Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Application Manager vs BigFix comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Application Manager
Ranking in Patch Management
37th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
BigFix
Ranking in Patch Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (6th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (26th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Application Manager is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BigFix is 7.5%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Application Manager?
Share your opinion
Bella Yakoby - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers third-party patching feature, good scalability, and enhance endpoint management capabilities
From the perspective of the team that's handling the environment, it's not so user-friendly compared to other solutions, the competitors. We hire new teams from time to time, and they are complaining, look, although BigFix is very robust and cross-platform, it's not so fun to work with. The user interface for the technical teams is not so advanced. It's not so intuitive compared to SCCM, compared to ManageEngine. And this is the fact that they have, with the teams, because they have the rejection. The look and feel of the system are old-fashioned. For new employees, it's less easy to find someone I don't need to educate on how to work with BigFix. Although it's easy, it's not as intuitive as the other solutions, and the functionality of the other solutions is less advanced. Let's summarize: The user interface has to be changed from the perspective of the teams that are managing the product. It's old school.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about BigFix?
The most valuable features of the solution are Windows patching and the hardware and software inventory.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigFix?
The pricing is competitive, but not the most competitive.
What needs improvement with BigFix?
While performing integration, we face many issues with IBM solution. We need detailed information about those issues that can help users to mitigate them. The problem was related to the hardware co...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tivoli Endpoint Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Adobe 3. ADP 4. Airbus 5. Amazon 6. American Express 7. Aon 8. Apple 9. ATT 10. Autodesk 11. Bank of America 12. Baxter International 13. Bayer 14. Bechtel 15. Boeing 16. Bristol Myers Squibb 17. Cisco Systems 18. CocaCola 19. Comcast 20. ConocoPhillips 21. Constellation Brands 22. Dell 23. Disney 24. Eli Lilly 25. ExxonMobil 26. FedEx 27. Ford Motor Company 28. General Electric 29. General Motors 30. Google 31. Halliburton 32. Honeywell
US Foods, Penn State, St Vincent's Health US Foods, Sabadell Bank, SunTrust, Australia Sydney, Stemac, Capgemini, WNS Global Services, Jebsen & Jessen, CenterBeam, Strauss, Christian Hospital Centre, Brit Insurance, Career Education Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLSoftware , Qualys and others in Patch Management. Updated: August 2025.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.