

Automox and Wiz compete in cybersecurity, with Automox leading in ease of deployment and pricing, while Wiz offers comprehensive features for cloud security.
Features: Automox offers automated patch management, cross-platform compatibility, and detailed reporting. Wiz provides advanced threat detection, comprehensive cloud security insights, and intuitive dashboards.
Room for Improvement: Automox could improve in threat detection capabilities, enhancing cloud security integration, and offering more intuitive dashboards. Wiz could streamline its deployment process, enhance its user interface, and provide more flexible pricing options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Automox is known for a straightforward deployment and accessible customer support aiding smooth implementation. Wiz's intricate features require a more sophisticated setup but are supported by comprehensive guidance and quality customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Automox is cost-effective, offering solid ROI with predictable pricing aligning with various budgets. Wiz requires higher upfront investment, justified by its extensive features, appealing to those with focused cloud security needs.
It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers.
Our team used to spend 10 hours per week just to update these things, and now we're doing it automatically.
We have seen ROI from Wiz and we continued to see value in Wiz.
I think we're reaching the point where we'll see a return on investment, and we'll be there by the end of the year.
We estimate a cost reduction of around 35% to 50%, or even more, due to consolidating our security management into one platform.
They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.
They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.
The customer support for Automox is very responsive and proactive.
On a scale from 1 to 10, I would give Wiz's support a 10.
The vendor was readily available to assist us over calls, clarifying both technical aspects and theoretical insights.
If I were to put Wiz support on a scale from one to ten, I would give them a ten.
It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.
Automox is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth.
We have deployed Wiz in three organizations on AWS, each with approximately 70 to 80 accounts, totaling more than 120 accounts.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Our environment quadrupled in size. We didn’t have to make any adjustments or configuration changes; it just accommodated the growth.
It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.
The stability of Wiz has been good, with no downtime, bugs, or glitches.
The services were stable, and we did not experience any downtime.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten.
An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.
I would add that remote support for iOS could be better, and remote support of Linux is also lacking.
It could also leverage AI, which would help in autonomous patch prioritization and risk remediation.
We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately.
One significant area for improvement would be increasing automation. While they excel at identifying issues, we need assistance in minimizing the human hours required for tasks.
Adding AI-driven features could significantly assist developers in addressing vulnerabilities more efficiently, thereby improving deployment times and adherence to deadlines.
Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.
We are paying 250k per year.
In some cases, it has a very aggressive price, so very cheap.
I don’t think there’s anyone else out there offering the same level, scale, or efficiency.
One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching.
It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically.
It has very strong patch automation, particularly in automated OS patching, third-party patching, policy-based rollout, patch scheduling, and vulnerability remediation.
The ability to scan every layer without agents is a huge selling point because we're multi-agent.
The feature leads to minimal false positives and a low volume of alerts, which is highly valuable for our operations.
It's highly customizable, allowing us to manage many custom features effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Wiz | 5.0% |
| Automox | 0.6% |
| Other | 94.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Automox offers automated patch management with cloud-native architecture, cross-platform compatibility, and ease of use. It provides real-time visibility and streamlines operations across Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it ideal for complex IT environments.
Automox empowers organizations with features like Worklets and remote management, enhancing security and efficiency through customizable patching policies, PowerShell script execution, and detailed reporting. It's primarily used for automated patch management, patch remediation, and compliance maintenance across diverse systems, ensuring cybersecurity and reducing vulnerabilities. Enhancements are desired for user access control, policy synchronization, and integration with tools like Tenable. Support for offline patching, rollback features, enhanced reporting, and notification customization are in demand. Improvements in cost effectiveness and multi-group policy applications are also suggested.
What are the key features of Automox?In industry applications, Automox is widely used for managing and updating vast fleets of devices, particularly in sectors requiring stringent cybersecurity measures. It ensures seamless operations through its centralized automation and management capabilities, making it essential for organizations handling extensive IT networks.
Wiz offers cloud security management with key capabilities in visibility, risk prioritization, and comprehensive analysis. It supports multi-cloud environments, ensuring robust integration and streamlining security tasks effectively.
Known for its advanced features like CSPM module, Security Graph, and Threat Intelligence, Wiz enables cloud integration while minimizing false positives. Its agentless deployment and high-risk analysis granularity improve operational efficiency. Users note desires for better reporting, more security features, enhanced integration, notably for APIs and cloud services like Kubernetes. Challenges include dashboard customization limits, remediation automation, scanning frequency, and cost concerns, particularly in Brazil. Users adopt Wiz for tasks including cloud security posture management, vulnerability identification, automated security measures, and integrating security tools, effectively managing security in AWS, Azure, and GCP.
What are the key features of Wiz?Companies in industries with complex cloud architectures, like finance and healthcare, leverage Wiz for its multi-cloud support, managing risks and compliance efficiently. Its integration with container technologies aids sectors reliant on Kubernetes. Retailers benefit from visibility into misconfigurations, ensuring robust customer data protection.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.