IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • Aspect Unified IP vs. Siebel Contact Center

Aspect Unified IP vs Siebel Contact Center comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
7th
out of 32 in Contact Center Platforms
Views
184
Comparisons
150
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
9th
out of 32 in Contact Center Platforms
Views
135
Comparisons
111
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Unified IP
Learn More
Alvaria
Oracle
Overview
Aspect Unified IP 7.1. comes with a sea of enhanced features that fully leverage its highly available, scalable architecture.
Oracle's Siebel Contact Center transforms a business's call center into an integral part of its total sales, marketing, and service delivery strategy. The application enables agents to handle service, support, and sales interactions seamlessly across all communication channels. As a result, businesses can reduce costs while enhancing service delivery.
Offer
Learn more about Aspect Unified IP
Learn More
Learn more about Siebel Contact Center
Learn More
Sample Customers
Newport City Homes, HomeShop18, Red Roof, CCS Companies, AmBank Group, Golfbreaks.com
Southwest Airlines Co., Smiles S.A., Telekom Deutschland GmbH, Turk Telekom, Contact Management Center A.S., City of Atlanta, Ricoh Europe plc., City of Atlanta, BT

Aspect Unified IP is ranked 7th in Contact Center Platforms while Siebel Contact Center is ranked 9th in Contact Center Platforms. Aspect Unified IP is rated 0.0, while Siebel Contact Center is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Aspect Unified IP is most compared with Genesys Cloud, whereas Siebel Contact Center is most compared with Oracle Service Cloud.

See our list of best Contact Center Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Contact Center Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.