Astrix vs Recorded Future comparison

Read 18 Recorded Future reviews

10,151 Views
7,613 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Astrix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Recorded Future and Astrix compete in the cybersecurity space. Recorded Future appears superior due to its advanced threat intelligence features and overall perceived value.

Features: Recorded Future provides real-time threat intelligence, a comprehensive intelligence graph, and risk analysis tools. Astrix includes strong data encryption, access management, and lacks comprehensive threat intelligence.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Recorded Future offers efficient deployment and responsive customer service. Astrix's deployment process is user-friendly, but its customer service lacks responsiveness and depth of support.

Pricing and ROI: Recorded Future has a higher initial setup cost but offers better ROI with comprehensive security solutions. Astrix's lower initial cost appeals to smaller budgets, but its limited features may contribute to lower ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Astrix vs. Recorded Future Report (Updated: September 2026).

Astrix vs. Recorded Future

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Astrix

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (3rd)

Recorded Future

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Risk Protection (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of Astrix is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Recorded Future is 6.0%, down from 15.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Recorded Future	6.0%
Astrix	0.6%
Other	93.4%

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

Featured Reviews

Ahamed Shadhir

System Engineer at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Automated SaaS access governance has reduced OAuth risks and improves audit readiness

The best features are deep OAuth app visibility, real-time risk detection, automated remediation, risk scoring and prioritization, and SaaS-to-SaaS threat detection. The real-time risk detection and alerts have benefited us the most. Astrix continuously monitors connections and third-party apps, flagging high-risk applications automatically when risky permission, suspicious behavior, or unusual access patterns are detected. This helped us considerably. Since deploying Astrix, we've seen a 42% reduction in high-risk third-party OAuth apps, a 65% reduction in dormant SaaS integration, faster vendor offboarding from days to an hour, and improved audit readiness. The faster offboarding has been transformative. Before Astrix, offboarding was mostly manual and checklist-driven. When an employee or vendor left, we would disable their primary account, remove them from groups, manually review shared drives, and try to identify third-party apps they had authorized. After Astrix, it is centralized, automated, and immediate.

Read full review

Viral Shaa

IT Security Analyst at Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.

Intelligence-led security has transformed alert triage and now prioritizes energy sector threats

For the threat landscape, Recorded Future has a nice dashboard and reporting feature, though there is always an opportunity to improve how we visualize the high-severity sectors. It requires tuning to avoid alert fatigue, especially in high-threat environments like energy, where many threats seem relevant. Some advanced intelligence features require additional licensing, which can significantly increase costs. While Recorded Future provides strong IT-focused intelligence, OT and ICS-specific intelligence, which is improving, still requires supplemental sources for full coverage. New users or analysts newly onboarded to the team may need additional training to navigate the platform effectively. If we were to upgrade to a Tier 1 plan or an additional licensing plan, it should include advanced intelligence feeds that require licensing upgrades to unlock those features. Although Recorded Future is best in breed in the market, the company should consider lowering prices to be more accessible for mid-sized organizations where budgeting is a main concern.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since deploying Astrix, we've seen a 42% reduction in high-risk third-party OAuth apps, a 65% reduction in dormant SaaS integration, faster vendor offboarding from days to an hour, and improved audit readiness."

"Astrix offers excellent observability features that track the user query, what the user sent, what prompt was sent to the LLM, what the LLM response sent, what retrieval documents were checked, and what tools were called, along with the final response."

"We went from having zero visibility to complete third-party integration visibility, which helps us considerably."

"The most valuable feature of Recorded Future is how it detects everything regarding our domain."

"Recorded Future has positively impacted our organization as we are able to cover a lot of sources with only this intelligence provider, not having to have specific tools for clear web or social media monitoring."

"The intel that they were providing us over the emails was very good. If it found any hashtag in our organization's name on the dark web, a rogue IP, or a marketplace, it would send us an email and notify us that this is being mentioned, and if we want, they can take some action."

"The solution is diverse and provides me with a lot of different mechanisms for evaluation."

"Recorded Future has positively impacted my organization by allowing our analysts to work less on doing IOC enrichments."

"I have seen a return on investment as I explained earlier, it reduces the investigation time from days to minutes, and that is the biggest ROI; on a team of ten people that use it, one request can take you from three days to minutes."

"The most valuable features of Recorded Future are the useful alerts it provides. If we are monitoring a domain, the solution will provide us with an alert in a prompt manner. It is simple for clients to receive alerts. The advanced search is useful for more accurate filter results."

"It can collect data from various sources, including social media and the dark web."

More Recorded Future pros

Cons

"Customer support could be improved so that faster support on services would attract more customers."

"Astrix could be improved with deeper coverage on on-premises and hybrid application environments."

"Astrix is good regarding its accuracy and reliability of output, but the initial setup feels somewhat complex."

"Some advanced intelligence features require additional licensing, which can significantly increase costs."

"When you add one website to Recorded Future, it should automatically call all other websites and social media platforms."

"The tool can be pricey, especially for smaller companies."

"The customer support is frustrating and not efficient. They always request logs and screenshots that seem irrelevant."

"The price of Recorded Future is a bit high, especially for smaller teams working on a tight budget, but it is very effective and relatively competitive for large organizations."

