Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Analytics vs Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Analytics
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
18th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Security Monitoring ...
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
32nd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (55th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of ArcSight Analytics is 2.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ArcSight Analytics2.0%
Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service1.2%
Other96.8%
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1311453 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Good filtering and reporting tools but can be difficult to use
It can scale as needed. It's not a problem. There are different teams using it. We have CSOC, which is internal, which is onshore, then we have a security operations center that is offshore, which would be in India. The onshore team might be a group of three, and the offshore might be a group of five. Likely, we have eight to ten people in total using the product directly.
it_user1640529 - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO, CTO at Genex Infosys Ltd.
Easy to install, highly secure standards, and reliable
We use Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service for security information, event management, and analytics. This has helped eliminate any external network attacks The security level that they are maintaining with the pre-authentication keys is very good. They are following the global…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to correlate different logs is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are that you get lots of connectors, which make it easy to log in to my ASM, and lots of prebuilt roles from the company."
"This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard."
"ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"The correlation engine is good."
"The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection."
"This solution allows us to identify connections for all users."
"The security level that they are maintaining with the pre-authentication keys is very good."
 

Cons

"Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked."
"I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation."
"I would like to see orchestration."
"The customer service could be improved, and additional integrations with other APIs could be added."
"I faced stability issues with Windows Operating System. The installed connectors hang if they remain idle for a long period of time."
"Currently, there are no compatible connectors for this solution, which means we have to depend on FlexConnectors."
"Their support team could be better."
"Network integration is very crucial, and you need to have the knowledge to get it done."
"The solution could improve by providing better documentation for beginners to learn, such as videos or other tutorials."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support."
"My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics."
"This solution is expensive."
"In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."
"It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."
"The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."
"The solution is not expensive for the data security measure you receive, it is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
882,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
19%
Government
9%
Outsourcing Company
5%
Performing Arts
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
What do you like most about ArcSight Analytics?
ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Analytics?
My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
SMA Cloud Service
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam, IBM, Varonis and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: January 2026.
882,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.