ArcSight Logger vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Google are both solutions in the Log Management category. OpenText is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0, while Google is ranked #23 with an average rating of 10.0. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Google’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

ArcSight Logger

Read 32 ArcSight Logger reviews

3,476 Views
3,406 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Google Cloud's operations s...

Read 10 Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) reviews

5,489 Views
2,470 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ArcSight Logger

Google Cloud's operations s...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ArcSight Logger and Google Cloud's operations suite are both prominent tools in the log management and cloud monitoring category. Google Cloud's operations suite seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and better value for money in cloud-centric environments.

Features: ArcSight Logger offers real-time data search, correlation capabilities, and effective management of extensive log data. Google Cloud's operations suite provides seamless integration with other Google services, comprehensive monitoring features, and is appealing for organizations using Google Cloud. Its advanced cloud service integrations make it stand out in its category.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger users need better data visualization tools, streamlined usability, and a more intuitive setup process. Google Cloud's operations suite faces challenges with complex configurations, occasional performance lags, and room for simplification in its operational tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger has a challenging deployment process but responsive customer support. Google Cloud's operations suite integrates more smoothly into existing cloud systems but has mixed reviews about support responsiveness. ArcSight's strength is support, whereas Google Cloud's strength is seamless cloud integration.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger offers flexible pricing but concerns arise over initial setup costs, though ROI is positive in large-scale enterprise environments. Google Cloud's operations suite involves higher upfront costs; however, its robust cloud functionalities justify the investment and tend to offer better long-term ROI for deep cloud integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Logger vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Logger

Ranking in Log Management

31st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud's operations s...

Ranking in Log Management

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (31st), Cloud Monitoring Software (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ArcSight Logger is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)	1.1%
ArcSight Logger	0.9%
Other	98.0%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shoaib Abdulla

Sr. Cybersecurity Consultant IT/OT at EJADA

Compliance and cost-effectiveness have improved while critical infrastructure security adapts to evolving needs

ArcSight Logger fulfills compliance requirements and passes audit requirements. It is one of the Aramco standards requirements and is recommended by Aramco for any implementation. Aramco, SABIC, water companies, and electricity companies are critical infrastructure with air-gapped networks. In an air-gapped network, there is no communication going out from that network area to the outside world, even to the corporate network. ArcSight Logger is installed on minimal resources with minimal requirements. There are not many upgrades or new features that come up frequently, though they do occur occasionally.

Read full review

Anand_Patel

Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations

As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or Big Query can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings. It has default integration for all gcp services. recently managed Prometheus support gives more flexibility to organizations to remain connected with their current Prometheus setup. We leveraged integrated FinOps Hub for recommendations for our workloads and server configurations, helpd us lot in order to get maximum TCO.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand."

"In our country we are a little bit private in terms of solutions, so we are just starting to use the basic data capture. Now some users can start to use additional features that come with Micro Focus ArcSight like user behavior analytics for investigating."

"The functionalities of this particular server is absolutely phenomenal."

"The log digestion features from threat intelligence platforms like Recorded Future or Talos are valuable."

"The technical support team is good...It is a scalable solution."

"As the name suggests, it's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."

"ArcSight's robustness is its most valuable feature."

"I would definitely say to go with this product as it's the best in the market, but before opting for this product your perform solution-sizing because otherwise you might end up digging your own grave in fixing it."

More ArcSight Logger pros

"The cloud login enables us to get our logs from the different platforms that we currently use."

"I like the monitoring feature."

"Google's technical support is very good."

"Google Stackdriver is all about activity."

"The features that I have found most valuable are its graphs - if I need any statistics, in Kubernetes or Kong level or VPN level, I can quickly get the reports."

"It has really been helpful in detecting, identifying, and troubleshooting issues with cloud services used in the organization."

"Our company has a corporate account for Google Cloud and so our systems and clusters integrate really well."

"The solution has improved our organization by reducing latency and also monitoring the costs of GCP usage by using the logging and monitoring features."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) pros

Cons

"It's not a new product and is a bit complex. So, it requires a person dedicated to working on it and to know about it in and out. It is a huge product, and the search operation is a bit complicated for a new user or someone who has not used it for long. So for that person, it becomes a bit difficult."

"I think the ArcSight team should try to simplify legacy products for the customers, because that product is not easy to use or to work with. It needs more more competency or appeal to use. We hope Micro Focus is trying to resolve this."

"It is really difficult to work in ArcSight Logger, as it is very slow."

"The only thing I did not particularly like about the product was its speed on the web interface."

"You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose."

"The graphics and dashboard could be improved."

"I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory."

"Apart from that, it's a very complex tool and is not easy to implement and maintain."

