Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (4th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (4th), Data Governance (11th)
Boomi AtomSphere Master Dat...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Data Integration and Access solutions, they serve different purposes. Ataccama ONE Platform is designed for Data Quality and holds a mindshare of 8.3%, up 3.1% compared to last year.
Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions, holds 2.0% mindshare, down 2.9% since last year.
Data Quality
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions
 

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments
We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.
John Posthuma - PeerSpot reviewer
Strong integration and synchronization capabilities with saving time
Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub is a real integration tool that offers powerful and helpful features. It has data synchronization capabilities, and I have noted that it provides a benefit for all my integration needs. Additionally, there are notable benefits in terms of time savings, money savings, and resource savings for me.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."
"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."
"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."
"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."
"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."
"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."
"Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub is a real integration tool that offers powerful and helpful features."
"We use the administrator to create different interfaces. We developed APIs for specific applications like data validation between systems. We have our own product and base it on the Boomi interfaces that generate this type of data validation."
"The most valuable features of Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub are the ability to do data integrations, APM Management, MDM, and data catalog."
"The most valuable feature is that it's very easy to develop the processes and we have been using it for a long time. At that time, no other tool was available, and it was the best product. When we first got it, I don't think it was a Dell product back then. We upgraded to the cloud last year. Today, it's still the best because it's very user-friendly, and the user interface is also very user-friendly. We can easily develop the processes quickly."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it seems to be more of a drag and drop interface."
 

Cons

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."
"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."
"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."
"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."
"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."
"Data movement is a pain."
"We have problems in some scenarios where there are messages in the queue and would require some support."
"Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub could improve by having a ChatGPT AI tool to solve problems and develop quicker."
"There could be improvements in integrating more features with Microsoft Azure."
"The reporting needs to be improved to help get more KPIs in the longterm. Now, the system keeps only three months."
"The price could be better. It would also be better if they stopped changing the icons every six months. Whenever they change it, users have to adapt to them again."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is reasonably priced."
"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."
"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."
"We have a monthly subscription, which is $550 per month."
"The price could be better. In the current market, it's expensive but worth it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
863,429 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
27%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?
The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.
What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?
The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...
What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?
Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub?
The pricing of Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub seems reasonable compared to competitors like Informatica and other products. Most of these solutions are SaaS-based and cloud-native, making them co...
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub?
One challenge we face is the effort required in data preparation before using MDM ( /categories/master-data-management-mdm-software ) capabilities. A feature to facilitate data preparedness, such a...
What is your primary use case for Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub?
We are evaluating Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub ( /products/boomi-atomsphere-master-data-hub-reviews ) in terms of its features, especially from unified data models, data security, and complianc...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Dell Boomi MDM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library
LinkedIn
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Ataccama and others in Data Quality. Updated: June 2025.
863,429 professionals have used our research since 2012.