AutoSys Workload Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator comparison

Broadcom and UiPath are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while UiPath is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1. Broadcom holds a 9.9% mindshare in WA, compared to UiPath’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

AutoSys Workload Automation

Read 84 AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

6,325 Views
5,566 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

UiPath Orchestrator

Read 34 UiPath Orchestrator reviews

551 Views
540 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

AutoSys Workload Automation

UiPath Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

AutoSys Workload Automation and UiPath Orchestrator compete in the automation solutions category. AutoSys is preferred for its scheduling capabilities, while UiPath is superior due to its flexibility and adaptability.

Features: AutoSys Workload Automation offers robust job scheduling, complex workflow support, and scalability. UiPath Orchestrator excels in robotic process automation, real-time client-side interaction, and comprehensive monitoring tools.

Room for Improvement: AutoSys could enhance its integration capabilities and simplify its user interface for broader usability. Additionally, improving initial setup processes and reducing reliance on internal IT could add value. UiPath Orchestrator could expand its feature sets to support more niche automation needs. Enhancing predictive analytics and integrating more deeply with non-ERP applications would improve versatility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UiPath Orchestrator offers a cloud-based deployment model with quick setup and exceptional support. In contrast, AutoSys Workload Automation requires more complex on-premise installation, needing significant internal IT support.

Pricing and ROI: AutoSys often incurs higher initial costs due to complex configurations, leading to slower ROI when not heavily reliant on job scheduling. UiPath, with flexible pricing and quicker implementation, provides a faster ROI, ideal for businesses seeking rapid automation scaling.

To learn more, read our detailed AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AutoSys Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Orchestrator

Ranking in Workload Automation

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation is 9.9%, down from 16.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Orchestrator is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AutoSys Workload Automation	9.9%
UiPath Orchestrator	1.0%
Other	89.1%

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

Bantu Kumar

Senior Technical Director at Globant

Improves operational efficiency through its centralized dashboard and asset management

There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities. Permissions, roles, and queues sometimes result in conflicts, requiring deeper understanding. I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive, and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Integration with multiple services and applications across the enterprise."

"We use technical support all the time. We would be lost without them. They're fantastic. Really good job. We're able to reach the right person to help us out right away."

"The features that I have found most valuable with AutoSys are that it is scalable, easy to use, fast, and always available. That's very important because if it's not steady then it's a real problem. So, at this point, we are satisfied with it."

"The scheduling feature allows us to know when jobs are going to run and makes sure they run in the order needed."

"Automation of patch process."

"It is stable, it works, and it does what it is supposed to."

"AutoSys Workload Automation is scalable."

"We get better reports than we use to have."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

"UiPath has one of the strongest community setups."

"The most beneficial feature is the queue system, which allows robots to process a large volume of data simultaneously."

"The logs are the best feature of the solution."

"UiPath Orchestrator is considered the brain of the system."

"I like UiPath Orchestrator's screen capture feature."

"From my perspective, the main feature of UiPath Orchestrator is their good library of ready-made processes, which is very time-saving."

"From what I have seen, it is a reliable tool."

"The features of UiPath Orchestrator that I find to be the most useful for automation processes are scheduling, queue management, and asset management."

More UiPath Orchestrator pros

Cons

"We had a few issues, however, the issues were more on the infrastructure rather than with the application itself."

"Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier."

"I am looking forward to more of their dashboard features. I think it would be very valuable for us to have dashboard features that could be delivered to our customers in the form of a URL, and they could refresh that URL whenever they wanted to get up to date performance metrics out of our systems."

"It would be helpful to be able to monitor and manage workload windows so we could minimize downstream applications. This would allow us easier access to the applications."

"The solution could improve by having support for container environments."

"We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects."

"The scalability is poor because I cannot use it for all automation solutions."

"The graphical interface can be improved."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

"I am interested in seeing more features like document understanding and AI integration."

"It takes us time to understand the process before we can publish it. Its pricing needs to be lower, and there needs to be a centralized dashboard."

"UiPath Orchestrator needs to focus on dashboards."

"One of the significant challenges we've encountered with UiPath Orchestrator is the frequent and rapid changes in the tool's interface and functionality."

"UiPath Orchestrator should improve its UI and make it more user-friendly."

"In my opinion, some improvements could be made in the UiPath Orchestrator. For example, it's not so simple to see all the time triggers that we have. We need to check each folder and see all the triggers to see what kind of robot will run. We do not have all the triggers in one place, showing the time they will run and for which process in each folder. Another thing is that the tool for monitoring processes does not show the relation between the process and the machines running them. We can check which machine is available or not because it is running a process, but we cannot see the process and the machine running it in one view."

"I am interested in seeing more features like document understanding and AI integration."

