Aurea CX Messenger vs OpenESB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
332 views|93 comparisons
OpenESB Logo
817 views|363 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and OpenESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus).
To learn more, read our detailed ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Radhey Rajput
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution offers excellent stability.""The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.""SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required.""ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all.""The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages.""The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros →

"OpenESB pushes the organization to clearly define service boundaries and interfaces. So it motives the business and the development teams to clearly define their business services and processes they want to implement. OpenESB supports fine and coarse-grain granularity for the services and supports top-down and bottom-up approaches for the services, processes definition, and composition.""The core is very stable.""The process-oriented solution allows you to define choreography and orchestration.""One of the most valuable features is being able to implement business processes while keeping track of the design from BPMN to a BPEL Implementation."

More OpenESB Pros →

Cons
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included.""The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.""The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services.""You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely.""It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc.""Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons →

"The documentation needs to be better.""Regarding its management, a web console being able to synchronize distributed instances would be great.""The documentation of the product must be improved. It could be tricky to find the right documentation on a topic since the documentation is spread in many places. I advise the new joiner to contact the community to get entry points and additional documentation. Tutorial and Video must be present to take up the product.""Cloud deployment is weak and needs to be improved."

More OpenESB Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."
  • "You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"
  • "The pricing is not so high."
  • More Aurea CX Messenger Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There are two versions. The first is the community version, which is free and contains the last part of the feature, but if you want to get the Enterprise version, you'll have to pay €60,000 which covers support and two instances on production."
  • "The Community Edition is a full product you can use in production, it does not have limitations like other alternatives."
  • "The cost for the prediction instrument is high because it is charged per instances based on prediction, but the rest of the solution is free."
  • More OpenESB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.
    Top Answer:The pricing is not so high. I will rate it a seven out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest. There are no additional fees to the standard license.
    Top Answer:The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services because the earlier version is not using web service and cloud functionality. If Aurea could include these features in the future… more »
    Top Answer:The process-oriented solution allows you to define choreography and orchestration.
    Top Answer:In comparison to other tools such as Oracle, the price is good for the service we receive. The cost for the prediction instrument is high because it is charged per instances based on prediction, but… more »
    Top Answer:Cloud deployment is weak and needs to be improved.
    Ranking
    Views
    332
    Comparisons
    93
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    456
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    817
    Comparisons
    363
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    395
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
    Learn More
    Aurea
    Video Not Available
    OpenESB
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

    OpenESB is a Java-based open-source enterprise service bus. It can be used as a platform for both enterprise application integration and service-oriented architecture. OpenESB allows you to integrate legacy systems, external and internal partners and new development in your Business Process.

    Sample Customers
    Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government6%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Educational Organization10%
    Wellness & Fitness Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    ESB (Enterprise Service Bus)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 12th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 7 reviews while OpenESB is ranked 13th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 4 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while OpenESB is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenESB writes "Enables us to define the business process and integrate it with other software". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and Apache Kafka, whereas OpenESB is most compared with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, Mule ESB, Oracle Service Bus and Red Hat Fuse.

    See our list of best ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) vendors.

    We monitor all ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.