We performed a comparison between Aruba Orchestrator and Barracuda CloudGen Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product has reduced OpEx expenditure."
"The Business Intent Overlay is a great feature."
"The most valuable feature is optimization."
"The most important feature is WAN optimization."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"Aruba Orchestrator has notably reduced enrollment setup times from several hours to within an hour if prepared and planned."
"Live monitoring of what is happening inside and on the interfaces, either ingress or egress."
"They have a very responsive customer service and support team."
"It is a very stable solution."
"The product is foolproof. It has done everything that we have needed with the amount of email that we receive, and it handles it quite well."
"It provides a lot of functionality adhering to the current trends."
"Barracuda is very prompt at blocking any new spam which comes out."
"Their GPS possibilities and the security that it has, especially the SD-WAN functionality, is very good."
"We use Barracuda NG Firewall as a border firewall. We trough it to control all in/out Internet traffic."
"The solution lacks sufficient security features."
"They could provide essential training to understand the product functionality."
"The management menu should be simplified."
"The initial setup is complex, depending on the overall planning for the entire environment."
"Aruba Orchestrator should implement dynamic certificate changes for security."
"The solution can be improved by lowering the cost and making it more user-friendly for first-time users."
"A rule for email announcements, when configured hits occur, would be a great improvement for a more efficient experience."
"They have a very complicated interface. It's very hard to learn."
"Its interface could be better."
"Technical support used to be at a very high level but it is now a bit less so."
"To start working with spam, it takes a while because the product has to see that multiple emails are coming in with all the spam. If it could reduce that amount of time, then we would reduce the amount of users who are receiving spam."
"The price could be better."
"The analytics are weak."
"Barracuda CloudGen Firewall should work a little bit more with the logs so that, in our company, we can generate a little bit more reports and get a bit more statistics, which would be fine for us."
Aruba Orchestrator is ranked 13th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 6 reviews while Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is ranked 12th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 35 reviews. Aruba Orchestrator is rated 8.4, while Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Orchestrator writes "Reduces OpEx expenditure but needs improvement in security ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Barracuda CloudGen Firewall writes "Feature-rich, robust, and easy to set up". Aruba Orchestrator is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Juniper Session Smart Router and VMware SD-WAN, whereas Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, Sophos XG, OPNsense and Azure Firewall. See our Aruba Orchestrator vs. Barracuda CloudGen Firewall report.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
