We performed a comparison between Arbor DDoS and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can reduce the bandwidth to minimize the attack level. If we see more than 2.5 GBs we drop it directly."
"The stability is okay and we have not encountered problems with the solution."
"Arbor has the ability to learn and self-create the appropriate profile for each customer."
"The solution is flexible, easy to implement and has an efficient technical support team."
"Arbor DDoS offers security features that automatically detect and prevent DDoS attacks."
"It provides packet capture and we can block or whitelist whichever IPs we need to. Whatever traffic we want to block - and we get IPs from internal teams and from national teams - we block at the Arbor level only, because if it gets to the firewall then firewall bandwidth will be taken."
"The artificial intelligence feature is most appreciated. This solution can lower the throughput and clear the traffic, which is something really important for us. It also provides good protection. It is user-friendly, and its integration has also been really fast. We have many critical applications, and it was easy to integrate Arbor DDoS with our website, mobile application, and web banking."
"The stateless device format means that the box is very strong for preventing DDoS attacks."
"SSL-based mitigation from DDoS attacks is good from their side. They are capable of preventing SSL-based attacks with certifications and everything loaded onto them."
"They have a hybrid model approach if a client wants to go that way."
"This solution is extremely scalable and has the highest level throughput (100G) which complies with Telco deployment."
"The DDoS protection that the solution provides is its most valuable feature."
"The product is very effective and performs well on devices."
"As a service provider, we use the SecOps dashboard feature. That's where we check the time of attacks to see if an attack is happening at the moment or if it has already happened... It is very dynamic and helps us know when an attack occurred, how long it lasted, and what type of attack it was."
"The important features include automated protection and defense against many attacks, it's important that our networks are protected in the Radware cloud."
"The initial setup is easy."
"There is definitely room for improvement in third-party intelligence and integrations."
"The solution could be more granular to include logs per second and enhanced pipeline monitoring for router licenses."
"An improvement to Arbor DDoS would be to make evaluation licenses and virtual machines available."
"Sometimes it blocks legitimate traffic. If a legitimate user is trying to access the server continuously, the product suspects that this is a DoS traffic file. That is a case where it needs to improve. It needs machine-learning."
"The following areas need improvement: opening and tracking support tickets, online support resources, software upgrades/updates and replacement media, and event management guidelines."
"On the application layer, they could have a better distributed traffic flow. They could improve that a bit. For network data it is very effective, but the application layer can be improved."
"It is an expensive product, so there is room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"On the main page there are alerts that we are unable to clear, even though the issue has been resolved."
"The solution is a little more pricey than other options on the market."
"The dashboard could be updated."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"It could incorporate more intelligence for reacting with web site visitors."
"APSolute Vision needs to be more granular so that it's possible to get real-time information."
"I had some trouble in the registration account prior to deployment, but it was fixed. They were not very fast or responsive, however. It took about one week to resolve the issue."
"They need to increase the limit of devices that we can manage."
"This product would be improved if ongoing live monitoring with dashboards were added."
Arbor DDoS is ranked 2nd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 46 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 21 reviews. Arbor DDoS is rated 8.6, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Arbor DDoS writes "A critical solution for security, as it includes features that can automatically detect and prevent DDoS attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Arbor DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Corero, Fortinet FortiDDoS and A10 Thunder TPS, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Fortinet FortiDDoS, Check Point DDoS Protector and Corero. See our Arbor DDoS vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.