Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Analytics vs Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Analytics
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
18th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Security Monitoring ...
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
32nd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (55th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of ArcSight Analytics is 2.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ArcSight Analytics2.2%
Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service1.2%
Other96.6%
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1311453 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Good filtering and reporting tools but can be difficult to use
It can scale as needed. It's not a problem. There are different teams using it. We have CSOC, which is internal, which is onshore, then we have a security operations center that is offshore, which would be in India. The onshore team might be a group of three, and the offshore might be a group of five. Likely, we have eight to ten people in total using the product directly.
it_user1640529 - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO, CTO at Genex Infosys Ltd.
Easy to install, highly secure standards, and reliable
We use Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service for security information, event management, and analytics. This has helped eliminate any external network attacks The security level that they are maintaining with the pre-authentication keys is very good. They are following the global…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion."
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection."
"The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."
"This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability."
"The correlation engine is good."
"The security level that they are maintaining with the pre-authentication keys is very good."
 

Cons

"The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use."
"The customer service could be improved, and additional integrations with other APIs could be added."
"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved."
"It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"Network integration is very crucial, and you need to have the knowledge to get it done."
"It's a difficult product to navigate, it's complex."
"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."
"The solution could improve by providing better documentation for beginners to learn, such as videos or other tutorials."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support."
"This solution is expensive."
"The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."
"In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."
"It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."
"My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics."
"The solution is not expensive for the data security measure you receive, it is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
20%
Government
11%
Outsourcing Company
5%
Performing Arts
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
What do you like most about ArcSight Analytics?
ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Analytics?
My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
SMA Cloud Service
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Exabeam, Varonis and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: December 2025.
879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.