No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AttackIQ vs PlexTrac comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AttackIQ
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
5th
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (48th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (18th)
PlexTrac
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
14th
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
23rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Penetration Testing Services (28th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of AttackIQ is 8.8%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PlexTrac is 1.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AttackIQ8.8%
PlexTrac1.1%
Other90.1%
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2783439 - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees
Continuous offensive testing has transformed our cloud security and prioritizes critical fixes
The continuous testing and continuous offensive testing are among the best features that AttackIQ offers, and being able to categorize it based on criticality such as very critical, emergency, high, medium, and low is valuable. AttackIQ allows us to resolve issues much quicker because these issues come in categories, enabling us to prioritize them and fix the emergency issues first. It has definitely reduced response time and improved our discoverability of these issues in the first place.
Use PlexTrac?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Construction Company
8%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AttackIQ?
AttackIQ can be improved by implementing more of a security training platform focused on real-world scenarios, simulating real-world attack behavior aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK and NIST frame...
What is your primary use case for AttackIQ?
My main use case for AttackIQ is conducting breach and attack simulation or any kind of new ransomware simulation, basically for executing particular real-world attack scenarios. Regarding my main ...
What advice do you have for others considering AttackIQ?
In my current organization, we are not using AttackIQ; in my previous organization, I have used AttackIQ, and it was more of hands-on training rather than being deployed as a typical tool for impro...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

DeepSurface
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Horizon3.ai, Cymulate, Pentera and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: March 2026.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.