Astrix vs Recorded Future comparison

Read 18 Recorded Future reviews

9,746 Views
7,797 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Astrix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Recorded Future and Astrix compete in the cybersecurity space. Recorded Future appears superior due to its advanced threat intelligence features and overall perceived value.

Features: Recorded Future provides real-time threat intelligence, a comprehensive intelligence graph, and risk analysis tools. Astrix includes strong data encryption, access management, and lacks comprehensive threat intelligence.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Recorded Future offers efficient deployment and responsive customer service. Astrix's deployment process is user-friendly, but its customer service lacks responsiveness and depth of support.

Pricing and ROI: Recorded Future has a higher initial setup cost but offers better ROI with comprehensive security solutions. Astrix's lower initial cost appeals to smaller budgets, but its limited features may contribute to lower ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Astrix vs. Recorded Future Report (Updated: August 2026).

Astrix vs. Recorded Future

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Astrix

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (3rd)

Recorded Future

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Risk Protection (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of Astrix is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Recorded Future is 6.4%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Recorded Future	6.4%
Astrix	0.5%
Other	93.1%

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

Featured Reviews

Ahamed Shadhir

System Engineer at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Automated SaaS access governance has reduced OAuth risks and improves audit readiness

The best features are deep OAuth app visibility, real-time risk detection, automated remediation, risk scoring and prioritization, and SaaS-to-SaaS threat detection. The real-time risk detection and alerts have benefited us the most. Astrix continuously monitors connections and third-party apps, flagging high-risk applications automatically when risky permission, suspicious behavior, or unusual access patterns are detected. This helped us considerably. Since deploying Astrix, we've seen a 42% reduction in high-risk third-party OAuth apps, a 65% reduction in dormant SaaS integration, faster vendor offboarding from days to an hour, and improved audit readiness. The faster offboarding has been transformative. Before Astrix, offboarding was mostly manual and checklist-driven. When an employee or vendor left, we would disable their primary account, remove them from groups, manually review shared drives, and try to identify third-party apps they had authorized. After Astrix, it is centralized, automated, and immediate.

Read full review

Derek Lewis

Account Manager at Chevron

Continuous threat intelligence has improved brand monitoring and protects against leaked credentials

Some of the areas that need improvement in Recorded Future include email reports that can show unrelated content. Sometimes alerts pop up for articles that have been published years ago but were just recently discovered by Recorded Future. For the browser extension, since the main purpose is to present information regarding IPs, I think it would be best to provide us with an idea of where the IP originates or some additional information about the organization it belongs to. API capabilities in Recorded Future are improving, but there are still some features that are missing and some errors that are hard to handle and understand. The price of Recorded Future is a bit high, especially for smaller teams working on a tight budget, but it is very effective and relatively competitive for large organizations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since deploying Astrix, we've seen a 42% reduction in high-risk third-party OAuth apps, a 65% reduction in dormant SaaS integration, faster vendor offboarding from days to an hour, and improved audit readiness."

"We went from having zero visibility to complete third-party integration visibility, which helps us considerably."

"Astrix offers excellent observability features that track the user query, what the user sent, what prompt was sent to the LLM, what the LLM response sent, what retrieval documents were checked, and what tools were called, along with the final response."

"As a threat intelligence tool, it's very helpful."

"The tool is helpful in vulnerability assessment of zero-day vulnerabilities and phishing domains. The solution provides information on any domains of the organization that has undergone phishing or any other cyberattacks."

"From the feedback I've received from my clients, the most valuable feature is the ability to personalize the solution. The ability to have a customized dashboard makes it easy for leadership and management to obtain details. Intelligence analysts or security engineers care about the actions and results, whereas the leadership care about graphs and reports. Recorded Future helps my clients create reports and also determine how the intelligence that is generated is consumed. They can easily show the benefits to the leadership without them having to invest 10 hours a week into transferring numbers into a graph or into creating reports."

"The solution is diverse and provides me with a lot of different mechanisms for evaluation."

"After implementing Recorded Future, I can point out two positive impacts: first, the tool helps our SOC team save 30 to 40 percent of effort due to the reduction of manual threat detection and false positives, and second, the quality of our threat hunting has improved considerably, leading to a better understanding of the threat landscape."

"The features and capabilities of Recorded Future that I have found the most valuable are its AI-driven capabilities that make a significant impact."

"Recorded Future has positively impacted our organization as we are able to cover a lot of sources with only this intelligence provider, not having to have specific tools for clear web or social media monitoring."

"Recorded Future allows me to maintain very accurate alerts."

More Recorded Future pros

Cons

"Customer support could be improved so that faster support on services would attract more customers."

"Astrix is good regarding its accuracy and reliability of output, but the initial setup feels somewhat complex."

"Astrix could be improved with deeper coverage on on-premises and hybrid application environments."

"While I don't think the tool is weak, its position isn't as dominant as it once was. Other companies like CrowdStrike and Mandiant are now challenging them in many areas. One downside is that Recorded Future can be complex for customers to use and understand. This isn't easy for clients to navigate."

"The documentation and support resources provided by Recorded Future are bad."

"The product gives many false positives. If someone talks about the brand or organization name in the public domain over chats or blocks, it gets highlighted. It may not necessarily be a threat but still gets highlighted which increases the false positive count."

