ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Enterprise Securit...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is 1.1%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Ramnesh Dubey

Solutions Architect at Ericsson

Allows for monitoring logs according to industry standards within ESM but has a total capacity capped at 12 TB, limiting real-time data retention periods

The first limitation is with the ArcSight Data Storage Manager (ADSM). ArcSight's total capacity is currently capped at 12 TB. This becomes an issue if a customer needs a longer real-time data retention period, such as exceeding 90 days or reaching a year or even ten months. Increasing the disk space beyond 12 TB is not currently possible. So, increasing the storage capacity is one area for improvement. Additionally, the real-time data retention is limited due to the 12 TB restriction. Depending on the Events Per Second (EPS) you receive, you might only be able to retain data for seven to ten days. Overall, the 12 TB limit is the main issue we face in terms of maximizing real-time data storage. Moreover, there are a few improvements I would like to see in future releases. My main suggestion for ArcSight is to simplify the deployment process. Currently, the installation process is quite complex. There are various components involved, including transformations, multiple installations, and containerization for various components. Ideally, I'd recommend that ArcSight allow the entire installation, including the ESM and database, to be completed within a single unified setup process for a streamlined experience. Additionally, having readily available and well-organized documentation for the step-by-step installation process would be incredibly helpful. I would also like to see better support.

Read full review

TamimKhan

Solution Architect at Tiger IT Bangladesh Limited

Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This process has helped to improve our organization because we have centralized the intra-group security equipment logs."

"We have been satisfied with the support."

"The out-of-the-box rules that help us configure functioning rules within the environment are valuable."

"The stability of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager is good."

"The tool sends an automated mail to all the operators, which makes it easy to share the information and reporting."

"Very good real-time reporting with a good dashboard."

"It makes maintenance very easy."

"We use ArcSight ESM for log analysis and security alerts. It warns us of threats and then helps us conduct a forensic investigation of a cyber attack or internal incident after it happens."

More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its artificial intelligence."

"It is effective because it has threat intelligence from across the world and constantly checks and updates for new threats."

"The most valuable features are behaviour analytics, threat intelligence, endpoint detection, and response features."

"I like that it's an AI-based platform. The most valuable feature is that it's a comprehensive solution. Most tools in the marketplace are comprised of miscellaneous items. They fail to provide real-time remediation features. However, with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, anything you can think of in cybersecurity, like auto-remediation, real-time response, and even on-premise components, is available in a single platform. So, it's perfect for finance and healthcare who don't want to share their data with a third party like the cloud. You can have this on-premise as well. So, the expenditure will be lower as less human intervention is required."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution is very cost-effective compared to Splunk and LogRhythm."

"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform notifies only genuine alerts. It offers plenty of options that are suitable for MSPs."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"The biggest requirement is that there is no cloud solution for this product yet. They need to create a cloud version. It's the biggest thing they can do to make the solution better."

"Could benefit from a more modern interface."

"The first limitation is with the ArcSight Data Storage Manager (ADSM). ArcSight's total capacity is currently capped at 12 TB. This becomes an issue if a customer needs a longer real-time data retention period, such as exceeding 90 days or reaching a year or even ten months. Increasing the disk space beyond 12 TB is not currently possible."

"The centralized dashboard for the hybrid cloud environment needs to be more focused. It needs to be redefined because it's missing most of the information. It should be a little bit easy to use. Currently, integration with various applications and connectors is not that easy. Deployment is easy, but integration is not that easy. ArcSight also has a very high bandwidth consumption to pull the local servers. It should have some kind of better process or ability to transfer files from on-premises to the cloud, from the cloud to on-premises, and from a cloud to another cloud."

"It would be nice if the interface were more user-friendly, with, for example, a minimal number of tabs to navigate."

"ArcSight ESM is not easy to use and it should be integrated with other tools that have infrastructure capabilities."

"ArcSight ESM's UI is a little cumbersome and complex, especially for first-time and occasional users using the console manager."

"Its search part can be improved. When I go to the console and search for a few logs or something else, it takes a lot of time. When I try to search for three days or one week, it takes too much time. This is a major area of improvement. I wanted them to include features like SOAR, threat intelligence, and automation, and they seem to have included all these features in version 7.3 or 7.4."

More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) cons

"The product should improve the triggering rate."

"For future releases, integrating incident response tools and improving communication on incident reporting could be beneficial."

"The dashboard has always been an issue."