"At present, my clients need to be trained by me or another organization on how to use Recorded Future and how to get the best out of it as an analyst, engineer, and administrator. It would be better if clients could directly learn these things without having to go through me or other organizations."

"We can get the data of different malware active throughout the globe, but it would be good if we can do sandboxing of a file. For example, on Any Run, we can perform sandboxing of malware along with their intel about a particular file or hash. It would be great if they have a feature like that."

"Lacks sufficient visibility of malware and international APT attacks."

More Recorded Future cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There appear to be up to five different levels, with the most expensive version costing around $95,000 to $105,000 a year for subscription services."

"The price of the solution is worth it. The overall performance of the solution outweighs the cost."

"The biggest disadvantage of Recorded Future is the cost here in Eastern Europe. The solution is correctly priced for big companies who have the money to invest in such solutions. Also, the solution is useless on its own, which means that you have to invest in other solutions with which Recorded Future can be integrated. At present, Recorded Future can cost 60,000 euros per year. I am able to offer my clients a 5% to 10% discount, but in this region, the cost is still prohibitive even with the discount. If Recorded Future were more flexible in terms of price, there would be better sales opportunities in Europe and Eastern Europe, in particular, because we have more small- and medium-sized companies here."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing a seven out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Astrix?

My experience with Astrix's pricing, setup cost, and licensing was satisfactory. The team is very good. The setup was not overly simple, but it was not overly difficult either with the help of the ...

What needs improvement with Astrix?

Everything is functioning well, and new features are already available to improve observability and performance of the AI models.

What is your primary use case for Astrix?

Astrix is used primarily for observability of LLM applications, including AI agents and RAG systems. For example, we have a refund email process where a prompt processes the email and, with some in...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Recorded Future?

The price of Recorded Future is a bit high, especially for smaller teams working on a tight budget, but it is very effective and relatively competitive for large organizations.

What needs improvement with Recorded Future?

Recorded Future can be improved in terms of their APIs and their integration. Mainly their integration is very difficult, especially with their dark web monitoring notifications and brand protectio...

What is your primary use case for Recorded Future?

My main use case for Recorded Future is IOC enrichment, dark web monitoring, brand protection, and sandboxing for malware. For investment monitoring, privacy protection, or sandboxing in my day-to-...

Clutch Security vs Astrix

Comparisons

Oasis vs Astrix

Compared 31% of the time

Entro Security vs Astrix

Compared 16% of the time

Compared 9% of the time

Veza vs Astrix

Compared 9% of the time

Aembit vs Astrix

Compared 8% of the time

More Astrix Competitors

Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future

Compared 5% of the time

Anomali vs Recorded Future

Compared 5% of the time

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Recorded Future

Compared 5% of the time

Flashpoint Intelligence Platform vs Recorded Future

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Recorded Future

Compared 4% of the time

More Recorded Future Competitors

Product Reports

Download Astrix product report

Astrix

October 2026

Download Recorded Future product report

September 2026

Overview

Astrix is celebrated for streamlining workflows and optimizing data integration, enhancing efficiency with automation and insightful analytics. Its user-friendly interface and exceptional customization options cater to various industries. By boosting organizational efficiency and collaboration, Astrix enables data-driven decision-making and improved productivity.

Astrix Security

Recorded Future offers a comprehensive platform for threat intelligence and brand monitoring, supporting real-time alerts and data mining to protect against cyber threats and enhance security insights.

Recorded Future integrates advanced threat intelligence, allowing for seamless data comparison, comprehensive monitoring of cyber threats, and the detection of dark web activities. Users receive real-time alerts, access to an expansive database, and customizable dashboards for enhanced SIEM insights. The platform's capabilities extend to leveraging social media investigations and providing personalized user experiences. Key competitors such as Mandiant and CrowdStrike create a competitive landscape. Areas for improvement include reducing false positives, refining pricing strategies for smaller markets, and enhancing email threat intelligence.

What are the key features?

Threat Intelligence: Provides detailed insights into emerging threats and vulnerabilities.
Real-Time Alerts: Alerts users to security threats and unauthorized activities instantly.
Dark Web Monitoring: Detects activities on the dark web related to brand and cybersecurity risks.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers personalized dashboards for tailored threat monitoring.
API Integration: Supports seamless integration with existing security systems for continuous monitoring.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security Insights: Leverages real-time data for better threat detection and protection.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Provides continuous monitoring of cyber threats and vulnerabilities.
Increased Protection: Assists in preventing breaches and unauthorized activities.
Brand Monitoring: Protects brand reputation through detailed monitoring and alerts.
Time Efficiency: Streamlines threat detection processes, reducing time spent on manual investigations.

Recorded Future is a reliable tool for industries focusing on threat detection and risk management. It is employed for threat intelligence, brand monitoring, and cyber risk assessments. Clients use its cloud-based capabilities for activities such as threat hunting, forensic investigations, and continuous monitoring of cyber activities and data feeds. Industries benefit from its ability to alert on security threats and vulnerabilities, offering protection and maintaining brand reputation in an increasingly digital landscape.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Fujitsu, Regions, SITA, St. Jude Medical, Accenture, T-Mobile, TIAA, Intel Security, Armor, Alert Logic, NTT, Splunk