"The tool should improve its third-party supply chain risks because there is a lack of visibility."

"Recorded Future is a very expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."

"Lacks sufficient visibility of malware and international APT attacks."

"We can get the data of different malware active throughout the globe, but it would be good if we can do sandboxing of a file. For example, on Any Run, we can perform sandboxing of malware along with their intel about a particular file or hash. It would be great if they have a feature like that."

"When you add one website to Recorded Future, it should automatically call all other websites and social media platforms."

More Recorded Future cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I would rate the solution’s pricing a seven out of ten."

"The price of the solution is worth it. The overall performance of the solution outweighs the cost."

"There appear to be up to five different levels, with the most expensive version costing around $95,000 to $105,000 a year for subscription services."

"The biggest disadvantage of Recorded Future is the cost here in Eastern Europe. The solution is correctly priced for big companies who have the money to invest in such solutions. Also, the solution is useless on its own, which means that you have to invest in other solutions with which Recorded Future can be integrated. At present, Recorded Future can cost 60,000 euros per year. I am able to offer my clients a 5% to 10% discount, but in this region, the cost is still prohibitive even with the discount. If Recorded Future were more flexible in terms of price, there would be better sales opportunities in Europe and Eastern Europe, in particular, because we have more small- and medium-sized companies here."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Astrix?

My experience with Astrix's pricing, setup cost, and licensing was satisfactory. The team is very good. The setup was not overly simple, but it was not overly difficult either with the help of the ...

What needs improvement with Astrix?

Everything is functioning well, and new features are already available to improve observability and performance of the AI models.

What is your primary use case for Astrix?

Astrix is used primarily for observability of LLM applications, including AI agents and RAG systems. For example, we have a refund email process where a prompt processes the email and, with some in...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Recorded Future?

The price of Recorded Future is a bit high, especially for smaller teams working on a tight budget, but it is very effective and relatively competitive for large organizations.

What needs improvement with Recorded Future?

Recorded Future can be improved in terms of their APIs and their integration. Mainly their integration is very difficult, especially with their dark web monitoring notifications and brand protectio...

What is your primary use case for Recorded Future?

My main use case for Recorded Future is IOC enrichment, dark web monitoring, brand protection, and sandboxing for malware. For investment monitoring, privacy protection, or sandboxing in my day-to-...

Clutch Security vs Astrix

Comparisons

Oasis vs Astrix

Compared 37% of the time

Entro Security vs Astrix

Compared 19% of the time

Compared 10% of the time

Veza vs Astrix

Compared 9% of the time

SophosLabs Intelix vs Astrix

Compared 8% of the time

More Astrix Competitors

Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future

Compared 6% of the time

Anomali vs Recorded Future

Compared 5% of the time

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Recorded Future

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Recorded Future

Compared 4% of the time

Flashpoint Intelligence Platform vs Recorded Future

Compared 4% of the time

More Recorded Future Competitors

Product Reports

Astrix

Download Astrix product report

Download Recorded Future product report

Overview

Astrix is celebrated for streamlining workflows and optimizing data integration, enhancing efficiency with automation and insightful analytics. Its user-friendly interface and exceptional customization options cater to various industries. By boosting organizational efficiency and collaboration, Astrix enables data-driven decision-making and improved productivity.

Astrix Security

Recorded Future offers a comprehensive platform for threat intelligence and brand monitoring, supporting real-time alerts and data mining to protect against cyber threats and enhance security insights.

Recorded Future integrates advanced threat intelligence, allowing for seamless data comparison, comprehensive monitoring of cyber threats, and the detection of dark web activities. Users receive real-time alerts, access to an expansive database, and customizable dashboards for enhanced SIEM insights. The platform's capabilities extend to leveraging social media investigations and providing personalized user experiences. Key competitors such as Mandiant and CrowdStrike create a competitive landscape. Areas for improvement include reducing false positives, refining pricing strategies for smaller markets, and enhancing email threat intelligence.

What are the key features?

Threat Intelligence: Provides detailed insights into emerging threats and vulnerabilities.
Real-Time Alerts: Alerts users to security threats and unauthorized activities instantly.
Dark Web Monitoring: Detects activities on the dark web related to brand and cybersecurity risks.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers personalized dashboards for tailored threat monitoring.
API Integration: Supports seamless integration with existing security systems for continuous monitoring.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security Insights: Leverages real-time data for better threat detection and protection.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Provides continuous monitoring of cyber threats and vulnerabilities.
Increased Protection: Assists in preventing breaches and unauthorized activities.
Brand Monitoring: Protects brand reputation through detailed monitoring and alerts.
Time Efficiency: Streamlines threat detection processes, reducing time spent on manual investigations.

Recorded Future is a reliable tool for industries focusing on threat detection and risk management. It is employed for threat intelligence, brand monitoring, and cyber risk assessments. Clients use its cloud-based capabilities for activities such as threat hunting, forensic investigations, and continuous monitoring of cyber activities and data feeds. Industries benefit from its ability to alert on security threats and vulnerabilities, offering protection and maintaining brand reputation in an increasingly digital landscape.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Fujitsu, Regions, SITA, St. Jude Medical, Accenture, T-Mobile, TIAA, Intel Security, Armor, Alert Logic, NTT, Splunk

Astrix vs. Recorded Future