Appium vs Temenos Quantum comparison

Appium and Temenos are both solutions in the Mobile Development Platforms category. Appium is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.3, while Temenos is ranked #8 with an average rating of 6.9. Appium holds a 3.9% mindshare in MDP, compared to Temenos’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Appium users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Temenos users who would recommend it.

Appium

Read 30 Appium reviews

2,459 Views
369 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Temenos Quantum

Read 15 Temenos Quantum reviews

944 Views
415 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Appium

Temenos Quantum

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Temenos Quantum and Appium compete in the mobile app development category. Temenos Quantum shines with its comprehensive features and customer support, leading to preference, while Appium excels in robust testing capabilities, appealing to those requiring in-depth testing.

Features: Temenos Quantum provides a diverse toolset for rapid app development, including integrated analytics, multi-channel support, and an all-in-one platform for mobile and web requirements. Appium, through its open-source nature, delivers extensive testing frameworks for multiple platforms, supports various scripting languages, and integrates well with other tools like GitHub Actions.

Room for Improvement: Temenos Quantum could benefit from easier implementation processes, enhanced maturity, and addressing integration challenges faced by some users. Appium might improve by offering better GUI functionality, simplifying running parallel tests on iOS, and expanding documentation to cover more advanced use cases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Temenos Quantum offers a streamlined deployment process with devoted customer support enhancing user experience. Appium's open-source status lacks formal customer service but benefits from a large community that aids in problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI: Temenos Quantum requires a higher upfront cost due to its comprehensive capabilities, translating into a higher ROI when used fully. Appium, being free and open-source, might need more investment in technical expertise for maximization. Enterprises desiring built-in support and quick ROI may favor Temenos Quantum, while those prioritizing cost-effectiveness might prefer Appium.

To learn more, read our detailed Appium vs. Temenos Quantum Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Appium vs. Temenos Quantum

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Appium

Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (6th)

Temenos Quantum

Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms

8th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Platforms (3rd), Rapid Application Development Software (20th), Low-Code Development Platforms (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Mobile Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Appium is 3.9%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 6.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Appium	3.9%
Temenos Quantum	6.1%
Other	90.0%

Mobile Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Luis Gerardo Meneses Hernandez

Software developer at Apps2Go TECH

Allows for direct interaction with an application's DOM but complex configuration

What I like about Appium right now is that it's like Cypress in the sense that I can get to the new DOM of the application and select the components and create the functions to test the components in the way I want them to be tested. That's why I like it right now.

Read full review

Zain Omer

Software Engineer (Kony-Temenos | Android) at Xpert Digital

Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability

There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of Appium is that it allows you to inspect the element. With the Appium Inspector, you don't have to install another application to do the inspection. I also like that Appium has Android device connectivity. Currently, most people use Appium as automation software, and I haven't found any other tool that's more powerful than Appium."

"Appium's best feature is that it supports multiple frameworks."

"The library is extensive so the driver interacts with most functions or actions on mobile devices."

"The automation part is extremely helpful in streamlining our processes."

"The interface is user-friendly, which is beneficial for users, even for those who are new to it."

"What I like about Appium right now is that it's like Cypress in the sense that............. to test the components in the way I want them to be tested."

"Obviously because of automation, it reduces manual testing efforts."

"The latest versions of the solution are stable."

More Appium pros

"It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space."

"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."

"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms."

"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."

"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."

"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."

"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."

"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."

More Temenos Quantum pros

Cons

"The initial setup is straightforward if you have previous experience with the solution, but it can be complicated for a novice user."

"The installation part of Appium is somewhat clumsy, requiring numerous dependencies and configurations."

"Configuration-wise, there is a lot of room for improvement."

"Appium can improve when the case fails, there should be a feature where you can generate the report from Appium. Once you're on a test case, automatically the screenshot should be captured which would avoid manual intervention. These features would be beneficial to migrate to Appium."

"One area where I think Appium could improve is in addressing security concerns for our data. Currently, we're unable to use cloud solutions like CloudForm due to security restrictions on our servers. We also face challenges in updating packages for the same reason. It would be beneficial if the solution could provide better support for auto-reporting and easier connections to mobile device farms."

"I rarely use Appium nowadays because I'm now at the managerial level, but the last time I used it, whenever I selected and clicked on an element, Appium was very slow. I tried to debug it, but I still couldn't find the problem, so this is an area for improvement in the solution. Another area for improvement lies with the connector and server. For example, the effort to get into the local machine sometimes causes the emulator to become slow, which then leads to failure in testing, and this is the usual issue I've encountered from Appium. An additional feature I'd like added to Appium in its next release is being able to do automation in iOS without using XPath and the name of the element. In Xcode, you can use previous UI tests for detecting elements, but in Appium, you have to use Xpath and the element name instead of being able to directly put the X-UiPath, which is what you can do in Xcode. In iOS as well, sometimes the element doesn't have a name or a path. Sometimes, there's also no element."