"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable. Not many customers are willing to have a dedicated server with two CPUs and one TB of memory. The cost of this is huge for a smaller organization."

"The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release."

"It would be better if they offered global coverage."

"The SOP they provided wasn't great. They offered training over Sherp Virtualization, and the Seceon leadership visited our location to explain everything in detail, but the documentation and training could be better. It isn't as effective as it could be. There's some room for improvement there."

"We are at the client’s end, offering services. They don’t know about security rules and benchmarks. We are working on the discovery and remediation but we don’t really have the intelligence that was available while working with other tools. Human working is also very essential for the solution. The automatic session is impossible to play since it needs to touch Redfin for further analysis. No one has breached our clients."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ArcSight is pretty expensive compared with its competitors. I believe that is fine as it provides value."

"The licensing cost is affordable if you get an enterprise license. The licensing is based on EPS, so you can probably provide a package of license for multiple ESMs with their correlational end fees. It is cost-effective."

"The pricing is great compared to others."

"Customers without a ton of resources to dedicate to deployment may be better served by a managed ArcSight service."

"There is a license required for this solution."

"Aggregation can help a lot in pushing down licensing costs."

"We have a license to use this solution. The price of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager is expensive."

"The cost of the solution is not very high, although hiring a qualified analyst to work with the product is expensive."

More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) pricing and cost advice

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

"The price is quite reasonable."

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at Deloitte & Touche

Jun 28, 2015

Qradar vs. ArcSight

Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?

In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...

What do you like most about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

We utilize ArcSight ESM for real-time threat detection in our organization. We have custom rules that we've developed on top of the WAN services, along with scheduled licensing activities.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools. It is worth the investment if you are considering the cost.

What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.

Trellix ESM vs ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

Compared 15% of the time

Elastic Security vs ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

Compared 11% of the time

Google Chronicle Suite vs ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

Compared 7% of the time

More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Competitors

Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 13% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 11% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

Download ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) product report

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) report

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Overview

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is a powerful SIEM solution for analyzing, collecting, correlating, and reporting on security event information. ArcSight ESM analyzes information from all of your data sources while helping your organization maintain high security. In addition, the solution is very customizable and enables users to create their own company-specific rule sets to automatically trigger instant alerts.

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Features

Real-time threat detection
Visualization and reporting capabilities
Patented log management
Personalized dashboards
Scalable event monitoring
Seamless integration with your existing SOC tools
Behavior profiling
Data and user monitoring
Application monitoring
Analytics
Deployment/support simplicity

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Benefits

Some of the benefits of using ESM include:

Real-time information: ArcSight ESM can correlate data from any source in real-time to detect incidents before they become a breach.

Compliance: Optional compliance packs enable packaged reports for PCI, SOX, and IT Governance.

Security analytics: With ArcSight ESM, you can build and maintain a security operation center (SOC) through big data security analytics.

Integration: ArcSight ESM allows you to integrate SOC with network operations, service desk, CMDB, business intelligence, Hadoop, email security, application security, threat feeds, and more.

Speed: ArcSight ESM provides excellent speed of event collection with patented log management tools.

Advanced detection: ArcSight ESM can detect unusual or unauthorized activities as they occur, preventing business disruptions.

Decrease threat exposure: By implementing ArcSight ESM, you reduce threat exposure because the solution detects threats in real time.

Operational efficiency: ArcSight ESM makes it possible for you to automate responses with ArcSight’s native SOAR, which saves your organization time, and therefore increases your operational efficiency.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) users.

A Head of Professional Services at a computer software company says, “The simplicity of the solution is the most valuable aspect of the product. The product is quite mature. It's been around for a long time. The integration is easy for the most part.”

A Managing partner at a tech services company states that the solution is “Good at consolidating logs, fairly stable, and can scale.”

PeerSpot user Abbasi P., Vice President Derivatives Ops IT at a financial services firm, explains, “The user interfaces are quite good and speedy, and I like the consoles too. The typology and the setup are also good.”

A Chief Technological Officer at a tech services company says, "It is a very useful tool for intelligence building because it has many use cases and many rule sets."

An Associate Vice President at a consumer goods company comments, “We primarily use the solution for its technology including its independent logs, and those types of things. The solution offers very good monitoring. The product's log management and event management capabilities are excellent. There are a lot of really good analytical components. It helps us focus on analysis.”

OpenText

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response.

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis.

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates.

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Seceon

Sample Customers

Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.

Caduceus, SUNY

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform