Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Archer Integrated Risk Management vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Archer Integrated Risk Mana...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (15th)
SentinelOne Singularity Com...
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
204
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (3rd), Anti-Malware Tools (2nd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (3rd), AI Observability (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Archer Integrated Risk Management is designed for IT Vendor Risk Management and holds a mindshare of 2.1%, up 0.9% compared to last year.
SentinelOne Singularity Complete, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), holds 5.1% mindshare, down 5.4% since last year.
IT Vendor Risk Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Archer Integrated Risk Management2.1%
OneTrust GRC8.3%
SecurityScorecard7.9%
Other81.7%
IT Vendor Risk Management
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SentinelOne Singularity Complete5.1%
CrowdStrike Falcon8.7%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint7.3%
Other78.9%
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2645985 - PeerSpot reviewer
Program Manager, Egrc at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Customer service excels while user interface could benefit from more modernizing
I use Archer Integrated Risk Management as an Integrated Risk Management (IRM) solution. I use it out of the box for what they provide Archer Integrated Risk Management is stable. Customer service is good. The company is very active in its roadmap, developing new solutions and adding…
Daniel Giacomelli - PeerSpot reviewer
Security and Compliance at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Strengthens cross-platform threat response while supporting audit compliance and log integration
The analytics and reporting can be a bit overwhelming. I love the dashboards, but I find that I need to better understand PowerQuery—specifically when to turn it on and off and its limitations. It's similar to SharePoint in that regard. As a former SharePoint instructor, I know it like the back of my hand. The best thing about SharePoint is that it can do whatever you want; the worst part is also that it can do whatever you want. You really need to know what you want before diving in. Most people usually have a good idea of what they need. SharePoint offers a lot out of the box, but you can customize it further if you wish. However, customization often requires hiring someone, which can be risky since you never know if it will work as intended. On the other hand, PowerQuery can help bridge some of those gaps within Singularity. The challenge arises when you want to incorporate what you've done into dashboards and charts, as there are limitations. For instance, I want more clickable drill-down options that allow me to filter on specific sections of the data, but that's currently not possible. It’s not to say that improvements won’t come in the future; it's just that it feels a bit early at this stage. Additionally, I find some navigation features frustrating, like the back button in certain contexts. For example, if you open PowerQuery from a chart, it doesn't open in a new window or tab. Clicking the back button takes you all the way back to the previous state, causing you to lose whatever progress you made. However, I'm actively providing this feedback to my partner, Pro Circular, through whom we access SentinelOne. They take our input seriously, and I've been sharing my observations. They have their own views but are addressing the issues I raise. It's good to see that suggestions occasionally lead to updates and improvements.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Archer Integrated Risk Management is stable."
"Archer Integrated Risk Management is stable."
"SentinelOne has helped us to improve our security by fine-tuning our current use cases and creating new ones."
"Our organizational risk has been reduced."
"The Deep Visibility feature is the most useful part of the EDR platform. It gives us good insights into what is actually happening on the endpoints, e.g., when we have malicious or suspicious activity. We came from a legacy type AV previously, so we didn't have that level of visibility or understanding. For simplifying threat-hunting, it is extremely useful, where traditional techniques in threat hunting are quite laborious. We can put in indicators of compromise and it will sweep the environment for them, then they would give us a breakdown of what assets have been seen and where they have been seen, which is more of a forensics overview."
"Singularity has the same features as other antivirus products, but it provides an added layer of security and vulnerability protection. It's also light on resources. Singularity doesn't use a lot of CPU or memory."
"The AI solution makes it easy for customers to detect and manage policies, as well as documents that help customers manage their platform."
"SentinelOne is the next-generation EDR solution."
"The most valuable aspects of SentinelOne Singularity Complete are the ease of deployment with the Sentinel Agent and the enhanced visibility with Skylight, which provides correlation of logs and all endpoint data in a centralized location."
"Deep Visibility is a valuable feature."
 

Cons

"The user interface, although it has improved over the years, could benefit from more modernizing."
"There are missing features in risk survey functionalities and the need for stronger dashboarding."
"We have had one or two occasions when we had to roll back off our Windows machine. Then, we had an issue with SentinelOne where we couldn't let the client make contact with the cloud service anymore. Therefore, the integration with the Windows Service Recovery could be improved in the future."
"If there is a vulnerability that we know about, I search for that vulnerability—for example, Adobe. There are different versions of Adobe, but I'm not able to compile them into one report. I have to create separate reports for those versions."
"The adware and pop-up blockers have room for improvement."
"We have had cases where Singularity Complete has caused applications to malfunction."
"It is difficult to manage users in SentinelOne."
"In terms of improvement, they should work on agents' updates because that is not a strong part. It's not their strong point. It's not straightforward to upgrade agents. I send them questions about it. They already worked on this and they promised that in the next release that they will show me their solution for it. But this year I have had complaints about agents' updates, that they aren't clear."
"The solution needs better reporting on new threats and malware. The reporting is present, but I can't find the information easily."
"A weakness seen with one large customer was that the detections were too intrusive, blocking many applications that should have been working, which led to many false positives."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"SentinelOne Singularity Complete is expensive compared to Microsoft but not Sophos."
"Its cost is similar to Trend Micro, but the protection is much better."
"The pricing is very fair for the solution they provide."
"Its pricing is competitive."
"The product's pricing is at par with what you see among major competitors. It's higher than McAfee, yet cheaper than CrowdStrike."
"The pricing of the solution seems reasonable, we got a discount but it still seems reasonable. The licensing cost is $3 to $4 per endpoint and can be paid monthly or yearly, with the price changing according to commitment."
"We are on a subscription model by choice. Therefore, we are paying a premium for the flexibility. We would have huge cost savings if we committed to a three-year buy-in. So, it's more expensive than the other solutions that we were looking at, but we have the flexibility of a subscription model. I think the pricing is fair. For example, if we had a three-year tie-in SentinelOne versus Cylance or one of the others, there is not that much difference in pricing. There might be a few euro or dollars here and there, but it's negligible."
"The pricing was very similar in terms of its competitors, but I believe SentinelOne's capability and willingness to attract new business allowed us to save some extra money."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business87
Midsize Enterprise44
Large Enterprise77
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Archer Integrated Risk Management?
The solution is more premium in my opinion. Licensing could always be improved, as with any vendor.
What needs improvement with Archer Integrated Risk Management?
The user interface, although it has improved over the years, could benefit from more modernizing. There are missing features in risk survey functionalities and the need for stronger dashboarding. T...
What is your primary use case for Archer Integrated Risk Management?
I use Archer Integrated Risk Management as an Integrated Risk Management (IRM) solution. I use it out of the box for what they provide.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. The ability to reverse damage caused by ransomware with minimal interruptions to...
Which is better - SentinelOne or Darktrace?
Which solution is better depends on which is more suitable specifically for your company. Darktrace, for example, is meant for smaller to medium-sized businesses. It is also a good option for organ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Sentinel Labs, SentinelOne Singularity
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Havas, Flex, Estee Lauder, McKesson, Norfolk Southern, JetBlue, Norwegian airlines, TGI Friday, AVX, Fim Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about SecurityScorecard, BitSight, OneTrust and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: January 2026.
881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.