"What needs improvement in Appium is its documentation. It needs to give more context on the libraries that Appium is using under the hood. For example, my team is using Appium for Android automation, and a lot of times, I feel that there's functionality that's available through the Appium interface, that exists within the UIAutomator, but there aren't a lot of useful or helpful resources on the internet to find that information, so it would be good to have some linkage with the underlying platform itself. Another room for improvement in Appium is that it's buggy sometimes. For example, at times, there's a bug in the inspector application that doesn't allow me to save my desired capability set, so it would be nice to get that bug fixed, but overall, Appium is a good tool. The Touch Actions functionality in Appium also needs improvement. For example, if I want to initiate a scroll on the device that I'm running Appium on, sometimes Swipe works, but in other situations, I have to explicitly use action chains, so I'm not too sure what's the better approach. What I'd like to see in the next version of Appium is a more intelligent and more intuitive AppiumLibrary, in terms of identifying menus and scroll bars, etc., because right now, I'm unsure if I have to do a lot of export reversals to get to the elements I'm looking for. It would be nice to have some functionality built in, which would allow me to easily get those exports."

"Image recognition could be improved. We have some images in our mobile applications. It should be able to run from the cloud, so we can automate the catcher."

More Appium cons

"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."

"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."

"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."

"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."

"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."

"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."

"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"

"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"

More Temenos Quantum cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm unsure if there's any cost associated with Appium. I got the free package which includes the server GUI application and the inspector application, and it was free to download, and that's all I need to get my work done. I'm not aware of any additional costs associated with the tool."

"The solution is free."

"The price is good for people to be able to make a favorable decision for the value."

"This is an open source solution so it does not cost anything for licensing or otherwise."

"The pricing of Appium is fine."

"There is no license for this solution because it is open-source."

"It's completely 100% free, and there are no hidden fees."

"Appian is open-source, which is not licensed."

More Appium pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."

"It is expensive solution."

"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."

"The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it"

"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Appium?

I do recommend Appium. It is an open-source solution and completely free of charge. We use Appium and Appium Studio as our base for any type of mobile automation for testing. It has a great interfa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Appium?

Appium helps me to do as much as much as I want to.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Appium?

My experience with Appium from a pricing perspective is favorable due to it being open source, making it a cost-effective option.

See all answers

What do you like most about Temenos Quantum?

Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoot...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Temenos Quantum?

It is expensive solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Temenos Quantum?

The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require...

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs Appium

Compared 22% of the time

Qt Squish vs Appium

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Appium

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Appium

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Appium

Compared 9% of the time

More Appium Competitors

Appzillon Digital Platform vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 36% of the time

OutSystems vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 17% of the time

Mendix vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 15% of the time

Apple iOS SDK vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure App Service vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 10% of the time

More Temenos Quantum Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Appium

September 2025

Download Appium product report

Buyer's Guide

Temenos Quantum

August 2025

Download Temenos Quantum product report

Also Known As

No data available

KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum

Overview

Appium is an open-source mobile application development tool that is designed to give users complete control of their application development process. It enables them to optimize the development process when the need calls for it, and create the applications that they want in the most efficient manner they can.

Appium Benefits

Some of the benefits that come from using Appium include:

Ease of deployment. Appium is fairly simple for users to set up for the first time. Developers can download Appium and launch it with only a couple of clicks.

Easily track the results of application tests. Appium automatically creates reports when developers run application tests. These reports can give users insights into every aspect of the tests that they just ran. They can include detailed test results, screenshots of the test as it took place, and videos showing the test while it was in progress. Developers can also recall these reports with ease so that the information that was gathered is always at their disposal.

Gain deep insights into your application. Users can easily gain insight into the way that their application is running and how it might be improved. The reports that the system produces can provide developers with all of the data and insight that they need to improve their applications and make informed decisions.

Appium Features

When users choose to employ Appium’s mobile development solution, they gain access to many different capabilities. These features include:

Remote testing capability. Teams that are spread across the globe can collaborate and run tests from wherever they happen to be at the time. They can connect to Appium’s cloud testing feature and always have access to the latest iteration of the project they are working on.

Customizable test reporting capability. Appium enables users to customize the way that information from their tests is reported. They can create the kinds of reports that best reflect their objectives and needs. When specific information is needed, the reports can be formatted to show that particular aspect when the solution generates it.

Parallel testing capabilities. Developers who use Appium can run multiple application tests at the same time. This enables them to save time and resources while still accounting for every scenario that their applications might experience. Users can run all of the tests necessary to ensure that their applications are successful while spending the minimum amount of time doing so.

Reviews from Real Users

Appium is a solution that has a great deal to offer its users. It is a very complete mobile development solution that gives users the capabilities that they need to design their mobile applications with the greatest level of ease possible. Users can scale their application scripts to meet their needs. Additionally, developers can automate testing protocols, which reduces the amount of time and other resources that need to be devoted to the testing process. These two features make Appium a leader in the field of mobile application development.

Jayanta K., automation and nft manager at a computer software company, writes, “The interface for mobile automation is helpful for scripting and execution. It's scalable and there are many testers who would like to automate. In terms of scripting, scalability is very good.”

The head of solutions delivery (systems) at a wellness & fitness company writes, “Obviously, because of automation, it reduces manual testing efforts.”

Appium

Temenos Quantum is a Multiexperience Development Platform (MXDP) that combines ease-of-use and speed of low-code productivity with deep enterprise capabilities for both consumer grade digital experiences across multiple touchpoints and robust backend services for identity, integration, orchestration, business process automation, and business rules management.

Temenos

Sample Customers

Nuvizz, Coupa Software, Eventbrite, Evernote

Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank

Buyer's Guide

Appium vs. Temenos Quantum

September 2025

Free Report: Appium vs. Temenos Quantum

Find out what your peers are saying about Appium vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Appium vs. Temenos Quantum report.

See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.