.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Orchestrator?

I would like to see high availability over two sites, with a main site and a disaster recovery working as an active-active solution, which is not currently supported.

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 33% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

Automic Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 59% of the time

Control-M vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 41% of the time

More UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

June 2025

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Orchestrator

May 2025

Download UiPath Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

No data available

Overview

AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.

Organizations leverage AutoSys Workload Automation for running extensive workloads day and night, particularly important for banks, insurance clients, and enterprises needing robust job scheduling and file transfer processes. It is crucial for managing cross-functional dependencies with 24/7 automated triggers, batch processing, and centralized business process control, ensuring seamless operations across various servers and environments.

What are the most important features?

Easy Configuration: Simplifies initial setup and updates.
SAP Integration: Seamlessly integrates with SAP environments.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires less frequent updates and interventions.
Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing business needs.
Speed and Stability: Ensures high performance and reliable operations.
User-friendly Interface: Enhances user experience and efficiency.
Real-time Batch Processing View: Provides instant insights into batch jobs.
Compatibility: Works well with various software systems.
Robustness: Delivers consistent, reliable performance.
Easy Setup: Simplifies deployment process.
File Transfer Protocol: Facilitates smooth and secure file transfers.
File Watcher: Monitors and manages file changes effectively.
Performance and Upgrades: Ensures improved performance and simplified upgrades.

What are the benefits or ROI items to consider?

Improved Efficiencies: Reduces manual intervention and automates repetitive tasks.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource usage and reduces operational costs.
Enhanced Reliability: Decreases downtime with robust performance.
Better Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems.
24/7 Operations: Ensures uninterrupted business processes.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to growing business needs.
Advanced Scheduling: Provides comprehensive job scheduling options.

AutoSys Workload Automation is widely implemented in banking for day and night operations, insurance client environments for reliable support, and enterprises for automated file transfers and robust job scheduling. Organizations centralize business processes and manage cross-functional dependencies effectively with its 24/7 automated triggers, supporting diverse industry needs through scalable and reliable performance.

Broadcom

UiPath Orchestrator automates website processes, manages supply chains, handles log-ins, and processes invoices efficiently. It's a comprehensive tool for generating reports, managing RPA workflows, scheduling robots, and ensuring task accuracy, making it indispensable for organizations aiming to optimize automation.

UiPath Orchestrator stands out for its user-friendly interface, centralized data collection, and robust security measures. Its intuitive design, combined with a comprehensive view of bot activity, makes it highly appreciated among users. With asset encryption, AI-integrated functionalities, and role-based access control, organizations find it reduces the need for extensive technical knowledge, thereby enhancing automation efficiency. It also excels in asset and queue management, logging capabilities, and scheduling functions, contributing significantly to streamlined operational processes.

What are the most important features of UiPath Orchestrator?

Centralized data collection: Provides a unified view of all automation activities
Robust security measures: Includes asset encryption and role-based access control
Scheduling functions: Allows efficient planning and execution of automated tasks
Asset and queue management: Enhances organization in handling automation assets
Logging capabilities: Tracks activities for better oversight and troubleshooting
AI-integrated functionalities: Improves accuracy and efficiency in automation

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating UiPath Orchestrator?

Market visibility: Increased exposure and promotional activities
Code management: Improved management capabilities for Studio
Support response: Faster and more efficient support services
Credential vault: Enhanced flexibility in handling transactional items
AI capabilities: Advanced features at competitive pricing
Documentation: Clearer guidelines for transitioning setups
Integration: Better integration with reporting tools and comprehensive dashboards
Licensing: Streamlined processes for managing licenses
Monitoring: Centralized triggers for better process monitoring

UiPath Orchestrator sees wide application across industries such as manufacturing, finance, and healthcare. In manufacturing, it streamlines supply chain processes and automates inventory management. Finance companies use it for processing invoices and managing compliance, while the healthcare sector benefits from automating patient data handling and optimizing appointment scheduling. Each industry leverages the platform\'s extensive capabilities to enhance operational efficiency and accuracy.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

June 2025

Free Report: AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.