"The product must provide process mining features."

More UiPath Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."

"I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."

"I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."

"It is overpriced."

"People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."

"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."

"The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."

"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive, and the associated licenses add to the expenses, initially making deploying new processes costly."

"The solution is very expensive. Compared to Microsoft, another tool that is much cheaper than the tool, it does not have the same features that UiPath Orchestrator has. The most valuable feature in my platform is the queue items in UiPath Orchestrator to evaluate the products using this feature."

"The product’s pricing is a little higher than reasonable."

"UiPath Orchestrator's price is reasonable. We pay around 40k USD. Its licensing costs are yearly."

"The product is expensive."

"The products are available for free on the cloud, and even it is the same to a certain extent for the on-premises version. The pricing is included as a part of the license of the robot from UiPath."

"The pricing seems reasonable based on project requirements."

"The product is quite expensive."

More UiPath Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

46%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	77

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?

The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

It is reasonably priced compared to the market.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Orchestrator?

Using UiPath Orchestrator, we can deploy tasks across different environments, including virtual machines, for both attended and unattended processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Orchestrator?

Regarding licensing costs and setup costs, the pricing is on the higher side compared to other RPA solutions that are entering the market, which are much cheaper, and sometimes we cannot retain cus...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Orchestrator?

In future updates of UiPath Orchestrator, I would want to see something that allows typing basic details of the workflow, which can then be used to design a text message workflow. As of now, almost...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 31% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

Automic Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 50% of the time

Control-M vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 32% of the time

VMware Aria Automation Orchestrator vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 18% of the time

More UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

October 2025

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Orchestrator

September 2025

Download UiPath Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

No data available

Overview

AutoSys Workload Automation efficiently manages complex workloads across platforms, offering high availability and seamless platform integration. Its reliability and scalability are valued for enterprise-level automation, enhancing job management and reducing manual effort with robust scheduling and advanced security.

AutoSys Workload Automation is known for its user-friendly capabilities, effectively handling cross-platform job scheduling with mainframe integration. It supports high availability, ensuring reliable performance for critical operations. Despite enhancements needed in its GUI and integration capabilities, AutoSys remains effective for batch processing, file transfers, ETL, and managing dependencies across servers and applications. Improvements are suggested for deployment complexity and monitoring features. More effective licensing and scalability solutions, along with modern subscription models and cloud integration, could address cost and automation barriers.

What are AutoSys Workload Automation's key features?

Robust Scheduling: Automates job scheduling across multiple platforms efficiently.
Advanced Security: Ensures secure management of workloads.
High Availability: Maintains performance during critical operations.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly integrates with diverse systems.
Scalability: Supports growing enterprise demands.

What benefits should users expect from AutoSys Workload Automation?

Reduced Manual Effort: Minimizes manual task management.
Enhanced Job Management: Improves oversight and control over job processes.
Flexibility in Scheduling: Offers adaptable scheduling and monitoring options.
Reliability: Consistent job execution without failures.
Security: Protects enterprise-level operations.

In industries like banking, insurance, and retail, AutoSys Workload Automation facilitates 24/7 automated job execution, ensuring smooth task automation. It allows companies to manage enterprise workloads effectively, catering to batch processing, file transfers, and handling job dependencies in a consistent manner.

Broadcom

UiPath Orchestrator offers a centralized platform for managing robotic process automation tasks, featuring advanced scheduling, integration capabilities, and robust monitoring to enhance workflow efficiency across environments.

UiPath Orchestrator provides a comprehensive suite of tools for automating workflows, centralizing data management, and ensuring security compliance. Known for its ease of use, it helps businesses schedule robots, handle reports, and monitor logs centrally. It facilitates task deployment across diverse environments, simplifies document understanding, process automation, and provides insights into bot activities. While installation and complexity are areas for improvement, Orchestrator remains integral in sectors like finance, telecom, and healthcare.

What features does UiPath Orchestrator provide?

User-Friendly Interface: Easier navigation and interaction for users.
Advanced Scheduling: Enables precise coordination of automation tasks.
Centralized Data Management: Streamlines data oversight and reporting.
Robust Monitoring: Effective tracking of automated processes.
Asset Management with Encryption: Ensures secure handling of resources.
Efficient Queue System: Manages task sequences and priorities effectively.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex automation tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates seamless connection with multiple applications.
AI-Enhanced Features: Offers advanced automation capabilities.
Flexibility: Supports dynamic deployment across different environments.

Organizations leverage UiPath Orchestrator for automating workflows such as website processes and supply chain management. In industries like finance and healthcare, it is used for provisioning and data entry. It provides a framework to configure machines, create templates, and manage resources, driving efficiency and innovation.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

September 2025

Free Report: AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.