More ArcSight Logger cons

"It could be even more automated."

"Operations documentation could be a bit better. It took us some time to get up and running with it."

"The process of logging analytics can be improved"

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver."

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it."

"It could be more stable."

"It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost."

"The product provides minimal metrics that are insufficient."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable compared to similar tools on the market. They offer perpetual licenses."

"It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now."

"I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive."

"ArcSight is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is quite harsh."

"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand. Still, ArcSight is more expensive than the competition."

"We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee."

"I would rate the product a seven out of ten since it's an enterprise product."

"We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."

"The cost could be lower."

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ArcSight Logger?

This decision is made by higher management as they don't want to have multiple solutions for one solution. ArcSight Logger themselves don't provide good support, but companies such as ours provide ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ArcSight Logger?

We do work for multiple SIEM solutions such as Splunk, QRadar, LogRhythm. My team and I mostly work on ArcSight Logger and Splunk because we are dealing with projects related to these solutions. We...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ArcSight Logger?

As a department head, my staff uses my credentials and contacts everywhere. Only ArcSight Logger with Splunk was implemented in Aramco, not in other organizations. I rate ArcSight Logger 8 out of 10.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Stackdriver?

As Ops Suite, is a google product which effectively comes at zero setup cost, in order to manage your on-premises logs on onsite, it involves negligible cost for using ops agent and it also include...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 12% of the time

Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 7% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 6% of the time

Graylog Enterprise vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 5% of the time

More ArcSight Logger Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 6% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

Mezmo vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger

October 2026

Download ArcSight Logger product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report

Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger

Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring

Overview

ArcSight Logger effectively manages vast log data volumes, streamlining complex query execution and data compression while supporting various devices to meet compliance needs.

ArcSight Logger, known for scalability, simplifies handling extensive log data and executes complex queries swiftly. Its data compression features, coupled with versatile device support, allow for smooth security analytics and log collection. Users appreciate its real-time network insights and intuitive interface. However, improvements are needed in indexing speed, user navigation simplification, enhanced system integration, advanced analytics, and comprehensive threat management. Companies leverage ArcSight Logger for on-premises log management, vital for IT asset event monitoring and compliance within telecom and enterprise sectors.

What are the key features?

Scalability: Handles large log data volumes efficiently.
Complex Query Execution: Quickly executes intricate queries.
Data Compression: Optimizes storage with excellent compression.
Device Support: Out-of-the-box compatibility with numerous devices.
Customization: Easily customizes to user needs.
Security Analytics: Provides robust analytics for security requirements.
Real-time Insights: Offers awareness of ongoing network activities.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Compliance Assurance: Meets audit requirements with comprehensive insights.
Time Efficiency: Fast query execution reduces analysis time.
Reduced Storage Costs: Data compression lowers storage expenses.
Enhanced Security: Improves security posture with real-time analytics.

In industries like telecom and enterprise, ArcSight Logger facilitates on-premises deployments to manage logs, process queries, and integrate with security tools, essential for incident response. It aids in retaining logs, monitoring Windows events, overseeing communications, and is employed in fraud prevention and security monitoring involving syslog servers.

OpenText

Google Cloud's operations suite is a comprehensive toolset offering multi-cloud support, insights into performance, uptime, health, and scalable logging for seamless cloud operations.

This suite by Google Cloud provides robust features for organizations managing workloads on GCP and AWS. It offers real-time logging and monitoring, aiding in efficient troubleshooting and performance analysis. With automatic monitoring, statistical insights for Kubernetes and VPNs, and the ability to manage logs, it helps in optimizing technology changes and supports risk management. Despite needs for better APM, cost clarity, migration tools, and enhanced documentation, companies benefit from its capabilities in tracking errors and analyzing metrics in execution environments.

What are the key features of Google Cloud's operations suite?

Multi-cloud Integration: Seamless support for GCP and AWS environments.
Performance Visibility: Insights into system health and uptime.
Scalable Logging: Efficient log management and export capabilities.
User-friendly Interface: Intuitive interaction for easy monitoring configuration.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Google Cloud's operations suite?

Enhanced Monitoring: Real-time updates facilitate swift response to performance issues.
Efficient Troubleshooting: Detailed log analysis helps resolve code issues quickly.
Performance Analysis: Dashboards support engineering load testing and SLA monitoring.

Industries utilizing Google Cloud's operations suite find it invaluable for optimizing cloud operations, especially in sectors involving extensive database requests and workload execution. Java and Python teams leverage its logging and alert capabilities for improved error tracking and metrics analysis, crucial for maintaining high-performance standards in tech-driven environments.

Google

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa

Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

September 2026

Free Report: ArcSight Logger vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Logger vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ArcSight Logger vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.