"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"The core is very stable."
"OpenESB pushes the organization to clearly define service boundaries and interfaces. So it motives the business and the development teams to clearly define their business services and processes they want to implement. OpenESB supports fine and coarse-grain granularity for the services and supports top-down and bottom-up approaches for the services, processes definition, and composition."
"One of the most valuable features is being able to implement business processes while keeping track of the design from BPMN to a BPEL Implementation."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"Regarding its management, a web console being able to synchronize distributed instances would be great."
"The documentation of the product must be improved. It could be tricky to find the right documentation on a topic since the documentation is spread in many places. I advise the new joiner to contact the community to get entry points and additional documentation. Tutorial and Video must be present to take up the product."
"The documentation needs to be better."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 13th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 3 reviews while OpenESB is ranked 10th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 3 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.6, while OpenESB is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Easy to develop and easy to run". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenESB writes "Supports top-down and bottom-up approaches for the services, processes definition, and composition". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with IBM MQ, Mule ESB, Apache Kafka, VMware RabbitMQ and ActiveMQ, whereas OpenESB is most compared with Mule ESB, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and Red Hat Fuse. See our Aurea CX Messenger vs. OpenESB report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
