AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation and AutoSys Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Microsoft, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product provides efficiency, in terms time, cost, and resources.""The capability to provide visibility to the stakeholders, to management, is the biggest piece that showcases what the solution is about.""It gives us good feedback on visualizations and on how our processes have progressed.""Self-service for developers, because they are able to deploy to development departments on their own, without needing people from operations.""The metrics gathered after deployment, for example, the rate of success versus the rate of failure.""It is an umbrella system that allows us to integrate many different systems into our heterogeneous environment.""Deployment workflow (WF) can be designed this way, so that it is not necessary to provide all applications (systems) artifacts of which an application consists.""The IT process automation is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pros →

"The scheduling feature allows us to know when jobs are going to run and makes sure they run in the order needed.""This solution has made my clients' workplaces a lot less labor-intensive.""It works constantly and is pretty seamless. You do not have to open up many support tickets.""We use technical support all the time. We would be lost without them. They're fantastic. Really good job. We're able to reach the right person to help us out right away.""Automic Automation Engine provides us the ability to map logic using a scripting language.""We don't have to manually run things anymore. We can have the work that a team of 50 people would do, all inside of one platform.""The aggregator reporting utility which tells us our throughput in lag and latency.""​It scales very well. We can add jobs and remove jobs. We do not have problems maintaining the product across multiple environments and multiple servers.​"

More AutoSys Workload Automation Pros →

Cons
"It would be very beneficial for us to see integrations into cloud environments, especially into the Google Cloud environment because we are heading towards cloud.""key thing is support for cloud-based deployment. That is lacking.""There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them.""I would like to see more support for WebSphere.""We hope that we can integrate the new CD Directive into our portfolio, so we can bring the deployment and release management closer together.""There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system.""One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform. There is a little bit of a learning curve in learning how to code some of the workflows in Automic at this time. If widely used languages like Perl and Python were integrated, on top of what's already there, the proprietary language, it would make it easier to on-board new resources.""If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Cons →

"The visibility and control features are somewhat limited.""We are trying to see if we can use this from a cloud perspective with AWS, Azure, and other clouds, but it seems that there is no cloud integration in this product. We would like to see cloud integration. We are very pleased with this solution, but we are moving our application to the cloud, and we found out that it doesn't support any cloud features. So, we are trying to find a replacement.""We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects.""It lacks support and integration with cloud computing platforms.""Ease of implementation for upgrades.""They could do better supporting it. They have too many of the same type of products, so sometimes it doesn't get as much attention as it should.""CA Workload Automation is not part of CA's strategic vision going forward.""Some of the reports are either a bit hard to understand or don’t give you what you might expect to see."

More AutoSys Workload Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."
  • "I can save time and money more quickly."
  • "If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."
  • "Customers often complain about the price."
  • More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Validate how many agents you need beforehand."
  • "CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."
  • "People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."
  • "I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."
  • "It is overpriced."
  • "The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."
  • "The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."
  • "There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."
  • More AutoSys Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is batch processing.
    Ranking
    17th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    388
    Comparisons
    316
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    6th
    out of 49 in Workload Automation
    Views
    9,656
    Comparisons
    7,258
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    420
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform
    CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE
    Learn More
    Overview

    Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar. 

    Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

    AutoSys Workload Automation delivers end-to-end visibility of application workloads and dependencies across platforms, ERP systems, and the cloud. Thanks to event-based triggering, real-time alerting, and dynamic critical path management, business applications are ensured for availability.

    By intelligently and effectively assigning workloads based on real-time information about the available computing resources and service level agreements, AutoSys Workload Automation scales to enterprise demands with ease. The solution permits businesses to swiftly provision and handle workloads in physical, virtualized, and cloud environments.

    The platform helps to reduce the cost and complexity of managing mission-critical business processes, ensuring consistent and reliable service delivery. AutoSys Workload Automation is a job control solution that allows you to manage workloads via a command-line interface (CLI) or graphical user interface (GUI).

    AutoSys Workload Automation Features

    AutoSys Workload Automation has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Multi-platform scheduling: Manage and visualize a process end to end across multiple platforms from a central point of control.
    • Extensive scalability: Provide production scalability without the need for multiple server instances.
    • Extensive app support: Manage workloads for business apps such as PeopleSoft, SAP, and Oracle E-Business. This results in lower operating costs and increased cross-enterprise visibility.
    • Built-in fault tolerance: Robust, lights-out operations with automated recovery that facilitates the availability of business systems by enabling jobs to be completed accurately and on time.
    • Self service: End-users have the ability to request and execute workload processing that is controlled by workload policy and governance processes. This gives businesses more control over their own services.
    • Security and compliance: Better meet regulatory compliance requirements by defining access permissions at any level. If there are problems, you can view what was changed, by whom, and at what time.

    AutoSys Workload Automation Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing AutoSys Workload Automation. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Job scheduling, monitoring, and reporting: Jobs can be scheduled across platforms. When a job enters different production schedule phases, keep track of it and give reports.
    • Create reports that ease regulatory compliance and improve control.
    • Forecasting is used to detect and comprehend the business impact of work within a job stream. You can send notifications for overdue tasks or bypass less critical jobs.
    • Managing resources: The solution assesses the resources that are available and schedules jobs to achieve a defined SLA, enhancing resource utilization.

    Reviews from Real Users

    AutoSys Workload Automation stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its file transfer protocol and its visibility for batch processing. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    One PeerSpot reviewer, an IT consultant at a computer software company, writes, “The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs.

    Another PeerSpot reviewer, a head at an insurance company, notes, “It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good. It also gives us the ability to connect different software processes.”

    Sample Customers
    BET365, Charter Communications, TASC
    Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm36%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Transportation Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm46%
    Insurance Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm46%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Insurance Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise79%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise82%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise84%
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Microsoft, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is ranked 17th in Release Automation while AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is rated 8.0, while AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Automic Continuous Delivery Automation writes "Reduces our time to market considerably with automated and consistent results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, UrbanCode Deploy, Nolio Release Automation and Qentelli, whereas AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.