For sure, that is the thing with Atlassian ALM: you just go to the marketplace and put the plugins and you are integrated, whatever. If I need to give it a grade on requirement management especially, I would put it at six or seven, probably six. Limited features and scalability are the reason I give Atlassian ALM a six or seven out of ten. They could have proper structure so that you can have document type structuring of the requirement and reuse of requirements and linking. You can do links in Jira, but you cannot manage them as in other tools. I would put Atlassian ALM at six because then you could get seven if you put all possible plugins and configure it for about one month. Out of the box, it is something around six. It is getting higher all the time with Atlassian ALM, but it is relatively much lower than the competitors still. They have AI features already built in and many other things. They have open pricing, and you can see the prices on the website. That is good; I would say that is how it should be with Atlassian ALM. It is not super fast, but it is constant. They have so much documentation out there that it is quite rare that you need to contact support because you know the answer already by searching online. This is totally missing from IBM because they have hidden their documentation mostly, and then online searches do not give you any answers.
