We performed a comparison between Arbor DDoS and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"We have taken on the Arbor Cloud subscription, which is really useful because you secure yourself for anything beyond your current mitigation capacity. This is a really good feature of Arbor that is available."
"Arbor DDoS's best feature is that we can put the certificates in, and it will look at layer seven and the encrypted traffic and do the required signaling."
"Arbor DDoS is easy to use, provides effective blocking of DDoS attacks, and can be used for DNS, web, and main servers. Additionally, this solution is far easier to operate than others solutions, such as Fortinet DDoS."
"The artificial intelligence feature is most appreciated. This solution can lower the throughput and clear the traffic, which is something really important for us. It also provides good protection. It is user-friendly, and its integration has also been really fast. We have many critical applications, and it was easy to integrate Arbor DDoS with our website, mobile application, and web banking."
"The solution provides good protection against volumetric DDoS attacks."
"The stability is okay and we have not encountered problems with the solution."
"The technical support of Arbor DDoS is good."
"The most valuable features include the traffic categorization and control of the traffic. The filtering of the traffic is very precise. When you want to stop some traffic, you precisely stop that traffic."
"It has kept us up and operational on a day-to-day basis, without being interrupted by an attack from outside sources."
"The important features include automated protection and defense against many attacks, it's important that our networks are protected in the Radware cloud."
"The reporting is very good and provides us with a comprehensive description of where attacks are emanating from."
"The product integrates well with Cisco."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The product is very effective and performs well on devices."
"Technologically simple and effective."
"Its functionality is very good."
"The regional support here in African could improve, such as marketing and account managers."
"An issue which needs to be addressed concerns information I received of attacks on the radar and Arbor, allegedly, not taking any action."
"There is always room for improvement for any product or service. If we can bring in more agility when deploying services, that is definitely a scope which we can work towards. Nowadays, everything is being offered as a service model. It is not that we have to deploy the physical hardware, many things move up to the cloud, or even can be delivered in the VNS form in the customer's environment as well. So, in that space, if we can add more features to make it more seamless for customers to use and make it available through some marketplace, not only at the hyperscalers, but also for any on-prem deployment, that definitely would be a big plus."
"They should improve the reporting section and make it a little bit more detailed. I would like to have much better and more detailed reports."
"When it comes to some false positives, we need to tweak the system from time to time. There is room for improvement when it comes to the actual mitigation because of some false positives."
"On the application layer, they could have a better distributed traffic flow. They could improve that a bit. For network data it is very effective, but the application layer can be improved."
"The solution could be more granular to include logs per second and enhanced pipeline monitoring for router licenses."
"We need a SaaS model for the solution."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"APSolute Vision needs to be more granular so that it's possible to get real-time information."
"The dashboard could be updated."
"There needs to be more reporting."
"We would like to have seven-layer functionality."
"They need to increase the limit of devices that we can manage."
"This product would be improved if ongoing live monitoring with dashboards were added."
"This solution may not cover all of the requirements in situations for which I am unfamiliar, and there is always room for improvement."
Arbor DDoS is ranked 2nd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 14 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 4th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 11 reviews. Arbor DDoS is rated 8.6, while Radware DefensePro is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Arbor DDoS writes "The Cloud subscription makes the scalability limitless and you secure yourself for anything beyond your current mitigation capacity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Verbose and descriptive reporting, reliable, and it is easy to scale". Arbor DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Corero, A10 Thunder TPS and Azure DDoS Protection, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Fortinet FortiDDoS, Check Point DDoS Protector and Corero. See our Arbor DDoS vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
