We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Aurea CX Messenger vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea CX Messenger Logo
893 views|476 comparisons
Red Hat AMQ Logo
4,546 views|3,629 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea CX Messenger vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution offers excellent stability.""The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need.""The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros →

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature.""The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched.""The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

More Red Hat AMQ Pros →

Cons
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs""The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.""I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons →

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated.""This product needs better visualization capabilities in general.""There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

More Red Hat AMQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."
  • "This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."
  • More Red Hat AMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part… more »
    Top Answer: 
    For AMQ itself, when we purchased it last year, it was last year that it was offered as a separate product. Right now, technically, what we bought is not available anymore. It's not relevant anymore… more »
    Top Answer: 
    There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    893
    Comparisons
    476
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    495
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    4,546
    Comparisons
    3,629
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    707
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
    Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ
    Learn More
    Aurea
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

    To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

    Offer
    Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
    Learn more about Red Hat AMQ
    Sample Customers
    Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
    E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government8%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea CX Messenger vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 3 reviews while Red Hat AMQ is ranked 7th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 3 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.6, while Red Hat AMQ is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Easy to develop and easy to run". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat AMQ writes "Flexible, cost-effective, good compatibility with the OpenShift platform, effective and timely support". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with IBM MQ, Mule ESB, Apache Kafka, VMware RabbitMQ and ActiveMQ, whereas Red Hat AMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and IBM Event Streams. See our Aurea CX Messenger vs. Red Hat AMQ report.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.