Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ardoq vs Serverless comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ardoq
Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management
13th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Serverless
Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management
15th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Ardoq is 3.0%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Serverless is 0.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Architecture Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Ardoq3.0%
Serverless0.1%
Other96.9%
Enterprise Architecture Management
 

Featured Reviews

Anthony Houghton - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Architect at UK Research and Innovatio
Provides stable performance and scalability but not intuitive for data modeling
Overall, I would rate it around six out of ten. The training environment wasn't very intuitive, but maybe with more use, it will get better. We need to learn to navigate it. So, there is a potential learning curve in this tool. I use it once in a blue moon, and not very frequently because I have not found it very intuitive.
TC
Sr. IT Engineer at Best Western
Server management headaches have disappeared and deployment of APIs is now fully automated
My advice to others looking into using Serverless is that you don't need to worry about the server maintenance, the servers, and where you host the servers. All these headaches go away. Definitely it's good to use. All the headaches that we have been doing for all these years can be gotten rid of, definitely. This has been a great initiative taken by AWS. Previously, we thought that we cannot host our applications without any server, but AWS proves us wrong by creating a Serverless application, the option to deploy our applications without any server. This is a really great initiative done by AWS. I rate this solution an eight out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Government
9%
University
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?
Hi @Cheryl Joseph ​Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then Le...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Serverless?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that some of these are done by my solutions architect and I will not have enough information about that in my current role as a product mana...
What needs improvement with Serverless?
I struggled with wanting to put breakpoints throughout the code and then use the debugger. At the time, I was not able to step through the code with breakpoints, so if Serverless had that support, ...
What is your primary use case for Serverless?
Our main use case for Serverless is to build Serverless APIs, and the complete back-end is built with Serverless. A specific example of an API or back-end workflow built using Serverless is a parts...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Schibsted, Government of Malmo, Torvald
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Ardoq vs. Serverless and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.