We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"It was mostly easy to set up the product."
"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."
"The installation process is easy."
"The stability is excellent."
"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."
"The solution's customer service is good."
"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."
"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."
"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."
"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."
"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."
"You cannot include the validation of XPath."
"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."
"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."
"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 12th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 7 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 7th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 18 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Mule ESB.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
