We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Aurea CX Messenger vs OpenESB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea CX Messenger Logo
893 views|476 comparisons
OpenESB Logo
524 views|159 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea CX Messenger vs. OpenESB and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution offers excellent stability.""The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages.""The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros →

"The core is very stable.""OpenESB pushes the organization to clearly define service boundaries and interfaces. So it motives the business and the development teams to clearly define their business services and processes they want to implement. OpenESB supports fine and coarse-grain granularity for the services and supports top-down and bottom-up approaches for the services, processes definition, and composition.""One of the most valuable features is being able to implement business processes while keeping track of the design from BPMN to a BPEL Implementation."

More OpenESB Pros →

Cons
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.""I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included.""Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons →

"Regarding its management, a web console being able to synchronize distributed instances would be great.""The documentation of the product must be improved. It could be tricky to find the right documentation on a topic since the documentation is spread in many places. I advise the new joiner to contact the community to get entry points and additional documentation. Tutorial and Video must be present to take up the product.""The documentation needs to be better."

More OpenESB Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There are two versions. The first is the community version, which is free and contains the last part of the feature, but if you want to get the Enterprise version, you'll have to pay €60,000 which covers support and two instances on production."
  • "The Community Edition is a full product you can use in production, it does not have limitations like other alternatives."
  • More OpenESB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    Views
    893
    Comparisons
    476
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    495
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    524
    Comparisons
    159
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    1,029
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
    Learn More
    Aurea
    Video Not Available
    OpenESB
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

    OpenESB is a Java-based open-source enterprise service bus. It can be used as a platform for both enterprise application integration and service-oriented architecture. OpenESB allows you to integrate legacy systems, external and internal partners and new development in your Business Process.

    Offer
    Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
    Learn more about OpenESB
    Sample Customers
    Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider39%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea CX Messenger vs. OpenESB and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 13th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 3 reviews while OpenESB is ranked 10th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 3 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.6, while OpenESB is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Easy to develop and easy to run". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenESB writes "Supports top-down and bottom-up approaches for the services, processes definition, and composition". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with IBM MQ, Mule ESB, Apache Kafka, VMware RabbitMQ and ActiveMQ, whereas OpenESB is most compared with Mule ESB, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and Red Hat Fuse. See our Aurea CX Messenger vs. OpenESB report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.