We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and FileAudit based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."
"We check a lot of logs in ArcSight Logger because we're running a massive database platform."
"The log digestion features from threat intelligence platforms like Recorded Future or Talos are valuable."
"It's a robust, mature product and you can do some really complex operations and analytics."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to pick up logs. It also has UEBA which has reduced the time to take charge of the events."
"The machine learning is a good feature."
"The most valuable feature is the search capability, which is simple to use."
"The ESM use cases are the most valuable. It enables us to use the big data collection inside our company. We are able to create use cases for whatever it suits and I find that the most interesting part of any SIEM solution."
"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."
"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."
"I think the ArcSight team should try to simplify legacy products for the customers, because that product is not easy to use or to work with. It needs more more competency or appeal to use. We hope Micro Focus is trying to resolve this."
"We find that the search and access functionality is quite slow."
"I would like to see better scheduling in the next release of this solution."
"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
"The product's connectors should work better and the user manuals need an update."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex."
"We have had problems with archiving."
"The next release should have AI capabilities."
"The updates management and central management console could be improved."
"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."
"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."
ArcSight Logger is ranked 28th in Log Management with 31 reviews while FileAudit is ranked 42nd in Log Management with 3 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while FileAudit is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FileAudit writes "A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas FileAudit is most compared with ManageEngine File Audit Plus. See our ArcSight Logger vs. FileAudit report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
