HPE ProCurve and ExtremeSwitching are competing in the network infrastructure category. Data comparisons suggest that while HPE ProCurve is appreciated for pricing and support, ExtremeSwitching is preferred for its robust features despite its higher costs.
Features: HPE ProCurve offers scalability, reliability, and advanced security capabilities. Its menu-based interface is intuitive, complemented by a lifetime warranty that is unmatched in the industry. ExtremeSwitching is recognized for superior network management, flexibility, and innovative technology integration like its ring topology protocol which enhances reliability. Additionally, its NMS offers comprehensive management from a single platform.
Room for Improvement: HPE ProCurve could enhance its user interface consistency across platforms and improve integration with third-party software. Leveraging more cutting-edge technology could also align better with evolving network demands. ExtremeSwitching, despite its rich features, has room for improvement in pricing strategies to appeal to a broader customer base. Simplifying its licensing model and ensuring more seamless integration with legacy systems might enhance its competitiveness.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtremeSwitching provides a streamlined deployment with intuitive configuration processes backed by solid customer support. It emphasizes a user-friendly approach, enhancing customer satisfaction. HPE ProCurve offers straightforward installation and robust technical assistance. Its deployment is effective and supported by a reliable service team, providing users ease in setup and ongoing operations.
Pricing and ROI: HPE ProCurve is notable for cost-effectiveness and a favorable ROI, which resonates with budget-conscious buyers. In contrast, ExtremeSwitching demands a higher investment upfront, but it promises significant returns through its advanced functionalities. Although priced higher, it targets customers who prioritize extensive feature sets over initial cost savings.
The return on investment is high.
Requiring improvement in the technical support provided to customers.
The need to frequently contact support suggests we are not getting sufficient effectiveness from the service.
ExtremeSwitching is highly scalable, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
It is 60 to 70% stable, depending on usage intensity.
ExtremeSwitching's software stability could be improved, as it sometimes crashes.
When running bots, the system occasionally gets stuck, requiring reboots which result in memory loss and data loss.
ExtremeSwitching is priced in the mid-range, not too expensive nor too cheap.
For market-related sites, AWS pricing becomes significantly higher compared to DigitalOcean.
The most valuable feature of ExtremeSwitching is the Extreme Fabric, specifically the switching fabric.
It offers easy scalability and migration between different configurations.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
